Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

YAY. On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared > networks of advanced zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] a

Re: New committer: Kelcey Damage

Congrats Kelcey On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) < kel...@backbonetechnology.com> wrote: > Awesome, that made my day :) > > -kd > > >-Original Message- > >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:10 PM > >To: cloudsta

Re: [OFFLINE] Oct 29 - December 12th

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hello, > > I already mentioned it in the IRC meeting from last week, but I'll be going > offline until December 12nd. > > I'm pretty packed at my daily job and next week it's ApacheCon. > > On November 12 I'm flying out for a vacation t

Re: [OFFLINE] October 27- November 3rd

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am going to try and unplug and enjoy a brief respite from work for a > few days. > > Immediately after this I'll be in Europe attending ApacheConEU, so it > may take me several days to fully catch up. > > See you in a few days

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Will Chan wrote: > We definitely need to add these same issues in ASF Jira if it's still there. > > Will > >> -Original Message- >> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:48 AM >> To: cloudstack-us...@incub

Re: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Thank you David! You said what I am thinking. > > Wido > > Op 13 okt. 2012 om 19:11 heeft David Nalley het volgende > geschreven: > >> Hi folks: >> >> So a couple of comments. >> I appreciate the level of passion seen in this thread -

Re: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Clement Chen wrote: > A little bit background: > > Gartner published a research report - "Don't Let OpenStack Hype Distort Your > Selection of a Cloud Management Platform in 2012 > " on > O

Re: Moving JIRA emails to a separate list

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > +1 > ++1 their clouding whats relevant for users, and relevant for developers > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > Op 6 okt. 2012 om 02:46 heeft "Noah Slater" het > volgende geschreven: > >> Community, >> >> I propose we move JIRA emails to

Re: [Events] Free Passes to LInuxCon/CloudOpen

i could use two... ill be in san diego for the dates On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt wrote: > Mark > > Cloudsoft also has a few free passes (first come first served) to CloudOpen. > > Best > > Duncan > > On 15 August 2012 21:26, Hinkle Mark R. wrote: > >> I think I'll have

Re: [PROPOSAL] CloudStack Marketplace

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Jie Feng wrote: > In continuation to the discussion [1] and taken feedback from community > members, I am proposing a new component under Apache CloudStack, called > CloudStack Marketplace [2]. > Per John and Chiradeep's suggestion, the Marketplace client piece i

Re: CS, VLANs and XCP ....... Oh my....

simple configuration done correctly. Almost to the point where i question the use of cloudstack at all. it should in essence just be easy to accomplish what we wished, without CS in the mix XCP was perfectly capable of doing what we needed without all these VLAN hurdles cs imposes > > On 8/13/12

CS, VLANs and XCP ....... Oh my....

ok we caved in and finally hijacked a vlan capable switch and reconfigured our whole environment to comply with CS and its requirements for vlans We literally reconfigured our whole environment to accommodate the forced use of VLANs by cloudstack for advanced networking. Everything prior ran perfec

Re: Networking question

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Patton wrote: > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > >> we dont have VLAN capable switches > > > I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even > the cheapest PoS I'

Re: Networking question

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Patton wrote: > On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:09:30 -0400, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > >> I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case >> for having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have no >> outside connectivity s

Re: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.

ate my > network through the API I realized that I could do pretty much whatever I > wanted with advanced networking. > > Outback Dingo, you should be able to do what you want by explicitly setting > the traffic labels to the bridge devices you want. Cloudstack *should* then > foreg

Re: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.

preciate the input, though these feature might be nice, we dont see the need for GRE tunnels and the overhead, its a pretty simple network layout and well... Nicira NVP... commercial.. and probably another box in the mix > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Outback Dingo [

Re: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Patton wrote: > When you host more than a few customers who rightfully expect their traffic > to be private you quickly run out of physical network cards. We dont and im sure others dont have customers, requiring private traffic as a requirement, as client

Re: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.

ultiple guest networks per vm > >> -Original Message- >> From: Outback Dingo [mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:29 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED. >> >&g

VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.

Just a curiosity, wonder if there way any way to allow advanced networking without using VLANS I get the security concept, though i question their use in certain configurations and that not everyone can afford the high end switches required to maintain a VLAN network. Simply put, we should be given

Re: [DISCUSS] Source code from realhostip.com service

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Just a quick follow up - I've posted the code so it can be viewed on > my personal github account. Making such a proposal without being able > to see the code isn't terribly helpful, I apologize that it took me so > long to do so. > > https:/

Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:32 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> 2 - Does anyone have an alternate suggestion for how to achieve what I >> had hoped to achieve? > > Hi Chip, I did not know about Vagrant, it sounds great, but if it does not > work you might

Re: Runbook for a very small setup

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 06/29/2012 05:30 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been working on a set of prescriptive instructions for getting a >> very small instance of CloudStack up and running while I have been on >> planes. I think that

Re: CloudStack User Research

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Jason Pavao wrote: > Hi Lynn, > We would like to POC with xenserver, but we don't have any licenses, would > you be able to help us pro-cure some temporary licenses so that we could do > a poc with citrix xenserver? > > Let me know. > Thanks. > -jason > WOW oracle