;>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:06 PM
>>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: RE: [DISC
0, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Koushik Das
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, Janua
gt;>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:06 PM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
>>>
>&
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:06 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Deploy
> -Original Message-
> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:06 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
>
> > -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 30 January 2013 10:30
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
>
> On Tue,
nesday, January 30, 2013 12:31 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
>
>Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create
>a resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them.
>Ideally
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create
> a resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them.
> Ideally, we need to be using the right http methods for a true restful web
> service.
Nice suggestion, while we
Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:31 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements
Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create a
resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them.
Ideally, we need
Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create
a resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them.
Ideally, we need to be using the right http methods for a true restful web
service.
Also about the length part, how then we allow user data to be of size 2kb
currently ?
+1 But if we are sending base64 encoded userdata as part of POST, we
can increase the limit even further.
-1 If userdata will be sent as part of GET query, based on the rfc [1]
and from the widely used ugliest web browser [2] the GET url length
should be <= 2000 (we're already exceeding that how w
+1
I agree we should increase the size of user data to >=44KB that can hold
32KB of real data that is base64 encoded.
-abhi
On 30/01/13 9:10 AM, "Hari Kannan" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I wish to propose increasing the size of userdata to be passed along with
>DeployVirtualMachine API - I have add
12 matches
Mail list logo
