---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10010/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 6:21 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil
> On March 19, 2013, 5:42 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
> > This is a new feature / enhancement. We need consensus on list to bring it
> > into 4.1.
Yes it's an enhancement, dropping the review respecting code freeze.
- Rohit
---
This is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10040/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Changes added for supportin
Thanks for the review Vijay. I will fix these loose-ends before merge.
Agree with site info being part of 'GlobalLoadBalancerResponse' object. I
will incorporate it.
On 20/03/13 9:18 AM, "Vijay Venkatachalam"
wrote:
>
>---
>This is an aut
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang.
Description
---
Changing de
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10038/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy and Kelven Yang.
Description
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10021/#review18138
---
Wanted to go through this feature but never got time during the FS,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/#review18137
---
Kawai-san, it looks OK since most NetworkElement::release do not do a
I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature
branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much conforms to what was
proposed in FS [3]. I added unit tests for all the new service layer methods
introduced[4]. I have made the patch available at [5], if any o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10021/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Murali Reddy.
Description
---
Merge requ
Thank you Sangeetha.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:15 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] Regions UI in 4.1
>
> UI for Regions feature is not available in 4.1.
> It
UI for Regions feature is not available in 4.1.
It is available in master branch only.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:12 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Regions UI in 4.1
H
Hi All,
I was curious if regions UI will be available in 4.1 or we pushing the UI
portion into 4.2?
I do see it in 4.2 but not in 4.1, hence I thought I'd ask.
Thanks
ilya
Just to be clear, the drop down for network offering when I create a new
network only has one option (DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatting).
Looked into API Call, when listNetworkOfferings call is constructed, for some
reason we are forcing the "supportedServices=SourceNat".
Is this
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:16:38PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> You are right . This bug exists in 4.1 due to the string sanitization
> check-ins which went in . Just need to cherry pick one commit from master to
> address this issue .
>
> Chip - if you could cherry pick up this commit
> -345
Pranav,
I went ahead and cherry picked this commit into my local branch.
Much better, but we do have 1 cell that miss aligned. Screenshot attached:
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/eyiq?size=o
Thanks
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10036/#review18133
---
Ship it!
applied to 4.1 and master. thanks
- Chip Childers
On M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10030/#review18131
---
Commit 6bc12fa66d983f295c3f3ab9d300e5e57a52cf4e in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10036/#review18132
---
Commit 6bc12fa66d983f295c3f3ab9d300e5e57a52cf4e in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10030/#review18130
---
Commit 7734650bf9217424fa1bb1d3cedb18ee31437df4 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10036/#review18129
---
Commit 7734650bf9217424fa1bb1d3cedb18ee31437df4 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/#review18126
---
Ship it!
Committed. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On Ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9923/#review18125
---
Ship it!
Committed. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On Mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9923/#review18124
---
Commit af0723e9c9259619c2cb5d77396e2297f1273a5e in branch refs/heads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/#review18123
---
Commit af0723e9c9259619c2cb5d77396e2297f1273a5e in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/#review18122
---
Commit 86a2a7504693e2672552fa98b90a60f9fea30196 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9923/#review18121
---
Commit 86a2a7504693e2672552fa98b90a60f9fea30196 in branch refs/heads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9923/#review18120
---
Commit 0ce1d4fde1fb9e68ed83a9e094133701abbee291 in branch refs/heads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/#review18119
---
Commit 0ce1d4fde1fb9e68ed83a9e094133701abbee291 in branch refs/heads
Jessica,
Please kindly review the backport of IPv6 and UI changes. I was only able to
identify this UI changing commit in the past 2 weeks that could be related to
this problem.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=623473394b142622d577dca33d5eb6500d88e52
Filled an issue @ JIRA, severity is BLOCKER.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1733
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41][UI] Add guest net
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10036/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
This patc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10033/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
This patc
As per the Feature's Functional Specification Document at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots , I
understand that the VMSnapshots are saved in the primary storage. I could
observe this in the VMWare Setup. But I am unable to observe the presence of
the VMsnapsho
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10030/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
This patc
On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So - as you all know, we're on the agenda for tomorrow for the board to
> vote on graduation. It's not a done deal, but we should be prepared for
> the word tomorrow that we've graduated and it's time to move on out of
> the Incu
Noticed 2 issues in latest ACS41 when I attempt to add a network using Advanced
Zones shared network - "without natting".
Issue 1:
Network Offering has DefaultIsolatedWithSourceNat - I don't see the network
offering I've created.
Issue 2:
IPv4 IP Range is no longer visible. Previous (2 weeks b
You are right . This bug exists in 4.1 due to the string sanitization check-ins
which went in . Just need to cherry pick one commit from master to address this
issue .
Chip - if you could cherry pick up this commit
-345114d0ca901de4754dd1d8e743ff3c9db5d764 from master , it would address this
Will do, I just thought I should confirm..
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41][UI] Possible bug - need to confirm - screenshot
> attac
Thank you Rohit.
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:02 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Musayev, Ilya
> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCU
Hi Radhika,
IPV6 section looks good. I had a couple of comments:
1.In 4.1.2.2. Limitations of IPv6 in CloudStack
"4. The administrator cannot specify the IPv6 address of a VM"
This is not a limitation. This needs to be removed.
2. In 4.1.5. Changed API Commands in 4.1-incubating
listN
Kelven, Kishan
Please review and respond to your patch comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:27 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reviewboard needs attention for patches for 4.1 re
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 01:23:20PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
> Here are the open items marked for 4.1 branch,
>
> Review ID Submitter People
> Bugs
> 10008 rohityadav chip.childers
> CLOU
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10022/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Summary (updated)
-
(CLOUDSTACK
Here are the open items marked for 4.1 branch,
Review ID Submitter People
Bugs
9908weizhou kishan edison
CLOUDSTACK-1666
10017 vijayvenkat devdeep murali.reddy chiradeep ramganesh
Is there a defect for this issue, if not please file one
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 12:51 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41][UI] Possible bug - need to confirm - screenshot att
Running latest ASC4.1, noticed a fairly minor issue where is not being
interpreted. Affects both latest Firefox and Chrome.
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/2gx5?size=o
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:02:01PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So - as you all know, we're on the agenda for tomorrow for the board to
> vote on graduation. It's not a done deal, but we should be prepared for
> the word tomorrow that we've graduated and it's time to move on out of
Hi all,
So - as you all know, we're on the agenda for tomorrow for the board to
vote on graduation. It's not a done deal, but we should be prepared for
the word tomorrow that we've graduated and it's time to move on out of
the Incubator.
To that end, I've pulled together a checklist of items th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10017/#review18097
---
+1 on moving code out of NetworkManagerImpl
- Chiradeep Vittal
On
I am fine with current document.
--Sheng
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> Sure. I am going to commit whatever I have done, so far.
>
> Sangeetha/ Sheng: any more review comments ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Hi all,
It appears that CLOUDSTACK-590 is specific to devcloud. Can someone
please take a look?
John - if this isn't resolved, do you agree that it's not critical for
the product release itself (i.e.: devcloud is a dev tool only)? If so,
we should consider downgrading it to Major.
-chip
Wido,
Can you take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1469 please? It got re-opened.
-chip
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:52:30AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Chip, David do we have a shared filter for release defects? That will avoid
> any confusion in interpretation of what is being targeted for a release. From
> Sudha's list below I don't think it picked up the "Affected version"
Chip, David do we have a shared filter for release defects? That will avoid any
confusion in interpretation of what is being targeted for a release. From
Sudha's list below I don't think it picked up the "Affected version" field as
baremetal defects are missing
Animesh
> -Original Message-
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10010/#review18094
---
This patch does not apply to 4.1:
# git am
~/Downloads/0001-CLOUDS
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:41 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bugs
> for 4.1.0!
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10008/#review18093
---
This is a new feature / enhancement. We need consensus on list to b
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bu
Great - thanks, Min!
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> For creating NFS datastore code in CS, you can take a look at
> HostMO
> class in cloud-vmware-base, which has method mountDatastore to create a
> NFS datastore. The specific vmware api call is at Host
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bugs
> for 4.1.0!
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Animesh Chatu
Looks like we have lazy consensus here.
With our graduation looming, I will wait a little while before requesting
the list.
On 14 March 2013 22:43, John Kinsella wrote:
> Yep great idea, concur on everything so far (not for events). If you need
> yet another mod, add me. :)
>
> John
>
> On Mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10017/
---
(Updated March 19, 2013, 5:18 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10017/
---
(Updated March 19, 2013, 5:13 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10009/#review18088
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1 branch. Please update the tickets appropri
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10007/#review18087
---
Ship it!
commit d20bcce7a2531320c764ddffd5af3a52d8d3cf98
Author: Pr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10007/#review18086
---
Commit d20bcce7a2531320c764ddffd5af3a52d8d3cf98 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10017/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Summary (updated)
-
Fix for CLO
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10003/#review18085
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1 branch.
- Chip Childers
On March 19, 201
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10003/#review18084
---
Commit fff8048a3a5cf3f74d247d4343789ac18c73ed9a in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10001/#review18083
---
This patch does not apply to the 4.1 branch:
# git am
~/Downloads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10001/
---
(Updated March 19, 2013, 5:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9989/#review18081
---
Ship it!
applied to master - thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9772/#review18080
---
Ship it!
Pushed to 4.1. Thanks for the patch!
- Chip Childers
On
I am done. Pushed it to master and 4.1.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:57 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:24:35PM -0400, S
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:34:56PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Since It's almost the first time we do this, I would suggest to post the docs
> in the translated language (PS: remember they are incomplete), and then we
> can file bugs for missing strings or wrong translations.
+1
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:24:35PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM,
I also encounter this mount issue on Mac OS, this seems an issue specific
to Mac. On my Ubuntu box, it went fine.
Thanks
-min
On 3/19/13 5:31 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>
>On Mar 18, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Sebastien Goasguen
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:24:35PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> >>> Radhika,
> >>>
> >>> The 22nd was t
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>> Radhika,
>>>
>>> The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
>>> think we're going to go
Hi Isaac,
Thanks for the info. I will try and update you.
Regards,
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Isaac Chiang wrote:
> Hi Kausal:
> I have a env exactIy the same with you. I'm using my laptop
> for running management server (outside the devcloud)
Hi Mike,
For creating NFS datastore code in CS, you can take a look at HostMO
class in cloud-vmware-base, which has method mountDatastore to create a
NFS datastore. The specific vmware api call is at HostDatastoreSystemMO.
Hope that this will be of some help.
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Radhika,
> >
> > The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
> > think we're going to go with what we have.
>
> Can we cut the translations on th
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Radhika,
>
> The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
> think we're going to go with what we have.
Can we cut the translations on the 20th? I still need to commit release
notes and a few other things related to
I think this is a great idea, Sebastien.
I've signed up for the Enterprise Storage section and am creating content
for it while I multi-task on other work items.
Just wanted to say that while I haven't updated the Wiki for it recently
that I am working on it as time permits.
Thanks!
On Tue, Ma
Yeah, any content on creating a CS plug-in would be great to have. I've
been reading the Wiki on it, but am still not convinced I know enough about
it to actually do it.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
> +1, and can we be clear on how the CS4.1 and above 'PluggableService
Hi Kausal:
I have a env exactIy the same with you. I'm using my laptop
for running management server (outside the devcloud) and it manages a
devcloud only for XenServer and nfs storages. The following steps work
for me and fyi.
1. mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm
2. mvn -pl develop
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:33:08PM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Chip - Thanks for looking into this. Please find my answers inline.
>
> On 18/03/13 10:34 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >Nitin,
> >
> >A couple of notes:
> >
> >1 - The license header is misplaced in ScaleVMCmd.java
>
> Corrected t
On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Chip,
>
> I am ready to update the /docs/pot directory and download the po files for
> the translations.
>
> Warning: Something to note about the po files (which contains the translated
> strings). There will be one file per correspond
Thanks for the info Chip, I just want to inform folks in case anyone
wants to follow up on this and on the thread you suggested.
Cheers.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Rohit,
>
> The ASF is participating. It's being coordinated via the
> dev@community.a.o list
> (http:/
Hey Ilya,
Glad to know that helps you, get the latest; pip install --upgrade cloudmonkey
and report and bugs, features!
Cheers.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Rohit
>
> Config files work as well and probably better than my approach if you are
> scripting and using clou
Rohit
Config files work as well and probably better than my approach if you are
scripting and using cloudmonkey.
Thank you
-ilya
Original message
From: Rohit Yadav
Date:
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org,"Musayev, Ilya"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudMonkey profiles to
We are having management server on our machine itself and not on DevCloud.
We are using DevCloud only for XenServer and NFS.
Should we run these commands even then?
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Isaac Chiang wrote:
> Hi Kausal:
>
> Did you use fol
Chip - Thanks for looking into this. Please find my answers inline.
On 18/03/13 10:34 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:10:25PM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
>> I would like to merge scale up vm functionality branch to master
>>
>> Spec :
>>
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9908/
---
(Updated March 19, 2013, 2:26 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala
Hi Kausal:
Did you use following commands for DevCloud deployment?
1. mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm
2. mvn -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb -P developer
3. mvn -pl client jetty:run
Regards
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Kausal Malladi wrote:
> Tiny Template is it
Sure. I am going to commit whatever I have done, so far.
Sangeetha/ Sheng: any more review comments ?
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:26 PM
To: Radhika Puthiyetath
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sangeetha
Radhika,
The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
think we're going to go with what we have.
IPv6 is going to be "experimental" in this release, so can we get
whatever portion is done committed?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> Hi Sebast
Tiny Template is itself not showing up and Management Server is not in
DevCloud. We are just using DevCloud for XenServer and NFS.
Is there any workaround to get things working using DevCloud?
Thanks.
Kausal Malladi
www.kausalmalladi.tk
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
