---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9772/
---
(Updated March 16, 2013, 2:37 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Choda
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9989/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, mice xia, and Kelven Yang.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9956/#review18028
---
Ship it!
pushed to 4.1 and master
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 20
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9978/#review18027
---
Ship it!
pushed to 4.1 branch
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9978/#review18026
---
Commit 6d01ce565d4fe01c215eb6d6d894fa0dd6f3 in branch refs/heads/
Kelven,
Thanks for your response.. definitely will give it a shot on monday.
Much appreciated
Regards
Ilya
Original message
From: Kelven Yang
Date:
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts
You may be ab
What blocked you is not ssl keystore, it's ssh key. As it said:
NFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:) Going to update
systemvm iso with generated keypairs if needed
Password:
I just found recently we need to input the password many times, then
with latest build I only need to inp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9978/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
This patch
You may be able to do it by utilizing CloudStack management server
"instance" concept. However, do it at your own risk though. You may try
following
1) Planning your IP address allocation, make sure two set of IP addresses
spaces are separated
2) For each CloudStack installation, for example, 4.0
That sounds great.
Alex, Brian, and/or anyone - Do you know of documentation I can take a look
at?
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Yes. In 3.x, you'll have to specify the pluggable service in the
> components-locator.xml though.
>
> In 4.1, you can even specify y
Yes. In 3.x, you'll have to specify the pluggable service in the
components-locator.xml though.
In 4.1, you can even specify your own UI. You can get more details from Brian
wrt to that.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent:
I honestly think it could work, but your resource reporting in CS might be
off
>-Original Message-
>From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
>Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:27 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2
i doubt this would work. each cloudstack injects the system template with
its keys. the keys are there for the management server to program said
system vm are you following me?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Correct, there is no deep integration like agent, however
Correct, there is no deep integration like agent, however it creates system VMs
and storage pool and I'm not certain if it find them as conflicting..
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:17 PM
> To: cloudst
I guess it's a trick question, because there is no agent for vmware. I would
say you can connect the vcenter to both management servers, it all depends
if any data is stored in the vcenter database. I thought CloudStack sits
atop vmware rather than any kind of deep integration.
>-Original Mes
KeySummary Assignee
CLOUDSTACK-216Templates' Source Location Information present on
"template_host_ref" and "vm_template" tables should refer to Apache System
Template LocationsDavid Nalley
CLOUDSTACK-1557 EC2 REST API : cloudbridge database i
Yes I have 1 vcenter with 3 vsphere servers dedicated for cloudstack.
I want to use 2 CloudStack management servers (4.0 and 4.1) on the same cluster.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:42 PM
> To: cloud
I thought with CS we still needed vcenter, which would make the answer a no.
But by CS hosts do you mean management servers?
>-Original Message-
>From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
>Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:36 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [VMWA
Would you know if I can have 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts -
this is strictly for QA tests - not prod.
Thank you
-ilya
Thanks, Alex!
Do you know if that is a feature in 3.x, as well?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Yes. Implement PluaggableService interface.
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 1
As many of you know at this point, I am working to integrate the Palo Alto
firewall with CloudStack.
More info here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Palo+Alto+Firewall+Integration
The problem I am running into right now is that Palo Alto does not allow
any two interfaced to
Yes. Implement PluaggableService interface.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:52 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Extending the CloudStack API
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't really know
Hi,
I don't really know if such a feature exists or not, but I was under the
impression it was possible to extend the CloudStack API via a plug-in.
Is this remotely true? :)
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.73
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9924/#review17989
---
Commit 1dc1bf00c6a25b9af8bf9029bcb9e61265a8826f in branch
refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7436/#review17988
---
Commit edaa72d0fc39f1c03e38b3f7f61405cc54e269bd in branch
refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9956/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-997: Improve docu
"In essence, we need to sync up VMware better - something like, when an out of
band vMotion happens, we need to know it faster/asynchronously to enable CS to
get the up-to-date resource situation:" - this sort of mentions faster updates,
but it does not mention concurrent vmotion operations.
>
I noticed an issue on ACS4.0 where when you place a host into maintenance mode,
VMs are evacuated one at a time. The next job vmotion job kicks only after the
previous completed.
This can take an *hour* or more if you have a large number of VMs (in my case
40 VMs) on each hypervisor - to get i
Thanks Kishan. Will update the test cases accordingly.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:16 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Regions update
Sangeetha,
Test pl
Thanks for the clarification!
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: 15 March 2013 4:11 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM agent updates
>
> On 03/15/2013 05:06 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> > Is it fair to say that
On 03/15/2013 05:06 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
Is it fair to say that upgrades are managed by the administrator?
Yes, but it could be done by Puppet or Chef.
It sounds like the admin needs to take the host offline, pull the updated
packages and restart the service.
Depends on what the adm
Is it fair to say that upgrades are managed by the administrator?
It sounds like the admin needs to take the host offline, pull the updated
packages and restart the service.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 March 2013 3:56 PM
> To: clo
Generally you install the new cloudstack-agent and cloudstack-common
RPMs/DEBs and then restart the cloudstack-agent service.
On Mar 15, 2013 9:49 AM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
> How is the CloudStack agent daemon on KVM updated?
>
> DL
>
>
How is the CloudStack agent daemon on KVM updated?
DL
Sorry that was me and not Brian !:)
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rajesh Battala; Brian Federle; Animesh Chaturvedi; Haroon Abdelrahman
Subject: [Merg
Hi all,
The AWS health check feature
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 ) developed by Rajesh has
now been reviewed by the community and shipped as well . Moreover , the
complete UI support is now ready to be merged as well . So as a rule , I need
to inform the community a
Thanks Chip.
Jira ticket @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1697
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 7:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41]DB comparison (4
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Just a note that I'm wrapping this discussion up and taking "DRAFT" off
> the page as it's received no edits.
>
> I suppose the next step will be to limit access to PPMC/committers and
> coming up with a "rotation" to ensure that w
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:40:04PM +0530, Sailaja Mada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried database comparison between 4.1 new installation vs upgrade from 4.0
> to 4.1.
>
> There are 6 tables that are not available with upgraded setup when compare to
> 4.1 newly installation.
>
>
> 1) data_store_
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Sorry for the late response!
>
> Ack from my side, this seems good to have in 4.1 and will resolve
> some weird issues.
>
> Wido
>
All three commit applied to 4.1 now. Thanks.
Please resolve the related bugs!
> On 03/15/20
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/#review17976
---
also, what's the bug ID?
- Chip Childers
On March 15, 2013, 1:59 p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/#review17975
---
There was lots of back and forth about this topic. Is this patch sti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9860/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 1:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Child
> On March 15, 2013, 1:46 p.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
> > Ship It!
Haven't merged this yet.
- Sateesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9587/#review17973
-
FYI, everyone deploying master code for KVM needs to be using an
updated system VM. You can pull one down from Jenkins.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:58:55PM +0530, Edison Su wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
Sure, I'll make a point of it in the devcloud-kvm wiki, and hopefully
these messages will serve as a reminder. I hope those changes didn't
slow you down too much.
Anyone developing with KVM against master needs to upgrade their
system VM template!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Dave Cahill wr
Prasanna,
This is correct, an upgrade to 4.2 or whatever will require
upgrading the system VMs. I mentioned/inquired on this in another
thread, and it seemed like the we were going to require a system VM
upgrade. I wanted to make sure this change was ok. Chiradeep said
there was a procedure for
I have no idea why this worked, but I kept on typing my password (like four
or five times to make sure I typed it right) and it eventually worked. So
weird.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mar 15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9587/#review17973
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sateesh Chodapuneedi
On March 12, 2013, 7:15
Hi all,
We still have six unassigned issues for 4.1.0 that need picking up:
CLOUDSTACK-1409 - Add Troubleshooting documentation
CLOUDSTACK-1599 - Convert "Best Practices" section to XML and add to
Install Guide
CLOUDSTACK-1596 - Convert "Choosing a Hypervisor" feature matrix to XML
and add to I
> On March 14, 2013, 3:12 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
> > Ship It!
Thanks Vijay for the comments
- Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9165/#review17874
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9165/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 1:20 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Choda
On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
>
>> This thread explains the reason behind this issue -
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCA+2rt40+hwLPB6rv7d9ASJt-cJd3VHXBsWy=c9jo
On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> This thread explains the reason behind this issue -
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCA+2rt40+hwLPB6rv7d9ASJt-cJd3VHXBsWy=c9jonyizdf_...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> " It would happen if it's not pr
This thread explains the reason behind this issue -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCA+2rt40+hwLPB6rv7d9ASJt-cJd3VHXBsWy=c9jonyizdf_...@mail.gmail.com%3E
" It would happen if it's not product version, when mgmt server try to generate
ssl keysto
Hi folks,
When trying the latest 4.1 I am still stuck with:
INFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:) Executing chmod ugo+x
/Users/sebastiengoasguen/Documents/incubator-cloudstack/client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
INFO [
Happy weekend!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Hugo Trippaers, Wido den
Hollander,
Hi,
I tried database comparison between 4.1 new installation vs upgrade from 4.0
to 4.1.
There are 6 tables that are not available with upgraded setup when compare to
4.1 newly installation.
1) data_store_provider
2) image_data_store
3) nic_secondary_ips
4) object_data
> On March 15, 2013, 5:56 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Can you please also tell me a list of tests done for this ?
>
> Wei Zhou wrote:
> Nitin, I add a list of tests in "Testing Done" part. Please have a look.
>
> consoleproxy.url.domain is not used in any source codes. We use
> "c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9165/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 10:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Chod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9870/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 10:35 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Rajesh Batta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9908/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 10:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kaval
> On March 15, 2013, 5:56 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Can you please also tell me a list of tests done for this ?
Nitin, I add a list of tests in "Testing Done" part. Please have a look.
consoleproxy.url.domain is not used in any source codes. We use "company.com"
which is set in SSL certific
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 9:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta a
Sangeetha,
Test plan looks good to me. getUser is Admin only API.
Thanks,
Kishan
> -Original Message-
> From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 3:31 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [CLOUDSTACK-241 ]Region
Sorry for the late response!
Ack from my side, this seems good to have in 4.1 and will resolve some
weird issues.
Wido
On 03/15/2013 04:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Just wanted to ping on this again. I'm confident enough in it if widow
doesn't get a chance to respond.
On Mar 13, 2013 1:27 P
On 03/14/2013 06:33 PM, Edison Su wrote:
The uuid is a shortcut to find out local storage, when restart cloud-agent. I
agree, we should only take a look at local.storage.path, instead of uuid.
Seems like a good thing to do. Since that would make the configuration
on the agent even easier.
W
On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:34 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote:
>> On 3/14/13 1:27 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle
>>> wrote:
I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9587/#review17964
---
Ship it!
- Rajesh Battala
On March 12, 2013, 7:15 a.m., Anshul Gan
On Mar 15, 2013, at 3:13 AM, prasanna wrote:
> Python 3000 is a whole different beast. Likely many of our agent
> scripts won't work either. So +1 for adding the caveat in the docs.
> Considering python 3x support when distros depose 2.7 out of their
> repos seems like the way to go. Thoughts?
Python 3000 is a whole different beast. Likely many of our agent
scripts won't work either. So +1 for adding the caveat in the docs.
Considering python 3x support when distros depose 2.7 out of their
repos seems like the way to go. Thoughts?
On 15 March 2013 09:57, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> I think we
Since we are now patching via socket, will the older system vm
template still work? Or will upgraded deployments have to seed the new
template, destroy systemVMs and have the new ones come up?
On 15 March 2013 12:22, Dave Cahill wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> With the recent KVM patchdisk changes in ma
73 matches
Mail list logo
