On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:36:55PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Mike we should do that, can you file a doc bug? Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Cool...I wonder if that is something we should document since that is
> > technically a GiB?
I'd suggest that w
Mike we should do that, can you file a doc bug? Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Cool...I wonder if that is something we should document since that is
> technically a GiB?
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> In the code it looks lik
Cool...I wonder if that is something we should document since that is
technically a GiB?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> In the code it looks like they use 1024*1024*1024
> On Feb 17, 2013 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the API, when we talk
In the code it looks like they use 1024*1024*1024
On Feb 17, 2013 11:37 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the API, when we talk about GB, do we mean GiB or literally GB?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com