In general, it's best to remove them... that's the SOP for
the vast majority of other ASF projects.
On Feb 12, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:14:52PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> I notice that some files have @author javadoc tags in them. Is this kosher?
+1 !
On Jan 28, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> G'Day!
>
> Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm re-starting
> the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release.
>
> Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on
> the wiki here:
>
> https://cwi
Before I download, have there been any changes to DevCloud?
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Howdy all!
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) release
> 4.0.1-incubating.
>
> Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on
w00t!
On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Joe to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Joe!
>
> Regards,
>
> Noah
> o
Yeah, with PMC members it's a kinda-different ball o' wax.
For committers, not so much.
On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 2.3. Committers
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>> 2.3. Committers
>>>
>>> The project's Committers are responsible for the project's technical
>>> management. Committers have access to all project source control
>>> repositories. Committers may cast binding votes on any technical
>>> discussion regarding the project (or any sub-project).
>
Looks good here.
+1 [binding]
On Oct 23, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Sailaja Mada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rhel 6.3 oss build [CloudStack-oss-4.0.0-869.tar] is used for validation with
> Xenserver 6.0.2 .
>
> Validated Scenario: VM life cycle operations on Advanced and Basic Zone .
>
> My vote is +1 .
>
> T
You can replace Noel's name w/ mine...
On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:08 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was discussing crypto filings this evening with Brett Porter,
> particularly the fact that I, as a peon at the ASF, had proposed on
> the list making regulatory filings on behalf of the ASF
Sorry if this has been noted and discussed before, but this
is interesting, esp as related to the future of CloudStack
http://www.mirantis.com/blog/an-openstack-guy-takes-cloudstack-for-a-test-drive/
Previous history has shown that such "umbrella" projects (those
with several sub-projects) are usually much more difficult to
keep successful than a large project *or* a group of same-level
top level projects.
So here's my -1
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> After doing the merg
++1. Plus, it should not become the default method for doing development.
If the dev list becomes simply a log of irc discussions, then this
needs to be shut down at once.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:04 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Great idea, just a couple of notes:
> 1- Any discussions
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> #Stance
> My personal stance is that the name should be 'Apache CloudStack' .
>
Mine as well... I see no reason to change and many reasons
for it to remain CloudStack.
Other podlings were required to rename, simply because they didn't
have the
I may have missed this, but who is working on this?
On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
> PMC.
> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
> board r
13 matches
Mail list logo
