Hi,
This bug says that VDI data is unrecoverable, but I've been able to
recover it twice.
Do a Xen snapshot for this VDI, then clone it. Now change CS DB entry
for the old VDI and put the new one. You VM should start.
Good luck!
Paco
On 18/07/12 02:59, Jason Davis wrote:
> Anyone have any info
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:58:06PM -0400, Evan Miller wrote:
> Please see the two attached snapshots.
>
> The dashboard view shows only one running VM, while the Instances view shows
> two running VMs. If the Dashboard view intends to only show VMs for a
> particular
> account, it should explicit
Never mind ... After applying the XenServer Platinum License (never expiring)
to the new host, the
host joined the cluster. Apparently, the default, limited license doesn't work
for a second host added to
a cluster in a Basic Network Setup.
Regards,
Evan
From: Evan Miller [mailto:evan.mil...@c
Running CloudStack Management Server:
v3.0.2.1
On:
[root@cumulus management]# uname -a
Linux cumulus.eng.citrite.net 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 6 19:48:22
GMT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@cumulus management]#
Hypervisor :
XenServer v6.02
Hi:
Please see attached l
>From the logs, it looks like the data volume of this VM already has a pool
>assigned. But since deployment planner did not pick it up for reuse, they may
>not be in READY state
Need to know what state the volumes for this VM are in and also the status of
the pool to which they are assigned to.
> -Original Message-
> From: sebastien goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:26 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DevCloud host-only interface
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Messa
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebastien goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 12:34 PM
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: DevCloud host-only interface
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at
> -Original Message-
> From: sebastien goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 12:34 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DevCloud host-only interface
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Mess
Hi Prachi,
The snippet for job-2384 can be found downloaded from
https://citrix.sharefile.com/d/s0e5a844f0e84dd1a
It's a bit long for cut and paste, but here's a download link that will remain
active for a year.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.co
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebastien goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:41 AM
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: DevCloud host-only interface
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to add
SSVM and CPVM are deployed automatically; VR gets deployed along with the
first user vm in the network. CloudStack shouldn't have allowed you to
remove the host when there are system vms running on it (vm type doesn't
matter here); if it did - it's a bug. Please file it.
-Alena.
On 7/17/12 11:50
I used the Basic Network Setup Wizard to setup my cloud.
So, those three "system" VMs were automatically created for
me. That's the context for my use of the term "automatic".
Regards,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Evan Miller
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:47 AM
To: 'cloudstack-users@i
These guys were running:
s-1-VM
v-2-VM
r-4-VM
but were created by CSMS behind the scenes.
What I meant was there were no VMs that I explicitly created using
the GUI by "adding an instance" that were still running.
In my opinion, if CSMS automatically creates VMs (say those three system VMs),
the
On 7/17/12 11:20 AM, "Evan Miller" wrote:
>host id=1 was always removed using the API.
>
>I don't believe any non-system instances were ever running when
>deleteHost was executed.
>
>No error was ever observed after running deleteHost API.
>
>Regards,
>Evan
But in your previous email you've me
host id=1 was always removed using the API.
I don't believe any non-system instances were ever running when
deleteHost was executed.
No error was ever observed after running deleteHost API.
Regards,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
> -Original Message-
> From: sebastien goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:41 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: DevCloud host-only interface
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add a host-only interface to the DevCloud VM, so that I
> can h
Hi Donal,
Can you provide entire snippet for the job-2384? Looks like a new pool got
assigned to the already created data disk and since it is not recreatable, the
new pool cannot be used.
The log snippet might help showing why a new pool is assigned.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: D
Using a long running CloudStack 3.0.3 deployment, I came up against a
StorageUnavailableException error when starting a VM that had been created in
the stopped state.
Any suggestions on how to narrow down the problem further?
Snippet from management server logs:
2012-07-17 12:04:19,107 DEBUG
Hi Edison,
I think it would be doable with X-Forwarded-For as workaround in some
cases.
For Apache:
-
SetEnvIf X-Forwarded-For ^10\.1\.1\. proxy_env
Order allow,deny
Satisfy Any
Allow from env=proxy_env
I've done this multiple times due to construction we had at our datacenter
and faulty racks (Damn you APC and you not-lined up racks!)
So there are a couple of ways to do this, so I'll speak from my experience.
1. Shut down all user VMs.
2. Place primary storage pools into maintenance, this will
Hi,
I am trying to add a host-only interface to the DevCloud VM, so that I
can have other VMs (not nested ones) on the same internal network.
I have a centOS 6.2 VM setup with host-only and it works as expected.
Somehow the eth1 that I added to DevCloud in /etc/network/interfaces
receives all the
21 matches
Mail list logo
