Hey Alena,
I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case for
having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have no outside
connectivity so no SourceNat service) by domain-admins and regular users. I
would like to be able to build a more complex networ
Not sure if this is a bug, but I have found in testing the Virtual Routers dump
their arp cash almost every 5-10 seconds.
This makes them loose connectivity if they live behind a perimeter firewall
cluster running floating IPs for gateway addresses (for example: Conntrack,
CRM/Pacemaker, VRRP)
I agree with John. Especially that there is still lots of "legacy" things to
clean up even after the release.
Maybe we should plan a design summit after the release ?
-sebastien
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:04 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> I think this is a great conversation to have, but maybe we should
First question I have is : how often your gateway cluster results in
unsolicited ARP broadcast i.e. how quickly the gateway is moving ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:15 PM
To: [email protected]
S
I can help as well but I'm MIA for the next 3 weeks on vacation. I'll start
looking into the current source tree configuration to see how we can
Mavenize.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I have limited amount of experience with M
"Can you go to the UI infrastructure->hosts: click "force reconnect "
for the host? After adding host failed."
--- tried to add host when create Zone - get http://prntscr.com/dhejo
--- UI infrastructure->hosts: click "force reconnect " for the host -
get an error http://prntscr.com/dhekr http://prn
Thanks for submitting patch. I took a quick look at the patch in general
things look good. It would be better if you can give quick context on the
ADX capabilities for better deatiled review. Some question I had was does
ADX has a virtual appliance? NAT capabilities? Also where do you want to
posi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6464/
---
(Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 9:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
-
System vms have a java agent running and all you need is to enable debug port
for the agent's java process. Add this "
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8998,server=y "
And then you can use eclipse on your machine to connect to this port and
private IP of system vms
I googled all the setting
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:31 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject:
Hi folks, I wanted to circle back on this and see if we can get to
consensus on what we want to do about VMware support, as the current
status isn't tenable for a release.
At present it looks like our options are:
* Remove VMware support from the default build and provide
instructions for acquiri
Wow each of these could be its own email thread.
>
> So we're < 3 days away from the proposed release candidate being cut.
> I'm not sure about other's opinion right now, but I think that we
> might have been overly optimistic in the target dates. The licensing
> issues alone are going to take lo
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> From a developer pov, I've been finding our current release rather difficult
> to follow on the mailing list. I appreciate Chip's work in sending daily
> updates on what's been done. I've been relying on it to monitor the release
> progress
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Ram Ganesh wrote:
> David,
>
> I am following it up. Should have the details in a day or two. So what's the
> requirement - making the jars available at a publically accessible URL with
> license text around it should suffice?
>
> Thanks,
> Ram
>
Ram:
Just foll
Mike:
Any update on this?
--David
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:17 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
>>> and 6.0.0-1)
>>>
>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:20:04AM -0400, Olga Smola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last weeks I had no activities as a committer, because I have a problem
> with development environment.
> When I started working on CloudStack I had remote deployed CloudStack that
> used real resources and it wasn't deployed by
Hi folks,
I originally thought that Selenium was just added as a convenience for
future testing plans
(tools/tooljars/cloud-selenium-java-client-driver.jar) but it seems it
is actually a dependency for the compile-testclient target.
Then I thought it shouldn't be a problem to move this and add th
On 08/08/2012 01:46 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:38 PM, David Nalley wrote:
(Disclaimer: nofi!)
Do people run Fedora on production platforms? Isn't CentOS/RHEL the
distribution for production and Fedora for Desktops and cutting edge test
machines?
Wido
You might be sur
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 11:32 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robert Schweikert
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/01/2012 10:48 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Nalleywrote:
On 08/09/2012 01:55 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Writing documentation, where?
Hi,
Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2012 09:23 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> My first idea is to get publican actually build some docs
> locally..
>
> wido@wido-desktop:~/repos/cloudstack/docs$ publican build --formats
> test --langs en-US --config=publican-all.cfg Failed to
> My first idea is to get publican actually build some docs locally..
>
> wido@wido-desktop:~/repos/cloudstack/docs$ publican build --formats test
> --langs en-US --config=publican-all.cfg
> Failed to load brand file:
> /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/cloudstack/publican.cfg at
> /usr/bin/public
On 08/09/2012 12:24 AM, Edison Su wrote:
Hi all,
Seems a lot of people are interested in how to add new storage support
into CloudStack. But frankly speaking, the current code is not well suited for
such kind of tasks, in term of maintainability and flexibility.
Now it's time to
Hi Chip,
I am almost through the entire build.
However puppet seems stuck at:
notice:
/Stage[main]/Puppet-devcloud/File[/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1]/ensure:
created
Downloading the tinylinux VM ?
-Sebastien
On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Edison (others),
>
IMHO, for now, considering the schedule of ACS4.0, i vote for 'remove VMware
support from default build'
Replacing it with other libraries in such a short period introduces risks and
large amount of test effort.
I'm not very familiar with vijava but in the long run I think we should use
someth
Crossposting this (x)
As noted on the list(s) previously :
All new wiki content will live at http://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK.
I've begun migrating the relevant spaces from
http://wiki.cloudstack.org to the apache hosted wiki.
I've taken up moving all content under the "Community" space to sta
Ewan: comments below.
David: response to your point about OSCON conversations in another
part of this thread is also below.
Generally, I'm sorry if I came off sounding like an alarmist. That
wasn't my intent. I just don't want us to have an impedance missmatch
between our "plan" and what's actua
On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
wrote:
> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
> only doing it as I find time. Hopefully one space a day will get us
> fully migrated in a week.
It is possible to migrate a whole space, with some catches (I've moved
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> wrote:
>
>> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
>> only doing it as I find time. Hopefully one space a day will get us
>> fully migrated in a week.
>
> It i
In continuation to the disucssion [1] to have publisher/subscriber event
notification mechanism in CloudStack I am proposing a framework for
delivering events to the in-process subscribers. This is slightly
in-contrast to the earlier discussion to have native rich notification
(callback, SMS, emai
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
> >> only doing it as I find time.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> I wonder if we can do the following:
>
> - Tag all emails about release 4.0 with something like "[ASFCS40]". This is
> to allow developers to easily identify 4.0 chains and prioritize it.
+1 - I'll start doing that myself, as of today.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> >
>> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Past
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
> >> only doing it as I find time.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:58:56AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett P
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:46:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> The defacto standard FLOSS license for documentation is the Creative
> Commons CC-BY-SA license[0] which has been specifically designed for
> documentation, both in source and final-form documents. Using this
> license will allow
Rajesh, is this done?
--David
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> Yes Ewan, I would be doing this work.
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:03 AM
>> To: cloudst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2012 11:12 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:46:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
>> The defacto standard FLOSS license for documentation is the
>> Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license[0] which has been specifically
>> desi
On 08/09/2012 07:04 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
I think this is a great conversation to have, but maybe we should wait until
after the 4.0 release? Seems like it might be a bit of a distraction right now…
I have to agree on this. I'm not against this, but for me imho it's
rather hard to keep up
Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove out.
default is os default centos 6.2.
All the IPs share the same MAC and the gateway should not be "moving".
Again, no issues from a centos guest using it directly as a gateway. Issues
only when the VR is using it as a gat
On 08/09/2012 03:30 PM, David Nalley wrote:
My first idea is to get publican actually build some docs locally..
wido@wido-desktop:~/repos/cloudstack/docs$ publican build --formats test
--langs en-US --config=publican-all.cfg
Failed to load brand file:
/usr/share/publican/Common_Content/cloudstac
Having worked with the cloudbridge, and experimented ripping out soap, s3,
duplicated or unreferenced code, the module becomes quite small, apart from
generated classes. There is hardly any state, and certainly not highly
relational state.
What I'm getting at is that I see no reason to make small
> Ah, thanks! That gets me a bit further:
>
> Beginning work on en-US
> Validation failed:
> cloudstack.xml:6: validity error : Element book content does not follow the
> DTD, expecting ((title , subtitle? , titleabbrev?)? , bookinfo? ,
> (dedication | toc | lot | glossary | bibliography | preface
This is what I sent to legal-discuss. I'll report back if I get any
response.
- Forwarded message from Joe Brockmeier -
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:00:08 +
From: Joe Brockmeier
To: Apache Legal
Subject: Documentation Licenses: CC-BY-SA 3.0?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
The Cl
I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I
wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use
VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to do
that.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mai
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I
> wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use
> VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to
> do that
I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on legal-discuss
from Greg Stein:
"The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
"Software" term. The ALv2 is applicable to documentation. Please use
that for all doc.
Cheers,
-g"
See: http://markmail.org/message/wswgys56yelbd44
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> > I prefer the same option "
I'm later than normal today, sorry about that. Lots of meetings this
morning. Keep in mind that this list is for source files only, and
doesn't represent the outstanding issues with binary dependencies.
Specific individuals that have open questions to them below: Alex,
Prachi, Frank, Ewan
Upda
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Jason Bausewein to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
there is no need to go via the patch submission process.
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:10:47 -0400, Will Chan wrote:
The issue with using some open source version of the vmware SDK is that
it is not as well tested as the official one.
Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor SDK/API
or even their CLI tools? The point of cloud a
Am working on it.
Done removing EC2 from Hibernate dependency. Committed the patch locally and
testing is almost done.
Will send patch for the same by tomorrow.
Removing Hibernate dependency in S3 project is going on. I would be sending the
patch for it by end of this week.
Thanks
Rajesh Batta
It's an honor to work with you guys. Thanks for letting me contribute to such
a great project.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: new committer: Jason Bausewein
Th
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
> Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor
> SDK/A
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jason Bausewein
wrote:
> It's an honor to work with you guys. Thanks for letting me contribute to
> such a great project.
>
> Jason
Congratulations Jason!
-chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/
---
(Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 5:45 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prat
Thanks for your feedback.
Here are list of capabilities in the current patch:
* There is no virtual appliance for ADX as of now. The Virtual ADX itself is in
development. So CloudStack support for software LB is not available in this
patch.
* Brocade ADX will be LB provider in advanced zone only
Put up on reviewborad https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/. Please review and
provide feedback.
Implementation based on [1] below. The hierarchical configuration that was
discussed for enabling local storage support at multiple levels
(pod/cluster/host) can be added as another checkin.
Thanks,
Ko
> From: David Nalley
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 6:08 AM
>Subject: Re: CloudStack gathering around LinuxConNA?
>
>On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 11:32 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2012 01:00 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on
> legal-discuss from Greg Stein:
>
> "The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
> "Software" term. The ALv2 is applicable to do
+1
This is what drove us to choose the vendor SDK originally.
Kelven
On 8/9/12 10:36 AM, "Will Chan" wrote:
>> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support wa
>
> awsapi/.classpath
> utils/.classpath
> Alex, can you please correct these files? The headers were removed by a
> commit you made yesterday.
>
It will take me a little time today as I'm in a all day meeting. Will checkin
after work.
--Alex
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> awsapi/.classpath
>> utils/.classpath
>> Alex, can you please correct these files? The headers were removed by a
>> commit you made yesterday.
>>
> It will take me a little time today as I'm in a all day meeting. Will
> checkin aft
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 02:04:41PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 01:00 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on
> > legal-discuss from Greg Stein:
> >
> > "The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
> > "Software" ter
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> I've removed the Base64 file from the utils branch.
>
>> Sun Licenses:
>> Alex is working on removing these files, and pulling in a jar during
>> build.
>> We'll need to add the CDDL licensing to the NOTICE file once that work's
Yes. Refer to the review description.
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:33 AM
To: Koushik Das
Cc: Radhika Nair; [email protected]
Subject: Does the fix for CS-15631 affect documentation?
Koushik,
Do you think this chang
Pradeep / Edison,
I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
the deps folder. Can I remove it?
I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap row in the dependencies wiki page.
If yes, I'll remove from the source tree and from the tracking page.
Thanks!
-chip
On Thu,
Ram / Kevin,
I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead ssh library from the
project. Have you been able to get that going?
The latest comment on the "Actions" column of the deps wiki page
notes: XXX remove and use another ssh c
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:51:50 -0400, Edison Su wrote:
From: Mice Xia [mailto:[email protected]]
...
For following scenarios I need some suggestions:
a) 'vm snapshot, detach volume and attach it to another VM, rollback
snapshot',
This is not a problem. A volume and it's (several) s
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Pradeep / Edison,
>
> I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
> the deps folder. Can I remove it?
>
> I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap row in the dependencies wiki page.
>
> If yes, I'll remove from th
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:22 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> Pradeep / Edison,
>>
>> I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
>> the deps folder. Can I remove it?
>>
>> I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap ro
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:46 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just a quick update on this. I created the deps-ctrl branch off of
> master now that I actually have something to show.
>
> If you take a look under deps you'll see it looks pretty bare. I've
> removed a number of the jars.
>
> T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 9:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Ram / Kevin,
>
> I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
> Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead ssh library from the
> project. Have you been able to get that going?
>
> The latest comment on the "Actions" col
Frank,
There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
It's a BSD license, so I don't think it's an issue. However, I don't
want to add it to the NOTICE and LICENSE files unless we plan on
keeping it for th
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:09:30 -0400, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case
for having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have
no outside connectivity so no SourceNat service)
You "think"? Do people here not have
I know that there's a LOT going on right now, so blogging may not be top
of mind for folks - but it'd be good if we could get this sorted out.
While everyone is working on getting 4.0 out the door is *exactly* when
it'd be good if folks were blogging about what they're doing and perhaps
helping to
Looks like a pretty dusty library. Why not sshj?
-A
On Aug 9, 2012 1:01 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Ram / Kevin,
> >
> > I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
> > Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead
+1 I agree,
Getting this going before September would be awesome and help push the
Apache CloudStack brand to a wider audience for the 4.0 release.
Kelcey Jamison-Damage
Infrastructure Systems Architect
Backbone Technology | Backbone Datavault | Backbone IT Services
55 East 7th Ave Vancouver -
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
> releases.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:09:30 -0400, Hugo Trippaers
> wrote:
>
>> I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case
>> for having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have no
>> outside connectivity s
That was me. I let it slip onto the back burner but will see what progress I
can make this week.
John
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I know that there's a LOT going on right now, so blogging may not be top
> of mind for folks - but it'd be good if we could get this sorted o
On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:55 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>>
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:31
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:55 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child
On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Frank,
>
>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
>
>It's a BSD license, so I don't think it's an issue. However, I don't
>want to add it to the NOTICE an
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>Frank,
>>
>>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
>>
>>It's a BSD license, so I don't thin
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
wrote:
we dont have VLAN capable switches
I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even
the cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLAN tags. What you
can't do, is control at the port level which
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
>
>
>> we dont have VLAN capable switches
>
> I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even the
> cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLA
On 8/9/12 1:52 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
>> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>
>>>Frank,
>>>
>>>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>>>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it i
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I am almost through the entire build.
>
> However puppet seems stuck at:
>
> notice:
> /Stage[main]/Puppet-devcloud/File[/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1]/ensure:
> created
>
> Downloading the tinylinux VM ?
>
> -Sebastien
>
>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> On 8/9/12 1:52 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>>
Frank,
There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checkin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6500/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adds Apache license to all n
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>> Hi Chip,
>>
>> I am almost through the entire build.
>>
>> However puppet seems stuck at:
>>
>> notice:
>> /Stage[main]/Puppet-devcloud/File[/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1]/ensure:
>
On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>>> Hi Chip,
>>>
>>> I am almost through the entire build.
>>>
>>> However puppet seems stuck at:
>>>
>>> notice:
>>> /Stage[main]/Puppet-d
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
>> releases.
>>
>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
>
>
>> we dont have VLAN capable switches
>
>
> I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even
> the cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLA
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> [Snip]
>
> The thread started because the current system isn't really a system,
> it's just a folder full of binary jars which we were advised against
> (and saw another incubator project taken to task by the IPMC). As I
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
> releases.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Na
Hi folks,
First, I apologize for bringing up another non-release related
discussion topic.
There have been a couple of times where the issue of the existing
cloudstack.org email addresses have come up - and it's now on our todo
list[1]
== The current situation ==
cloudstack.org currently provid
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
