Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Shanker Balan"
To: ""
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:04:08 PM
Subject: Re: Problems starting management server
Hi Aniket,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1623
Regards.
--
Shanker Balan
Managing Consultant
M: +91 98860
Bumping this thread. Adding in users to see if anyone else has seen this.
I am running into the exact same issue. XenServer 6.0.2, Basic networking
with bridging with CSP installed. However I am using CS 4.0.1.
My issues arised after I rebooted my XS host outside of CS (I believe this
was due to
My virtual router has connectivity problems.
I am able to start an instance but it is not able to get an IP address from
the vr. If I assign a static IP address (telnet to the 590x port on the
host) to the instance I am able to connect to it.
If I connect to the vr using the link local ip on the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:02:48AM +0800, Jerry Jiang wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I have known CS support to deploy multiple management node to bring into
> workload balance functions.
>
>
>
> In this case, do we need to buy a load-balance hardware (like F5) to install
> in front of several
You can also use HAProxy, a free software one.
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
Matt
On 3/14/13 9:02 PM, "Jerry Jiang" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>
>
>I have known CS support to deploy multiple management node to bring into
>workload balance functions.
>
>
>
>In this case, do we need to buy a load-balanc
Hello All,
I have known CS support to deploy multiple management node to bring into
workload balance functions.
In this case, do we need to buy a load-balance hardware (like F5) to install
in front of several management note?
Jerry Jiang
Hi, Shane. CloudStack depends on the hypervisor for OS support. Even
if there is an OS Type for the OS you want in CloudStack, it doesn't
mean it will actually work. If there is no OS Type, choosing one
similar to the OS you want may or may not work. You need to check the
hypervisor documentati
We are using our 612i22s SAN.
It works great with cloudstack.
Check them out at www.nfinausa.com
Warren
On 2013-03-14 15:10, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
I've been happy with glusterfs. for a sharedmountpoint kind of
storage. Works great.
(Note: invested in Infiniband to make things fast)
On Thu
Yes, that is correct. Each instance is getting it's own public ip and we are
setting up static-nat and firewall rules etc.
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Arms [mailto:ba...@dsscorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:02 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Gettin
Well , you can always set up a private zone by unchecking the public checkbox
in the zone wizard .
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Whitehead [mailto:dri...@megahappy.net]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:55 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: restricting users to a or Zon
I'd like to restrict users to a specific cluster in a zone but I don't
see that as possible. Am I correct in this statement?
Is there a way to restrict users to a specific Zone?
Assuming I trust my users and just give them a specific zone to use -
when I setup the zone can I just use the same sec
I've been happy with glusterfs. for a sharedmountpoint kind of
storage. Works great.
(Note: invested in Infiniband to make things fast)
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> I've seen several folks build their own storage clusters and use Nexenta.
>
> We use EMC VMAX.
>
>> ---
I've added several ISOs via management server and I've been attempting to add
instances from these ISO's. Once I complete the process and the instances is
started I connect to it via "View console" to walk through the OS install. A
common issue I'm having is that the install seems to be missing
Sandeep
Is it safe to assume you are using a different ipaddressid for each vm static
nat?
Brandon Arms
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Patni [mailto:sandeep.pa...@cumulogic.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:02 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Getting "504 Gate
I've seen several folks build their own storage clusters and use Nexenta.
We use EMC VMAX.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:52 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: What's everyone using for primar
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> For my testing, because of available resources, I chose local storage.
> However, shared storage (like GlusterFS or the like) is appealing. What are
> you using? Why did you chose what you're using? How many instances are you
> running? etc.
On 14.03.2013 16:16, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
We've got instance deployments down to a science, so the HA isn't as
important, but it is certainly appealing.
If performance is also an issue, than all the more reason to use local
storage.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
Yeah that too. :-) Sorry was looking at another installation when I was
typing. :-)
Still would need to be setup with the ESX hosts before it is attached to
the cloud since CS doesn't natively manage the VMFS pool. That's what I
was going after the most.
Thanks for getting me straight,
Matt
On
I guess you are talking about the "VMFS" choice in the menu since the
only options for primary storage and VMware are NFS and VMFS :)
On 2013-03-13 9:13 PM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
Francois,
If the ESX servers can attach to it for primary storage, I'm not sure why it
wouldn't work with the Pre
We've got instance deployments down to a science, so the HA isn't as
important, but it is certainly appealing.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 14.03.2013 15:27, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
>
>> For my testing, because of available resources, I chose local storage.
>> However, shared
On 14.03.2013 15:27, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
For my testing, because of available resources, I chose local storage.
However, shared storage (like GlusterFS or the like) is appealing.
What are
you using? Why did you chose what you're using? How many instances are
you
running? etc.
Thanks!!
Nothin
A FreeBSD NAS box based on ZFS, though you could also use opensolaris
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Matt. What are you seeing as the common platform for
> these shared storage setups?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Mathias Mullins <
> mathi
Thanks for the reply Matt. What are you seeing as the common platform for
these shared storage setups?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Mathias Mullins <
mathias.mull...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hey Kirk,
>
> Majority of our customers are using shared storage. It's actually a very
> low percentage
You should look into cloud-init as well.
Regards
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Anoop Mohan [mailto:anoo...@microland.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Password Script
>
> Thanks Shanker J
>
>
>
> From: Shanker
Hey Kirk,
Majority of our customers are using shared storage. It's actually a very low
percentage that are using Local storage because it basically negates all high
Availability and eliminates a lot of the useful features in CloudStack.
Local storage is usually what I refer to as "Use it and Fo
CK,
Make sure that your GHz on the offering on the CPU is not greater than the CPU
speed on the systems. but Suresh is right, something is saying that there is a
capacity allocation issue.
Thank you,
Matt
On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:35 AM, "Suresh Sadhu"
mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com>> wrote:
As
Hi Bjoern,
Thanks for your reply (and sorry for my late response) but I would like more
indication on how to do this: "Bridge on VLAN and don't use VLAN ID. That's the
combination I choose because I had trouble with the first solution.".
My main goal is to implement Cloudstack with advanced n
Thanks a lot!!
It would be simple organizing it this way by using multiple (in my
case) VMware datastores.
Thanks again,
Gaspare
On 14/03/2013 13:27, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
Gaspare
The limits are really related
Gaspare
The limits are really related to a single Primary Storage Volume, and as you
can have multiple volumes within a Cluster, and multiple Clusters within a
Zone, there are effectively no limits on how much storage a Zone can have.
In fact we always recommend at least two Primary Storage Vol
As per log your host doesn't enough capacity. Deployment allocation algorithm
fail to find the cluster having enough capacity to deploy a vm.
Can you check your host capacity in dash board and host status in the host
table or in UI(Infrastructure-Hosts] .
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Mes
Thank you everybody for your answers.
Excluding any consideration about the global capacities (for which I
also thank you), I can understand that you have confirmed that I will be
able to use more than 8TB of storage for every zone. Is this correct?
Thanks,
Gaspare
On 14/03/2013 08:48, Pau
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Bastin
wrote:
> Can I ask if the multiple IP per guest made it in for vmware.
I don't know, but this may not be the right thread of have discussion
on vmware start another thread maybe?
Regards.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jonathan Bastin
>
>
> - Reply messa
Can I ask if the multiple IP per guest made it in for vmware.
Regards,
Jonathan Bastin
- Reply message -
From: "Rohit Yadav"
To: "cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org"
, "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: CloudStack cloudmonkey 4.1.0-snapshot
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 08
As we are getting closer to 4.1.0 release, I want to take this
opportunity to ask people try out cloudmonkey 4.1.0-snapshot [2]. Pl.
note that it is not the official release yet but I published this on
pypi to encourage everyone to use the latest cloudmonkey,
comment/report-bugs before we'll releas
Thanks Shanker J
From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:35 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Password Script
Hi Anoop,
I have used the one in Github
https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudstack/blob/master/setup/bindir/
cloud-set-guest-password
Hi Wang,
I think the answer to your question is that in a production environment the
MySQL instance and the Management Server(s) are on separate boxes.
So that no client or infrastructure data is held on the management servers
themselves.
A new management server could be built and pointed at t
Hi Anoop,
I have used the one in Github
https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudstack/blob/master/setup/bindir/cloud-set-guest-password.in
Also have a ticket open to fix the documentation issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1316
Regards.
--
Shanker Balan
Managing Consul
Could some one point out the linux guest password script location
Seems the current is not available
Download the script file cloud-set-guest-password:
* Linux: http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password
Regards
Anoop
The information transmitted is intended only for the
Hi,
There's a nominal recommended limit of (as I recall) 8TB per primary storage
pool. But this is a finger in the air guess-timate.
The limit is really down to your infrastructure.
When we talk about the number of VMs a host can support we're looking at not
only the host's CPU and memory res
39 matches
Mail list logo
