> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:44 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: CS 4 Database integrity - mysql server performances
>
> +Alex since he is opinionated on this stuff.
&g
ject: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!
> >> >
> >> > I don't plan on mentioning all of these here, but for the first time I
> thought I
> >> would...
> >> >
> >> > The first bay area CloudStack meet up is being hosted by Br
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 7:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mgmt VM access to VPC
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:23:08AM +, Alex Heneveld wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > W
+1
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] [DISCUSS] Deprecate CloudStack apis and api server
>
Bharat,
A few comments.
- On your caveats, I think you should deploy 2b. Accept the change but not add
more VMs anymore. You can provide a warning.
- As for repeated alerts, that's a problem with the alert mechanism. It should
not repeat alerts. Fix it there.
On implementation:
- You need
>
> --
> Kraig Amador
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > Nux,
> >
> > I would say XenServer is the best supported hypervisor with KVM rapidly
> catching up. This is mainly because I've known quite a few XS product
Nux,
I would say XenServer is the best supported hypervisor with KVM rapidly
catching up. This is mainly because I've known quite a few XS production
deployments.
You'll find a lot of community members are on KVM and since it's been open to
apache, there's been a lot of contribution in KVM
That's incorrect. OVS GRE is implemented currently on XenServer and KVM but is
at prototype/demo quality. Nicira is on KVM, I believe. Hugo would know more
about that.
It is not the same as VPC and it is not from client to VR only.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mathias Mullins
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Isn't the Borg Collective already cloud based?
--Alex
I've had experience doing this. It involves
- Stop CloudStack
- copying everything from one secondary storage to another.
- change the references to that secondary storage in the database to the new
secondary storage. I can't recall all the places that need changing but it was
not a lot.
- res
Op stands for operations. It means entries in these tables are transitional
and are used for keeping track of the status of an operation.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 4:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-user
with backwards
> compatibility and also the fact that both ways needs to be tested and
> validated.
>
> Will
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:44 PM
> > To: cloud
Sorry I don't understand why it needs to be a vote. Why can't we just offer a
flag to turn it on and off?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:11 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudsta
>
> We should fix it so that it doesn't mean 'this'. :)
>
These are the arguments I have heard against "fixing" it.
- If you change it such that null means default, then what means don't care?
- If you're tiering storage, why wouldn't you tier the default storage?
It somewhat makes sense.
>
> Or does a empty tag mean just put it on some storage no mather of the
> storage tag?
It means this.
--Alex
The problem with using -users is that -qa will often have issues that are
raised during nightly testing, etc. Exposing users is often too much detail.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:12 P
> > I actually would like to completely get rid of that table and replace it
> > with a
> link to a public filter on Jira. (note the line on 4.1 release page that
> says " 4.1
> Feature List from Jira. Please someone add a filter add the link here. ")
> The
> filter should be on the release=[
> Alex,
>
> One thing I would like us to change is the contents of the
> "Contributed By" column. We're individuals here, and organizations
> don't have any standing. So for example, instead of Contributed By:
> Citrix for a particular feature I'd like it to either be the specific
> people invol
+1 I think wiki is good for more static stuff.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:kevin.kl...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:35 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cloudstack features wish-list
>
> In other communities I'
Here's another change on the wiki.
Prasanna put together an excellent page with CloudStack design documents. I
modified it slightly so that we have 4.1 and 4.0 design documents and so that
it's easy to add any design page. I added this page to the top level page. I
basically put the 4.1 feat
>
> I think Joe's primary planning / tracking tool for 4.0.1 has been Jira
> (which, IMO, is the right thing for bug-fix only releases).
+1 on using Jira. I actually tried to create a filter for 4.1 new features in
jira so I can link to that from the 4.1 wiki page but apparently I don't have
p
I added a Releases headline to cwiki. Under that headline is the 4.0 release
link and a 4.1 release link. The 4.1 release link points to an info page where
users and developers can get information on the status of the 4.1 release. We
can add links to jir searches that finds 4.1 bugs on this p
Trevor,
You should talk to XS about this. CloudStack should be fine with this setup
but you need verification on XS about whether it can sustain and whether
active/active is a supported bond.
--Alex
From: Trevor Francis [mailto:trevor.fran...@tgrahamcapital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 20
If you want to control this, wouldn't you orchestrate above CloudStack? Why
put it into CloudStack?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:48 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mail to the a
In 4.0, what I would do is this.
- Write a plugin.
- Listen to vm start events.
- On router vm start, ssh into the router vm and change the resolv.conf
In the next release, Murali have added proper external event system then you
don't even need to do this via a plugin.
--Alex
-Original M
James,
Currently it does not work that way. A DHCP server is deployed per network.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: James Jeffrey [mailto:james.jeff...@cpp.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:14 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: DNS Issue
For the guest IP
A quick check on devCloud, which uses XCP, shows that it's at version 1.6 so it
should be workable. However, that support has not been productized (never
officially QAed) and remains at developer support level. My understanding is
that XCP is always close to a version of XenServer so the effor
If I'm not mistaken from my limited knowledge of pom, you can set a
db.properties.override. If that file is there, it will use this file instead.
In there, you should be able to specify a remote mysql server.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.c
Arnaud,
Can you provide more information?
What are the networks and the network configurations you are deploying the VM
into? How did you setup your zone? Is this 3.x, 4.x, 2.x?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Gaillard [mailto:arnaud.gaill...@xtendsys.net]
> Sent: Tuesda
My question is: If I use B to create a vm, will it be allocated to host with
> tags?
Yes it will.
> Another question is, System vm will be allocated which place?
System VM can be allocated to any host. To force a system VM to a host with a
certain tag, you have edit the row for that system
It is fairly close, pending QA test completion currently. On a day to day
slip.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: bruc...@v365.com.au [mailto:bruc...@v365.com.au]
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 5:24 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: V4 Release Date?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nik Martin [mailto:nik.mar...@nfinausa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 12:27 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Storage failure in not handled well in CS
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-251
>
> On 10/0
; Subject: Re: How does XenCenter show stopped state when stop VM from
> CloudStack
>
> I dit it. A smail trick during stopping time.
>
> 2012/9/26 Nguyen Anh Tu
>
> > Thanks for your information, Alex. Looking for AutoScale feature!
> > However, I will try to do some
When CloudStack stops a VM, it completely takes out the VM meta information
from the XenServer database and then reconstructs it when it starts the VM.
You can't do anything unless you want to change cloudstack code.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Nguyen Anh Tu [mailto:ng.t...@gmai
; Thanks,
> Ram
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: 25 September 2012 07:57
> > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [AFSCS40] Rele
cheme until we have
> something to vote on officially?
>
> - chip
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been reminded that I've neglected to update the community on the
> c
Hi All,
I've been reminded that I've neglected to update the community on the current
status for CloudStack 4.0. I apologize for that oversight. From now til the
actual release, I will give a daily update on the status. If you feel anything
is missing, please let me know and I'll try to incl
Hi,
I've put together a high level release page so everyone can get information.
Please add and edit as you see fit. See [1].
--Alex
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release
loudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: really bad UI design
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > >
> > > To sum it up, let's say we need a fine grained Role Based Access
> > > Control
> > > (RBAC) model in CloudStack. Are
>
> To sum it up, let's say we need a fine grained Role Based Access Control
> (RBAC) model in CloudStack. Are we using anything specific now or is it just
> ad hoc code to handle the handful of cases that already exist?
>
Agreed ACL in CloudStack is limping. We're looking to change that and
in
Bharat,
Nice work. Something like this deserves front page status. We should make our
wiki's front page easier to navigate. For example, separate links for users
and developers. And then something like this can go into front page for
developers.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From:
In our experience, NFS has been much easier to operate than iSCSI. Many thinks
they understand iSCSI but it's not easy to get iSCSI + MPIO + multiple VDIs on
the same LUN often makes for a operations nightmare.
We haven't done straight NFS vs iSCSI performance comparisons but there are
papers
Is that also the priority order or is there no priority order?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 9:21 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
> d...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Supported br
It should be possible in KVM also. What you have to do is create a bridge with
the VLAN and then use that name as the name-label for the management network.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 1:25 PM
> To: clou
Kevin,
You can do this two ways.
1. Use RightScale
2. Roll your own solution by using userdata. In the userdata, you store
information about what each VM is supposed to become. Your template contains
puppet or chef scripts. Those scripts will access the userdata for that VM and
use that to
DB upgrades is one of the easiest things to unit test and there are previous
examples of how to unit test them. Please do the unit testing before checking
them in.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:26 AM
> To: clo
46 matches
Mail list logo
