Posted the review for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:15 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host H
Created CLOUDSTACK-988
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Just because it&#
itrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:40 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Yes it can be stored in host_details table but then given that all hosts in a
> cluster have same version the data woul
some validation based on HV version.
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:51 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Storin
version details?
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:23 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> The 'hos
The 'host' table has a column 'hypervisor_version' but that doesn't get filled
(tried with XS and Vmware). For Vmware the column 'version' is populated with
HV version whereas in case of XS it has CS version appended with some timestamp.
There is another table 'host_details'. For XS saw that ther
