-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 533 Error text: Unable to create a deployment for VM
On 14.02.2013 17:37, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> I think your service offering is looking
Hi Dean,
I can answer your question about the physical network mapping screen.
>>I click "next" and am brought to the Physical Network screen - with all the
>>nice drag-and-drop jquery stuff I am so fond of (nice touch guys). But this
>>is perhaps one of the most confusing parts there is. The
Hi Kristoffer,
I am working on a role-based access system feature and will send out a concrete
functional spec. when it is ready. The use case of granting user the access to
change password/generate keys will be considered as part of this work.
Please keep posting any more use cases you would e
All of these are heuristics applied by deployment planner and host/storagepool
allocators to deice the order in which resource(pods,clusters,hosts,storage
pools) will be considered for VM deployment.
random: This just shuffles the list of clusters/hosts/pools that is returned by
the DB lookup.
Allocator choices are as described below and the global confg param to use is
'vm.allocation.algorithm' and is set to randon by default.
About detecting 80% CPU/RAM usage - there are various cluster level thresholds
one can set through global configurations to track the capacity usage per
clus
Hi Marcos,
In the API's below, you specified tag 'guestv' for the physical network. But
the tag on the offering is 'guestv1' - That might be the reason for your
offerings dropdown to be empty.
Also, the error you got while using API for createNetwork indicates that your
offering does not suppo
The port at which awsapi listens has been changed to 7080.
I have updated the documentation here:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/EC2+API+support+in+CloudStack
Check the 'Tomcat Deployment' section.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt..
if my
pre-condition failed I would set a value of returnUpTo = 0 and call the
super.allocateTo() passing in the modified returnUpTo.
Thanks again for your help!
Amir
-----Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 201
heck
Hi Prachi,
So are you suggesting to set the returnUpTo value to 0?
To confirm, I can get the hostname of the guest VM from vmProfile.getHostName()
...this is correct?
Thanks for your feedback!
Amir
-Original Message-----
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: We
Amir,
Yes to add any custom checks on top of the existing host allocation you will
need to write your HostAllocator extending the default FirstFitAllocator. Also
replace the FirstFitAllocator in componets.xml by your custom allocator.
If your condition verification fails, your allocator should
>>>Is there a way to deploy a VM in a particular cluster? We would like to
>>>dothat, since we´re probably going to have different server models, with
>>>different licenses but we didn´t see any way to do that neither from the UI
>>>nor from the API.
You can do that by using host tags per clust
> It also looks like you need to escape the ampersand or surround with
>> quotes. -- your shell created 2 background jobs.
>>
>> On 7/18/12 10:52 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Sebastien.
>>>
>>>Seems docs need to be corrected
ULL ;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: 17 July 2012 22:43
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: startVirtualMachine fails on StorageUnavailableException
>From the logs, it looks like the data volume o
Hi Sebastien.
Seems docs need to be corrected. Looking at the authentication code, I see that
the REST query also needs:
1. AWSAccessKeyId (CS API key of the user)
2. Signature
3. SignatureMethod ("HmacSHA256" or "HmacSHA1")
4. Version (wsdlVersion mentioned I the ec2-service.properties of your
ive for a year.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: 17 July 2012 18:53
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: startVirtualMachine fails on StorageUnavailableException
Hi Donal,
Can you provide entire snippet for the job-2384? Looks
Hi Donal,
Can you provide entire snippet for the job-2384? Looks like a new pool got
assigned to the already created data disk and since it is not recreatable, the
new pool cannot be used.
The log snippet might help showing why a new pool is assigned.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: D
On 7/13/12 2:59 PM, "Evan Miller" wrote:
>Running CloudStack Management Server:
>v3.0.2.1
>On:
> [root@cumulus management]# uname -a
> Linux cumulus.eng.citrite.net 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 6
>19:48:22 GMT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@cumulus management]#
>Hyperviso
If you try to create a new VM using the network you have, a router should be
started by CS as part of the new user VM start.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Evan Miller [mailto:evan.mil...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subjec
To add on that: No need to stop the vms manually. When you put the host in
Maintenance, CS should stop all your VMs, if it's the only host in the cluster.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:10 PM
To: cl
One correction to option a) This fix is available in CloudPlatform 303 release,
not CloudStack. The next release of CS should have the fix.
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:25 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Hi Joris,
This is a known issues reported as bug 13944. Looks like you have hit this
issue where there are multiple physical networks.
There are two options to solve this:
a) This issue has been fixed in 303 version of CS, is there a possibility of
upgrading to 303 instead of 302?
b) One worka
21 matches
Mail list logo
