Re: Multiple instance creation issue

Thank you for your answer. Reguarding the VMware limit, I know that vCenter allows running 8 concurrent tasks / jobs. Thanks for your attention. Gaspare On 2013-02-08 08:19, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > I believe VMware commands are run serially. We'll need a dev to confirm. Kelven, Vijay, any

Re: Multiple instance creation issue

I believe VMware commands are run serially. We'll need a dev to confirm. Kelven, Vijay, anybody? Ahmad On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Gaspare A Silvestri wrote: > Hello everybody, > > when i try to concurrently create multiple instances, with different > scenarios (same template, different te

Multiple instance creation issue

Hello everybody, when i try to concurrently create multiple instances, with different scenarios (same template, different templates, same user, different users), I have to wait that the first (async) creation job has been completed to execute the second, and so on. Where could be the problem

RE: Data disk not recognizing with windows XP

I assume you are using XenServer, Looks like you didn't install xs-tools in windows XP VM, without xs-tools guest platform uses IDE controller , which doesn't support disk hot plug, you need to reboot windows VM, then the data-disk will show up. Or you can install xs-tools in cloudstack, this is

Re: Port number

Thanks Prateek for the clear port info. On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: > Following is list of non standard ports used by various entities in > cloudstack: > > From IDE/debugger to management server: 8787 (used to attach a remote java >

Re: Port number

Following is list of non standard ports used by various entities in cloudstack: >From IDE/debugger to management server: 8787 (used to attach a remote java debugger to MS). Management server to Management Server (cluster): 9090 (Used if multiple MS are deployed in a cluster) Agent to Management

Re: Setting root/Administrator password & SSH keys

Some additional information: >>>3) the template must have an ssh-key pulling script (cant recall the >>>full name but its posted on wiki) that is ran when it starts up. Yes, the template should be a ssh-key script enabled template. That means it should have a script /etc/init.d/cloud-set-guest

Re: mgmt VM access to VPC

Hi Alex, I've actually been working on a similar problem myself. If I understand your solution, it's to use a shared network connected to each tier of the VPC. If this is correct, surely you are 'breaking' the VPC model as you have now connected each Tier to a common shared network, meaning t

RE: ACS - Better Marketing - YOUR HELP IS NEEDED

Sonny, I agree with you, the CS design is very good and keeping it in line with incubating site - would be even better. Thanks for the awesome work, can't wait to see it. Ilya -Original Message- From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:14 P

Re: mgmt VM access to VPC

An update on this. It seems there are currently 4 viable options for solving this VPC mgmt access problem, summarised below. Thanks Chip and Alex (minor questions in-line). > We're trying to set up a VPC/nTier-App such that a single VM (call it a > management node) outside the VPC has ssh ac

VM Password Change

Excuse me please, I have problem with changing password on pass.enabled template, all working properly except UI, it says "Password has been reset to undefined" from instance.js On virtual router there is changing of password and on VM instance too, but new password couldn't be seen on UI beca

RE: ACS - Better Marketing - YOUR HELP IS NEEDED

Hey Ilya, I'm playing around with redesigning the current incubation site for people who are onboarding or want to learn about CloudStack for the first time. I'll send out a design proposal and plan on discussing this with Joe, Mark, David as to how we can get this off the ground. CloudStack h

RE: Setting root/Administrator password & SSH keys

If memory serves me right: Initial setup: 1) You import you SSH public key into CS 2) when you import your template initially, you define what ssh keypair to use for this template (this is done in 3.0.x 4.0.x via API call, I don’t know if it changed in 4.1 - ask on cloudstack-dev list) 3) the te

RE: Setting root/Administrator password & SSH keys

On 07.02.2013 23:22, Musayev, Ilya wrote: We should file this as enhancement request. Presently SSH keys are set via API call when you import the template into CS. Your template must have the SSH keys script as well. I found some old bug for 2.2, looks like the devs didn't find it a worthy fe

RE: Setting root/Administrator password & SSH keys

We should file this as enhancement request. Presently SSH keys are set via API call when you import the template into CS. Your template must have the SSH keys script as well. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 6:13 PM To: Cloudstack u

Setting root/Administrator password & SSH keys

Hi, Guys, in the UI I can't see anything related to the root or Administrator password (for Windows VMs) or a place where average Joe could upload his ssh key. Any pointers? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Configuring static routes on VM

Not at all. He is raising a valid point. The current code is actively rejecting external elements for vpcs. I'm already working on a fix for that as we want to use our Nicira stuff with vpc as well. It looks like its a trivial fix, as it used to work before this restriction was put in. There a

Re: Configuring static routes on VM

Hugo - Mind taking a look at the questions that Jeff has? On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Jeffrey McGovern wrote: > So after more research I found this > article > which > is where we are trying to get to in terms of our networ

Re: Configuring static routes on VM

So after more research I found this article which is where we are trying to get to in terms of our network design. As I was reading through the Inter-VLAN routing link it mentions the following: "In vpcOffering you define which services

Re: Questions about KVM storage backends and resize/migrations

On 07.02.2013 21:28, Bryan Whitehead wrote: NOTE: I have an infinband/IPoIB interconnect so glusterfs has all the IO it needs. I easily can push 130MB/sec write speeds inside a VM with kvm/qcow2 backed setup. Nice.. I don't have all that fancy stuff, just regular (bonded) gigabit, the max

Re: Questions about KVM storage backends and resize/migrations

I'm currently using glusterfs as a SharedMountPoint with great success. I've had server failures and HA smoothly powered up VM's that got hit without a hitch. (Each VM host has about ~4TB contributing to a volume with replica=2). I've also been able to migrate VM's around for maintenance on specifi

Re: SystemVM offline causes extreme snapshot bloat

sounds painful. thanks for sharing this though. Hopefully someone can gain value from this, and incorporate this into their operations. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Bryan Whitehead wrote: > This is on cloudstack 3.0.2. I had already removed all the snapshots in > the cloudstack UI. So from th

Re: SystemVM offline causes extreme snapshot bloat

This is on cloudstack 3.0.2. I had already removed all the snapshots in the cloudstack UI. So from the cloudstack point of view there was zero snapshots when in fact there was many more. The libvirt guys in #virt IRC were able to help me clean up all the internal snapshots on the qcow2 file via "v

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

ok, phew. Our convo did go private for an email or two. Lucian did have to make an effort to bring it back. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > no we did not ! > > I like reading you guys having a chat, it's very instructive. > > thanks > > -sebastien > > On Feb 7, 2013

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

no we did not ! I like reading you guys having a chat, it's very instructive. thanks -sebastien On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > boogers, i think everyone missed out on this convo because of the awesome > new reply modifications. > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ahma

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

boogers, i think everyone missed out on this convo because of the awesome new reply modifications. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > yes, exactly. > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Nux! wrote: > >> On 07.02.2013 19:13, Ahmad Emneina wrote: >> >>> i believe what you w

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

yes, exactly. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 07.02.2013 19:13, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > >> i believe what you want to do is have 2 nics on the host. 1 for guest >> traffic (public) and another for management traffic (private). Giving a >> hypervisor a public ip is not advisable

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

On 07.02.2013 19:13, Ahmad Emneina wrote: i believe what you want to do is have 2 nics on the host. 1 for guest traffic (public) and another for management traffic (private). Giving a hypervisor a public ip is not advisable. So in this case, could I connect all hypervisors and management serv

Re: Cloudstack Console Not Working

Hi Basha Ye had orginally thought it was firewall related and had temporarily turned off all firewalls to rule it out. But I could still not connect to the console, after your email I went on the process hunt for firewall processes but could not find one up anywhere. Thanks very much for your res

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

On 07.02.2013 19:03, Ahmad Emneina wrote: Reserved POD IP's are used for your system vm's (console proxy, secondary storage AND virtual routers). You want to accomodate for more than enough ip's to support the expected amount of accounts. You definitely DONT want public ip's for that range. You

Re: [best practices] reserved system IPs

Reserved POD IP's are used for your system vm's (console proxy, secondary storage AND virtual routers). You want to accomodate for more than enough ip's to support the expected amount of accounts. You definitely DONT want public ip's for that range. You dont need to place management server on that

[best practices] reserved system IPs

Hello, When adding a Pod I'm asked for a "reserved system IP range". Who exactly will be using this range? Do I need to assign an IP address from this subnet on the management server, too? Can these IPs be private? If yes, what's the purpose of "reserved system gateway"? Must they be in the s

RE: Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.0.0 : problem with virtual router

This issue is fixed in 4.0.1. Refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-595. > -Original Message- > From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:06 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject:

Re: secure cloud

got it On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > > what kind of security levels we have in cloudstack to secure data. > > Generally, CloudStack doesn't take responsibility for the data that end > users of a cloud place on

Re: secure cloud

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > what kind of security levels we have in cloudstack to secure data. Generally, CloudStack doesn't take responsibility for the data that end users of a cloud place on their virtual machines. CloudStack is focused on orchestrating virtual

Re: secure cloud

what kind of security levels we have in cloudstack to secure data. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:34:18PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > > are we using ciphercloud software to secure cloud data > > To the best of my knowledge, Apache CloudStack doesn

Re: secure cloud

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:34:18PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > are we using ciphercloud software to secure cloud data To the best of my knowledge, Apache CloudStack doesn't have anything related to ciphercloud in it.

Re: secure cloud

are we using ciphercloud software to secure cloud data On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:15:58PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > > Are we using ciphercloud software to encryption schemes that can be used > to > > secure cloud > > Sorry, I'm not understan

Re: secure cloud

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:15:58PM +0530, S.M Basha wrote: > Are we using ciphercloud software to encryption schemes that can be used to > secure cloud Sorry, I'm not understanding your question. Can you please clarify?

RE: statically routed IPs on VMs

On 07.02.2013 17:09, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: There is a multiple ip address per nic feature for campo release https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/multiple-ip-address-per-nic.html Can you please tell us what are the steps you followed ? Did you add any security group egress rule ? Thanks, Ja

Re: statically routed IPs on VMs

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:39:29PM +0530, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > > There is a multiple ip address per nic feature for campo release > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/multiple-ip-address-per-nic.html > > Can you please tell us what are the steps you followed ? > Did you add any security

Re: restrict user from a certain zone

Private zones are reserved for a specific domain. Only users in that domain may create guests in that zone. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:39 PM, S.M Basha wrote: > Agree with Pranav. Above the reply the same. > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Nux! wrote: > >> On 07.02.2013 17:05, Pranav Saxen

Re: restrict user from a certain zone

Agree with Pranav. Above the reply the same. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 07.02.2013 17:05, Pranav Saxena wrote: > >> I think while deploying the zone , you can uncheck the "public" >> checkbox in the zone wizard which will make the zone private for a >> user . >> > > Thanks

RE: statically routed IPs on VMs

There is a multiple ip address per nic feature for campo release https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/multiple-ip-address-per-nic.html Can you please tell us what are the steps you followed ? Did you add any security group egress rule ? Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Nux!

RE: restrict user from a certain zone

On 07.02.2013 17:05, Pranav Saxena wrote: I think while deploying the zone , you can uncheck the "public" checkbox in the zone wizard which will make the zone private for a user . Thanks, Pranav, I just replied to myself with the same solution. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg tec

Re: restrict user from a certain zone

On 07.02.2013 16:55, Nux! wrote: Hello, Is there a way to restrict a user from using certain Zones? I would like to have an "internal" zone that only certain users can use. Lucian And to answer myself, the best thing I could find is not to create the zone as Public: "Public. A public zone is

RE: restrict user from a certain zone

I think while deploying the zone , you can uncheck the "public" checkbox in the zone wizard which will make the zone private for a user . -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:26 PM To: Cloudstack users Subject: restrict user from a c

restrict user from a certain zone

Hello, Is there a way to restrict a user from using certain Zones? I would like to have an "internal" zone that only certain users can use. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On 07.02.2013 16:37, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Nux! wrote: Hi, By total chance I was using Chrome (24.0) today instead of Firefox (stock EL6, 10.0.12 ESR) and when creating a new zone on Chrome it offers me "VLAN, GRE or STT" whereas this dropdown menu is not vis

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > By total chance I was using Chrome (24.0) today instead of Firefox (stock > EL6, 10.0.12 ESR) and when creating a new zone on Chrome it offers me "VLAN, > GRE or STT" whereas this dropdown menu is not visible in Firefox. See the > images: >

Re: Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.0.0 : problem with virtual router

Thanks for your help. We will try a new upgrade tomorrow, with a manual cleanup. Le 07/02/2013 17:19, Tamas Monos a écrit : Hi, I had the same problem during a 3.0.2->4.0.0 in my test environment. During upgrade when the new virtual router is being restarted with the new template then a new VO

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:27:20PM +, Nux! wrote: > On 07.02.2013 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: > >Thanks, but bugs.cloudstack.org is the old tracker, you should use > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK > > Voila: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1194 > https://

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On 07.02.2013 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: Thanks, but bugs.cloudstack.org is the old tracker, you should use https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK Voila: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1194 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1195 -- Sent from the Del

RE: Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.0.0 : problem with virtual router

Hi, I had the same problem during a 3.0.2->4.0.0 in my test environment. During upgrade when the new virtual router is being restarted with the new template then a new VOLUME entry is being created. So you end up with like: 200 | NULL | 31 | 0 | ROOT-31 | 5e10aa83-828e-4c44-9237-a8d96f358706 |

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On 07.02.2013 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: Thanks, but bugs.cloudstack.org is the old tracker, you should use https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK facepalm.. I'll try to open again in the new tracker. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

Thanks, but bugs.cloudstack.org is the old tracker, you should use https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK Regards. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 07.02.2013 15:38, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> >> Sounds like we should clean that up. Do you mind opening a bug (or two >>

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On 07.02.2013 15:38, Chip Childers wrote: Sounds like we should clean that up. Do you mind opening a bug (or two really) for those issues? Sure: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-17323 http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-17324 Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technolo

Re: Bug with the web interface (re isolation method)

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:35:42PM +, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > By total chance I was using Chrome (24.0) today instead of Firefox > (stock EL6, 10.0.12 ESR) and when creating a new zone on Chrome it > offers me "VLAN, GRE or STT" whereas this dropdown menu is not > visible in Firefox. See the ima

Re: Launching VMs COnsole using the CS4 APIs

There is a single sign on key that is used in conduction with a api key and a secret key to transfer the control transparently to the vm console. This is how custom portals can provides seamless access to the vm console. There are several steps required to configure it. Some insight is provided her

Re: Cloudstack Console Not Working

Noel, "No route to host" Most likely iptables rule prevents the port from accessing. First check iptables rule in your VM, then check SecurityGroup rules in CloudStack. Finally check the rules in host where the VM is running BR Basha On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Noel King wrote: > Hi Bash

Re: Cloudstack Console Not Working

Hi Basha Thanks for quick feedback, I had already tried this when attempting to ssh onto these VMs, but could not connect "No route to host", however this is working when ssh onto the Virtual Router Kind regards Noel On 7 February 2013 14:38, S.M Basha wrote: > http://www.tutkiun.com/2012/0

Re: Cloudstack Console Not Working

http://www.tutkiun.com/2012/06/login-to-system-vmsrouters-cloudstack.html Try this On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Noel King wrote: > Hi, > > I am having issues with viewing the console on cloudstack 4.0 and hoping > you can help me trouble shoot this problem. On clicking the webpage I am > ge

Re: Puppet user-data

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT) wrote: > Are there advantages or disadvantages of pulling userdate from the virtual > router compared the get things from the cloudstack API? > Which is the preffered way? > So I've seen others use group (which is queryable via the API)

Re: cloudstack add ovm host occur error

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:20:44AM +, Tariq Iqbal wrote: > Hi Chip, > > Thanks for the link to the thread below - so is the conclusion that OVM will > be fixed in a future release? > As of right now, I'm not aware of anyone actively working on adding that support back. I believe that the ge

Cloudstack Console Not Working

Hi, I am having issues with viewing the console on cloudstack 4.0 and hoping you can help me trouble shoot this problem. On clicking the webpage I am getting the "Web page cannot be found", my investigation uncovered the following scenario - System VM (Secondary and Console) are not accessibl

Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.0.0 : problem with virtual router

hi, we have upgrade our Cloudstack from version 2.2.14 to 4.0.0, according to http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/pdf/Release_Notes/Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-Release_Notes-en-US.pdf The database upgrade works fine. UI too. Then we had

RE: Port number

Basha, The following "Citrix CloudPlatform networking, technical deep dive" webinar also explains the ports CS uses: http://www.shapeblue.com/2012/11/14/citrix-cloud-technologies-webinar-series-register-now/ Regards, Tariq Iqbal S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447909911600 tariq.iq...@sha

RE: Share Benefits of CloudStack

Basha, You can find some great blogs on CloudStack providing an architecture overview on our website: http://www.shapeblue.com/cloud-orchestration-blog/ There is also webinar series we ran towards the end of last year that covered various aspects of CS: http://www.shapeblue.com/2012/11/14/citr

Re: statically routed IPs on VMs

On 07.02.2013 13:24, Nux! wrote: And to answer myself after trying, yes it is possible. I just tested and it works, but I don't really understand how come iptables allows me to use on the VM some random statically routed ip, but doesn't allow me to "steal" an IP from the DHCP range. Can anyone en

Re: workarounds

sure. thanks mate On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: > This a open question it will be good if you can put down some situations > that you think will require workarounds. > > -abhi > > On 07/02/13 4:12 PM, "S.M Basha" wrote: > > >what kind

Re: workarounds

This a open question it will be good if you can put down some situations that you think will require workarounds. -abhi On 07/02/13 4:12 PM, "S.M Basha" wrote: >what kind of immediate workarounds available when we have issues with >cloudstack. >What are the basis information that we check when

Re: statically routed IPs on VMs

On 07.02.2013 12:40, Nux! wrote: Hi, I need to have multiple IPs per NIC in a VM. I'm currently running of a Basic Zone. Is it possible, as far as cloudstack is concerned, to statically route an e.g. /29 to $IP, where $IP is the DHCP assigned address on the VM? Lucian And to answer myself aft

Re: Launching VMs COnsole using the CS4 APIs

Admita, My suggestion was that you could map a port forwarding rule on the virtual router to the VM you just created then use your portal to direct the end user to the appropriate IP / Port combination. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44(0)20 3603 0542 | S: +44(0)20 3603

Re: "Waiting for $ip.realhostip.com" when opening the VNC window

Hi, realhostip.com is the default domain used when you launch a console proxy session. It's required as there is a wildcard SSL certificate on the system used to secure the connection. You can replace it with your own certificate and domain name combination if you wish.

statically routed IPs on VMs

Hi, I need to have multiple IPs per NIC in a VM. I'm currently running of a Basic Zone. Is it possible, as far as cloudstack is concerned, to statically route an e.g. /29 to $IP, where $IP is the DHCP assigned address on the VM? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

RE: workarounds

You can also check the agent/hypervisor logs to if something went wrong in agent. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:25 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE

RE: Add new IP range to guestNetworkForBasicZone

On 07.02.2013 12:13, Abhinav Roy wrote: Hi Lucian, You can browse to this location in the management server Infrastructure ->Zones- > BasicZone -> Physical Network -> Guest -> IP Ranges, and add the address range. Thanks! Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! ww

"Waiting for $ip.realhostip.com" when opening the VNC window

Hi, Can anyone advise why there are HTTP requests to $ip.realhostip.com when I'm opening a VNC window for a guest? Any way to disable this? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

RE: Add new IP range to guestNetworkForBasicZone

Hi Lucian, You can browse to this location in the management server Infrastructure ->Zones- > BasicZone -> Physical Network -> Guest -> IP Ranges, and add the address range. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, February 07,

Re: Share Benefits of CloudStack

Hi, Yes, some of user using DevCloud that provided as virtual appliance. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud And I know some of user tried with nested virtualization environment(KVM on ESXi, ESXi on ESXi etc...) In addition, if you'd like to know CloudStack architec

Add new IP range to guestNetworkForBasicZone

Hello, How can I edit the guestNetworkForBasicZone, during the initial wizard I was asked to input an address range to be used for guests, which I did, now I'd like to add another range. Where do I look? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

RE: workarounds

We have a troubleshooting page in the wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/troubleshooting.html You are free to edit, and add your issues so that others will be benefited. -Original Message- From: S.M Basha [mailto:smbash...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:12 PM To

RE: workarounds

If you are interested in what was the cause for the issue , you need to check the management server logs . That will tell you the entire stack-trace for the exception which is thrown . Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: S.M Basha [mailto:smbash...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, Febru

Re: Port number

Pl. see INSTALL.md for latest info on ports used by CloudStack; >From my last update on the file: Apache CloudStack uses some ports, make sure at least those used by the management server are available and not blocked by any local firewall. Following ports are used by Apache CloudStack and its en

RE: RE：RE: cloudstack add ovm host occur error

Hi, As per Chip's reply, OVM has been broken in CloudStack from before it's donation to Apache and is unlikely to be fixed in the forthcoming release. Are you looking to use OVM in production or are you just exploring? Regards, Tariq Iqbal S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447909911600 tariq.iq...@s

RE: Launching VMs COnsole using the CS4 APIs

Hi , I think I need to re-phrase my question. Our application uses CS4 for creating the VMs on VMWare. We need to give user the access to the VM terminal from the Application portal (and not from CS console). Is there any way to do that? Thanks and Regards. Asmita Patil Vagyani. Tech Lead,  Si

RE: cloudstack add ovm host occur error

Hi Chip, Thanks for the link to the thread below - so is the conclusion that OVM will be fixed in a future release? Regards, Tariq Iqbal S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447909911600 tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com] Sent: 07 February 2

Re: Share Benefits of CloudStack

Got it. Thanks for the videos. Can we setup cloudstack environment at home lab? Regards Basha On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: > Google the benefits it ! > > Features are here > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/software/features.ht

RE: Puppet user-data

Are there advantages or disadvantages of pulling userdate from the virtual router compared the get things from the cloudstack API? Which is the preffered way? -Original Message- From: Johann Hoehn [mailto:johann.ho...@ecommerce.com] Sent: Freitag, 1. Februar 2013 17:07 To: cloudstack-use

Re: Share Benefits of CloudStack

Google the benefits it ! Features are here http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/software/features.html On 07/02/13 2:55 PM, "S.M Basha" wrote: >Hi, > >Please share the benefits and features of cloudStack. > >-- >Thanks & Regards >S.M.Basha > > "If opportunity doesn't knock the door; open t

RE: Share Benefits of CloudStack

Hi, There are plenty of resources available on CloudStack - use your favourite search engine ;-) But a good starting point is the CloudStack website: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/ You can find the CS features here: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/software/features.html And so

KVM Snaphshot failed Cloudstacl 4.0

Hi at all, This is a Info: i have some errors after Upgrade from Cloudstack 3.0.2 to 4.0. One of this are Snapshots do not work with KVM. Try a cloud-agent restart. If this not work look for inactive storage pools on the hypervirsor and remove them. 1.) virsh pool-list --all 2.) virsh pool-un