> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 7:51 AM
> > To: Wido den Hollander
> > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Noa Resare
> > Subject: Re: Review Request: 4.1 deb packaging tomcat fixes
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 06,
apache.org; Noa Resare
> Subject: Re: Review Request: 4.1 deb packaging tomcat fixes
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > On 03/06/2013 04:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > >Wido / Noa:
> > >
> > >Is this read
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2013 04:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> >Wido / Noa:
> >
> >Is this ready to pull into 4.1?
> >
>
> I've been debugging the agent and common package the last couple of days.
>
> The packages themself seem to work, but
On 03/06/2013 04:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Wido / Noa:
Is this ready to pull into 4.1?
I've been debugging the agent and common package the last couple of days.
The packages themself seem to work, but it's all the small tweaks which
take time.
The agent package should be pretty stable
Wido / Noa:
Is this ready to pull into 4.1?
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:34:14PM +, Noa Resare wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/
> --
Let me know when you guys are ready to move it to 4.1. Thanks!
On Mar 2, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/
> --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/
---
(Updated March 2, 2013, 11:34 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Wido den H
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/
---
(Updated March 2, 2013, 11:34 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Wido den H
> On March 2, 2013, 4:35 p.m., Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > Seems partially right. This is against the 4.1 branch, correct? Since the
> > logfile fixes are already in master.
> >
> > Best practice is to check master first and cherry pick stuff to 4.1
Yes, this is against the 4.1 branch.
cher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/#review17302
---
Seems partially right. This is against the 4.1 branch, correct? Since
10 matches
Mail list logo