Edison,
I have added not a new template in management server through the web ui but
an iso file containing CentOS. And this from this ISO file that I have
tried to create new instance. When adding CentOS 6.3 I have selected Other
Linux (64b). If I follow you correctly, do you suggest that I create
hi, everybody
i have a trouble, when i start secondary storage vm and Console Proxy VM。
cloudstack-management.log follows:
2012-12-06 15:12:54,105 WARN
[storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.Agen
Hi All:
I have been setting up cloudstack4 dev environment on widows following
the instruction of
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Setting+up+a+CloudStack+dev+environment+on+Windows
There are some problem while deploying the database with command of "mvn -P
developer -pl d
More Info, this just appears via the API. The API client thinks my
primary storage is local storage, when it is shared. Cloudstack itself
then looks for local storage and fails, since the storage is actually
shared.
On 12/05/2012 12:25 PM, Nik Martin wrote:
If I add primary storage of type
The issue is about how to start a PV vm on Ubuntu xen inside devcloud. By
default, if the template os type is "centos 6" and beyond, cloudstack will
start the vm as HVM VM. If template os type is "centos 5.5", it will start a PV
vm, and the default centos 6 ISO support PV, so I think you can cha
In DeployVMCmd API, looks like you can specify IP in default network.
@Parameter(name=ApiConstants.IP_ADDRESS, type=CommandType.STRING,
description="the ip address for default vm's network")
private String ipAddress;
I'm not sure if it works, you might want to try it out.
CS UI doesn't pro
If I add primary storage of type "PreSetup", cloudstack thinks this
storage is local, when it is in fact shared storage. Is there a way to
set this storage as shared? I have a remote system that makes
cloudstack API calls that request shared storage, and the call fails,
with this error:
201
Jonathan,
Thinking over the CloudStack as a whole, I'm not sure that would be such a
good idea. Since secondary storage is shared across a zone, and you could
have separate PODs for different hypervisors to create a mixture you
wouldn't be able to utilize VMware template storage for XenServer, KV
That's the problem: the template is there. I can download it from
Cloudstack and use it with VMWare directly; it doesn't work when I attempt
to instantiate it within Cloudstack.
--Jim L.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Tamas Monos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The answer is in the logs:
>
> Template 208
Is there any feature requests to use VMwares Template system rather than
cloudstack inbuilt one on the secondary storage?
Regards,
Jonathan Bastin
Peer Point Internet Ltd
Technical Architect
Mob: 07739668262
--
Hi,
The answer is in the logs:
Template 208 is not found on and can not be downloaded to pool 200
Cannot use this pool Pool[200|NetworkFilesystem] because we can't propagate
template
Can you confirm your template is in Ready state and not corrupted?
Regards
Tamas Monos
Hmmm. That means that we have to recreate a new image for VirtualBox like
Rohit did for Debian Wheezy to start now DevCloud using CentOS. That could
be interesting if a CloudStack user could share such a image to avoid that
we spend so many times when we simply would like for testing purposes to
us
But i can see Vm status Expunging and Ip address is reserved when I do
a mysql query. Is any any global settings other than tuning
expunge.delay and expunge.interval?
-Original Message-
From: giljae o [mailto:ogil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 3:45 PM
To: cloudstack-u
As far as I know "sufficient resources" dose not only mean resources on
XenServers.
It could be ip addresses and so on.
Hi, Charles. That script only allows adding a non-HVM XenServer/XCP
host (it disables the HVM check performed by CloudStack). It won't let
you boot HVM mode VMs since XenServer/XCP require AMD-V / VT-x to do so.
Try running a supported Linux OS in a PV mode VM as Anthony recommended.
Best regar
So I should create a new host using web ui. Will try to make a test
tomorrow.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marc Cirauqui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now when adding a host it does not check for hvm and you should be able to
> boot VMs... Never tried though...
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Char
Hi,
Now when adding a host it does not check for hvm and you should be able to
boot VMs... Never tried though...
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I have run the MySQL script. So what should be the next step now ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
> On Wed,
Hi Marc,
I have run the MySQL script. So what should be the next step now ?
Regards,
Charles
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Marc Cirauqui wrote:
> Check this out...
>
>
> http://docs.cloudstack.org/Knowledge_Base/How_to_use_CloudStack_without_Hardware_Virtualization
>
> thx
>
>
> On Tue,
18 matches
Mail list logo