manage to finish it yet, but I'd
be very glad if we could join your efforts on that.
If possible, we would also be happy to contribute our OpenStack Python code
referenced in this thread.
My IRC nick on Freenode is alexpilotti in case you'd like to have a talk about
it.
Thanks,
Hi guys,
we have some trouble with NFS to access the secondary storage as we are
targetting Hyper-V server which, unlike Windows Server, doesn't have a native
NFS client.
How hard do you guys think it would be to add CIFS as an alternative to NFS in
CloudStack?
Thanks!
Alessandro Pi
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alessandro Pilotti [mailto:a...@pilotti.it]
>> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:53 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Development discussions for CloudStack
>> Subj
ut we have troubles
in deploying dummy instances as CloudStack cannot see and initialize a
secondary storage.
Do you have any suggestion on how to get around that?
Thanks!
Alessandro Pilotti
Cloudbase Solutions Srl
IT Consu
al Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:59 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hyper-V Support
>
> Idea is great.
> All these Hyper-V operations are implement to manage the Hyper-V
(e.g Live Migration) are handled by
the operating system itself, not by SCVMM (we already support them in our
framework). In VMWare case, those features (vMotion etc) are handled by vSphere
not by ESX/ESXi.
Let me know what do you guys think about it!
Alessandro Pilotti
MVP ASP.Net / IIS
O
cubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hyper-V Support
>
> Idea is great.
> All these Hyper-V operations are implement to manage the Hyper-V box
> directly using WMI calls right?
> Or these operations are implemented via SCVMM?
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
>
>
>
Support
>>
>> Idea is great.
>> All these Hyper-V operations are implement to manage the Hyper-V box
>> directly using WMI calls right?
>> Or these operations are implemented via SCVMM?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rajesh Battala
>>
>>
>&
t to manage the Hyper-V box directly
> using WMI calls right?
> Or these operations are implemented via SCVMM?
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alessandro Pilotti [mailto:a...@pilotti.it]
> Sent: Thursd
o release :-) ).
I prefer the third option, but I'm open to any idea!
Looking forward for your opinion!
BTW We plan to setup a CloudStack Hyper-V service in our datacenter on top of
one of the clusters as soon as we have a working beta.
Thanks,
Alessandro Pilott
10 matches
Mail list logo
