gt; Cc: Chandan Purushothama; Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> It would be best to enable/disable this feature on a per hypervisor basis but
> if that's complicated adding a top level flag to enable/disable the
> functionality
> is reasonable.
>
> >
18, 2013 9:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Chandan Purushothama; Anthony Xu; Mice Xia
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> Animesh,
>
> Do you mean limit the capability by adding global configurations or adding in
> [global-setting-
dev@incubator.apache.org; Mice Xia; Chandan Purushothama;
Anthony Xu
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
Mice any comments to my email below.
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:03 PM
&g
inal Message-
> > From: Mice Xia [mailto:weiran.x...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:49 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
> >
> > Animesh,
> >
> > sor
9 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> Animesh,
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> 1. currently in master branch it supports both xenserver and vmware, for
> KVM it needs a new-versioned libvirt
Snapshot is
> affected / degraded
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:44 PM
>> To: 'Mice Xia'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang;
; Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> Folks following up on this thread looks like support for XenServer is still
> not
> settled.
>
> 1. Mice can we make the feature configurable for each hypervisor to
> enable/disable the feature
2. Test th
ed, not sure if
>it's a good idea to handle lock sync in them.
>
>Regards
>Mice
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:59 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang
>Cc: An
013 12:59 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang
Cc: Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
Not to nitpick but for better understanding of what Alex's comment on the vm
lifecycle.
I went through the commit and saw the code change below. This change
successfully a
;> - Does VM snapshot interfere with volume snapshot? Volume snapshot
>>today makes the assumption that it is the only code that's making
>>snapshots and can break if there are additional snapshots in between.
>>This is bad design in volume snapshot but unfortunately that
teps you provide on xenserver, all the
> > files (test1, test2, test3) are present, the function is not affected.
> > But as i have replied, volume snapshot (s2) is not a delta snapshot,
> > it is a full one. Users need to be aware of this if they want to use
> > both snapsh
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:44 PM
> To: 'Mice Xia'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang; Mice Xia
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> I see, snapshot
: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
On 02/13/2013 01:44 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> I am planning on testing this feature and wanted to know the list of
> hypervisors that support this feature.
>
> When I refer to the design document -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa
...@tcloudcomputing.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:26 AM
To: Alex Huang; Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
For now, Volume snapshot and VM snapshot cannot be taken at the same time, i.e,
it will check if there are active volume
]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:39 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
On 02/03/2013 03:09 AM, Mice Xia wrote:
> So...it seems there are still some consensus to be reached and the codes were
> not merged before 4.1 feature freeze. This will
...@tcloudcomputing.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:26 AM
To: Alex Huang; Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
For now, Volume snapshot and VM snapshot cannot be taken at the same time, i.e,
it will check if there are active volume
; Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
For now, Volume snapshot and VM snapshot cannot be taken at the same time, i.e,
it will check if there are active volume snapshots tasks when taking a VM
snapshot, and vice versa.
Another way to clear any
you’re pointing out.
--Alex
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:44 PM
To: 'Mice Xia'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang; Mice Xia
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
I see, snapshot manager detected the change in primary storage, and crea
pointing out.
--Alex
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:44 PM
To: 'Mice Xia'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang; Mice Xia
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
I see, snapshot manager detected the change in primary storage, and create a
full snapshot inst
snapshots simultaneously.
Regards
Mice
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
Sent: 2013-2-2 (星期六) 4:05
To: Alex Huang; Mice Xia; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
CS uses XenServer delta snapshot, snapshot manager
ne is
supported in a zone, volume snapshot or vm snapshot.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:54 AM
> To: Mice Xia; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
ave been passed to down to the java interface.
> > [
> > mice] I'll change it
> >
> > A small note: Would it be better to call it VM restore than VM revert?
> Revert really should be RevertTo which I think is in the code but is not
> consistent. Some
RevertTo which I think is in the code but is not
> consistent. Some places it's just REVERT (for example, the event is just
> revert).
>
> [mice] there is already RESTORE, which is restoring a destroyed VM to
> stopped. RevertTo is fine with me.
>
> -Mice
>
>
> --
is just revert).
[mice] there is already RESTORE, which is restoring a destroyed VM to stopped.
RevertTo is fine with me.
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:24 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Cc: Mice Xia
Subject
ould it be better to call it VM restore than VM revert?
> Revert really should be RevertTo which I think is in the code but is not
> consistent. Some places it's just REVERT (for example, the event is just
> revert).
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 4:44 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>
> Can we get Alex to review this? He is the designer of the state machine.
>
> On 1/30/13 5:26 AM, "Mur
Can we get Alex to review this? He is the designer of the state machine.
On 1/30/13 5:26 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 30/01/13 2:24 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>
>>Agreed.
>>Adding VM states are likely to have some side-effects, but for
>>moveVMToUser case, does it explicitly reject other transient
On 30/01/13 2:24 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>Agreed.
>Adding VM states are likely to have some side-effects, but for
>moveVMToUser case, does it explicitly reject other transient states such
>as stating/stopping/migrating?
>
>-Mice
No, it just accepts any state other than 'Running' (though it should
, 2013 4:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
On 30/01/13 1:14 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>Murali,
>
>I haven¹t tested all possible cases, but due to the fact possible VM
>state transits are defined by state machine, all operation
cks the operation if VM state is Running, but
will succeed if the state is 'RunningSnapshotting' which is un-intended.
>
>-Mice
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:12 PM
>
PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Potential impact and notes:
>>> * 4 new states are added to VM state Machine
Mice,
When the VM is in transient states (RunningSnapshotting, StoppedSnapsh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Potential impact and notes:
>>> * 4 new states are added to VM state Machine
Mice,
When the VM is in transient states (RunningSnapshotting,
StoppedSnapshotting), I see that you have taken care of vmsync. But have
you ensured that all the concurrent operations on the VM are blocked
I'll keep it open for 24 hours, if there is no objection during 24 hours , I
will merge it to master
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:11 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
On Jan 29,
e bringing in the feature, but it should probably get
documented before the release.
Sounds like your ready to merge!
+1 from me
> Regards
> -Mice
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:34 PM
&g
--Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> I would like to request merge of feature V
On 01/29/2013 03:35 AM, Mice Xia wrote:
I would like to request merge of feature VM snapshot to master
Review board:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9118/
Doc/spec
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots
Jira ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-68
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> I would like to request merge of feature VM snapshot to master
>
> Review board:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9118/
>
> Doc/spec
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots
>
> Jira ticket
> https://issues.apache.org/ji
37 matches
Mail list logo
