Re: Review Request: Adding empty shell for AWS guide in /docs

2012-09-03 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
> On Sept. 2, 2012, 10:21 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > This looks OK - but is there any reason to create the files first without > > content? This doesn't hurt anything to create an empty shell - but I don't > > think it actually is necessary. I thought that's what you wanted. And since I s

Re: Review Request: Adding empty shell for AWS guide in /docs

2012-09-03 Thread Jessica Tomechak
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6776/#review10988 --- Wouldn't advise using the word "guide" in the file name of a chapter

Re: Review Request: Adding empty shell for AWS guide in /docs

2012-09-02 Thread Joe Brockmeier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6776/#review10986 --- This looks OK - but is there any reason to create the files first wit

Review Request: Adding empty shell for AWS guide in /docs

2012-08-26 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6776/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Created two docbook empty sh