Hey guys,
This is great info - thanks!
I admit, however, that I still don't understand why we have the
shared/local storage type for Compute and Disk Offerings. It seems like
you could accomplish this with tagging. For example, if you only want the
Offering deployed to local storage, then use a
I don¹t think this behavior changed ever.
The reason for the hard check should be as follows
Imagine the tag is for premium offering and the customer is paying premium
for that. Now he says deploy vm with this offering and say there is no
host with premium tag left to deploy the vm.
Now if we don'
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> See inline
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.ap
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> See inline
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Comp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was a little surprised to see the Storage Type field when creating a
> Compute Offering recently.
>
> The options are Local or Shared.
>
> I guess I was thinking that if you had a preference for a VM running on
> local storage of t
See inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering
>
> Hi,
>
> I was a little surprised to see th
