RE: [MERGE] Multiple IPs per NIC UI

Hi Brain, I have the following suggestions on the UI mock pages in the bug. 1. Place Acquire IP in the nic-view-all.jpg page nic 1(default) heading right side end. 2. In nic-port-forwarding-select-ip.jpg place IP drop down column after the VM name. Also please change the column name to VM IP

RE: [1/2] CLOUDSTACK-24: mipn feature for isolated and vpc networks

Hi David, The test cases for this feature are added in the AddIpToVmNicTest.java file. In review board after your comments uploaded a new patch (r2) with the test cases added. Please let me know If I miss any thing. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da..

RE: Copy template/ISO across zones is failing

Hi Deepthi, Can you check the routes the ssvm. On which interface the default route is set ? Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Deepti Dohare [mailto:deepti.doh...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:22 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Cop

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

host was added. > > Anthony, >It will be good if you can review the changes Jayapal is going to make to > security groups for additional ips. > > -abhi > > On 14/02/13 8:13 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" > > wrote: > > >Anthony, > > > >Wh

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

outputs, when a param can give > you control over output from an existing API. > > -abhi > > On 30/01/13 12:58 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" > wrote: > > > > > > >On 1/29/13 8:23 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" > > > >wrote: > > >

RE: [ACS41]Failed to login to Management Server

Hi Sailaja, Please check the below commit for the log in issue. For me this solved the log in issue. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2a0c2be1365b042fcabc2ab18c1ba4f374c5ce37 CLOUDSTACK-1175: PlainTextAuthenticator was being loaded due @Component ann

RE: Multiple IP addresses per nic

Hi Vijay, The guest network CIDR won't change. We can configure PF, static NAT rules for nic secondary ip addreses. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Vijay Venkatachalam > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:25 PM > To: Abhinandan Prateek; Jayapal Reddy Ura

RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest network - API issue

Found the issue, the parameter is command type is LONG. Fixing it to UUID. Filed bug for this CLOUDSTACK-1114 Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 7:46 AM > To: P

RE: new committer: Koushik Das

Congrats Koushik ! > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:39 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: new committer: Koushik Das > > CongratsŠnow commit the code you reviewed :) > > On 01/02/13 8:02

RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest network - API issue

; From: Pranav Saxena > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:10 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Abhinandan Prateek > Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi > Subject: RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall > manipulation for guest network - API issue > > I just h

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

primary ip addreses. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:15 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC >

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

See > http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/AESDG-chapter- > instanceda > ta.html#instancedata-data-categories > > On 1/18/13 3:40 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" > > wrote: > > >Jayapal, > > > > The FS seems to be updated with the

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

anuary 17, 2013 12:51 PM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC > > I hope we consider the case when the ip is removed from the nic while there > is a PF rule to that ip. > > On 1/16/13 9:10 PM, "Jayapal Reddy

[VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

Hi, I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for CLOUDSTACK-2999>:Egress firewall rules for guest network. Citrix would like to donate this code to Apache Cloudstack. Using egre

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

allow all > >VMs in another account/security group to access VMs in this security > >group. > > > >In this case, > > > >When secondary IP is associate/dissociate to NIC. The related security > >group rule based on account/security group need to be re

RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-299] Egress firewall rules for guest network

al > > You need to post the markmail discussion link as well as link to code for > review. Please post them ASAP > > > -----Original Message- > > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:55 PM > &

[IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-299] Egress firewall rules for guest network

Hi, I am starting the IP clearance process for the Citrix Egress firewall rules feature. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299 Citrix would like to donate the egress firewall rules feature to Apache cloudstack. About this feature, Currently all the guest network traffic in the i

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

t support in CloudStack (I'm willing to > > work on this, consider it important) - allow expiration of data, wider > > variety of data supported > > * Create the multi-IPs-per-NIC code to get IPs via CloudInit (Need to > > think through Windows equivalent) &

RE: Edit access to Jira

I to don't have the edit access. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 4:07 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Edit access to Jira > > Can someone with right level of

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

M, "John Kinsella" wrote: > > >I'd remove the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes > >can support way more. > > > >Why no support for basic networking? I can see a small hosting provider > >with a basic setup wanting to manage w

Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

Hi All, Current guest VM by default having one NIC and one IP address assigned. If your wants extra IP for the guest VM, there no provision from the CS. Using multiple IP address per NIC feature CS can associate IP address for the NIC, user can take that IP and assign it to the VM. Please fin

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

Updated the Egress firewall rules FS. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Egress+firewall+rules+for+guest+network Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:1

RE: Router command slowness

In my setup router /etc/hosts contain the following entry. 10.1.1.1 r-51-TEST >From the VM if I ping to r-51-TEST it is resolved to 10.1.1.1 Is your router has the above entry ? Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, O

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Hi Sangeetha, Once concern in doing that is effect on existing deployments. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Sangeetha Hariharan > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:56 PM > To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena > Prokharchy

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

ect: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network. > > > On 10/16/12 8:34 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" > > wrote: > > > > >Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring > >the firewall rules, but there is difference in the pur

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Hi Sangeetha, Please see my comments inline. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Sangeetha Hariharan > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:35 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi > Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall i

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

In SRX , Do we expect the firewall rule for port 80 and Static NAT rule to be > deleted ? Yes > > After Step 7 , > > In SRX , Do we expect the firewall rule for port 22 and Static NAT rule to be > created ? Yes > > -Thanks > Sangeetha > > -Original Mes

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

for configuring firewall rules per public IP. Thanks, Jayapal Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Anthony Xu > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 6:38 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi > Subject: RE: Egress firewa

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Updated the FS as per the discussion. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Static+NAT,+Port+Forwarding+and+Firewall+Implementation+on+SRX Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Please see my comments inline. -Jayapal From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:04 PM To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi mailto:jayapalreddy.ur

RE: "Egress Firewall Rules" feature FS

Hi Nilesh, Please fine my inline comments. Thanks, Jayapal From: Nilesh Vishwakarma Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:37 PM To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: "Egress Firewall Rules" feature FS Hey, My review comments on "Egress Firewall

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Hi Alena, Please see my comments inline, -Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Alena Prokharchyk > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:19 PM > To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenati

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Alena, Please find my inline comments. Thanks, Jayapal Thanks, Jayapal -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:54 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on

RE: New PPMC member: Edison Su

Congrats Edison! -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:19 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: New PPMC member: Edison Su Congrats Edison! From: Ahmad Emneina [ah

StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

StaticNAT, PortForwarding and Firewall current functionality in SRX is not similar to the Virtual router. This functional spec describes the what configuration possible on the SRX and also the limitation of SRX compared to the functionality in VR. Please find the functional spec here:

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:43 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network. On 10/9/12 8:10 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > wrote: >> Th

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

, Jayapal -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:41 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network. On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi David, >

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

ubject: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network. On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > The egress firewall rules feature will configure the egress rules for > guest network on VR/External firewall to ALLOW > > specified traffic to outside and BLOCK

Egress firewall rules for guest network.

The egress firewall rules feature will configure the egress rules for guest network on VR/External firewall to ALLOW specified traffic to outside and BLOCK the remaining traffic. By default all the traffic is ALLOWED to public network. When you specify a egress rule only that rule specific

RE: Problem with VM private IP

all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 root@r-17-VRDLAB:~# On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > Debug the traffic flow ... whether the traffic sent to VR guest > network interface then public interface . > Plea

RE: Problem with VM private IP

wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >The telnet packets are not reaching the telnet server VM. > > > >I'm using CS 3.0.2. > > > >Thanks for replying ! > > > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > >jayapalreddy.ur...@citri

RE: Problem with VM private IP

Using firewall and port forwarding rules only we can access the VM services from the public network also from the VMs using the Public IPs. For you telnet from outside network success but from failed from VM to VM using public IP. Seems hair pin NAT got failed ... Please capture the packets o

RE: [ISSUE] Failed to create vm instance from template or ISO due to null Exception

Hi Gavin, There is a mistake while committing VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java to ASF, changes applied incorrectly. The new changes are committed to ASF. You can't change to findByNetworkIdAndType because it will cause wrong dns ip to VM in multiple pods case. Thanks for finding the is

kvm agent debugging

Hi, How to connect the debugger in eclipse to kvm agent for debugging. 1. I started the management server in debug mode, using eclipse IDE. 2. Agent is installed in kvm host. In case of xenserver host I can connect the debugger to 8787 port and debug, In case of kvm what are the s