RE: [cloudstack-devel] Differences of parameter "capacityused" between Type2 and Type3

Hello, all who helped on this question. And thank you Nitin! > This has been identified as a bug on KVM. > http://bugs.cloud.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14597 > Is there any one who knows this bug is fixed on CloudStack 3.0.2? If not so, would this be fixe

Re: Changing a network service offering rate limit

On 5/14/12 2:46 PM, "James Kahn" wrote: >Geoff, Alena, > >Thank you. > >Does this require instance restart to take effect? It appears that traffic >is throttled guest to guest within the same guest network. XenServer 6.0. No, it doesn't require user vms restart. When network is upgraded, we re

Re: Changing a network service offering rate limit

Geoff, Alena, Thank you. Does this require instance restart to take effect? It appears that traffic is throttled guest to guest within the same guest network. XenServer 6.0. Cheers, JK. James Kahn | Managing Director | idea 11 pty ltd e: jk...@idea11.com.au | p: 07 3458 9060 | m: 0410 615 324

Re: Changing a network service offering rate limit

On 5/14/12 2:27 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" wrote: >James, > >The official way is to create a new network offering then apply it to the >required networks. > >If there are a large number of Accounts then do it via the API > >Kind Regards > >Geoff Higginbottom >CTO / Senior Consultant >ShapeBlue Ltd

Re: Changing a network service offering rate limit

James, The official way is to create a new network offering then apply it to the required networks. If there are a large number of Accounts then do it via the API Kind Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Senior Consultant ShapeBlue Ltd geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com ShapeB

Changing a network service offering rate limit

Is there a way to change a network service offering rate limit after deployment? We have a network offering set at 200Mbps (default) that we would like to change to 1Gbps with the least disruption to instances. - JK.

[RESOLVED] Re: Unable to deploy VM with "unable to allocate vnet as a part of network" log message

Thanks Alena! That solved the problem! Jose. On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 5/14/12 12:03 PM, "Jose Rozanec" wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >We were able to setup cloudstack, but when attempting to create VMs, we > >get > >an alert with

Re: Unable to deploy VM with "unable to allocate vnet as a part of network" log message

On 5/14/12 12:03 PM, "Jose Rozanec" wrote: >Hello, > >We were able to setup cloudstack, but when attempting to create VMs, we >get >an alert with the following message: "Unable to create a deployment for >VM" > >Looking at the logs (http://pastebin.com/mbQ6zCJT), we see the "unable to >allocate v

Unable to deploy VM with "unable to allocate vnet as a part of network" log message

Hello, We were able to setup cloudstack, but when attempting to create VMs, we get an alert with the following message: "Unable to create a deployment for VM" Looking at the logs (http://pastebin.com/mbQ6zCJT), we see the "unable to allocate vnet as a part of network" log message. >From >here

RE: console proxy question

The fix is not in 3.0.2 but I'll try to make it available in 3.0.3 release Kelven > -Original Message- > From: Tamas Monos [mailto:tam...@veber.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:04 AM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: console proxy question > > Hi Kelven, >

Fwd: Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1

I forgot to include the following information that I found in the database after the host was added: mysql> select * from host where id=22 \G; [...] private_ip_address: 10.0.0.16 private_netmask: 255.255.254.0 private_mac_address: e8:9a:8f:22:9b:c4 storage_ip_address: 10.0.0.16 storage_netmask

Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1

First of all, it is not very clear whether or not this patch is required for XenServer with regard to the Cloud Supplemental Pack: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14655 Could someone shed some light on this? Secondly, I'm having an issue with CloudStack trying to use my "cloud-private" n

RE: console proxy question

Hi Kelven, Thanks for the heads-up. Is that fix included in 3.0.2? Regards Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012 Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000 Veber: The Hosting Specialists

RE: console proxy question

The decision of replacing with new VNC engine is primarily due to our shift to ASF, previous console proxy uses third-party open source software that is not compatible to ASF license policy. The screen resolution problem has been fixed for certain hypervisors like VMware, however as there is an

console proxy question

Dear All, I'm just having a thought about the console-proxy implementation in cloudstack. In 3.0.0 we had a console proxy that was able to follow screen resolution changes while from 3.0.1 upward this is gone. I saw on the devel list someone wrote/replaced the console-proxy part for some reason.