Will it be possible ?
Dan/borei.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Hi Murali,
Thanks for reply. I have F5 appliance which is absolutely empty, there are only
one account, two interfaces 1.1 and 1.2, no vlans. CS can login to it
successfully using admin credentials.
After that i created network offering with shared LB, created users network
using that offeri
affic (not sure
if it's gonna work for https offload). Hacking CS internals (modifying system
VMs) - yes it's possible, but it's not good idea for product of such level
because side effects are not predictable. Please need your help.
Dan/borei.
Hi all,
Is there any way to add one more system VM, basically i need VM which will be
in the same network with the hosts of the cluster/pod.
Dan.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
, because situation when host is not accessible
and presented in CS (in any state) very possible. I think enduser should be
able to remove host from UI, because doing so directly in the database you
don't know what exactly need to be updated/removed.
> Hi Dan,
> I understand your co
Hi Nitin,
I was thinking about it, but my concerns - it's direct databases intervention,
and i afraid that not all dependences will be satisfied (not all relationship
will be removed/updated).
> Hi Dan,
> I think you can just set the removed column for the particular host
> i
er-5:null) Cluster PDU 95529533441 -> 95529533442. agent: 0, pdu
seq: 193, pdu ack seq: 192, json:
<cut--->
Seems like CS can't communicate with agent on the host, and not happy about it.
But host is gone, and it c
but i don't see how to use it. If you could point me
to example it would be great.
Dan/borei. > Hi Dan,
> I agree with your suggestion. There is already an enhancement request
> filed for this kind of requirement. Please refer to
> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-6398
>
I can't view that link, seems like i don't have enough permissions.
> Hi Dan,
> I agree with your suggestion. There is already an enhancement request
> filed for this kind of requirement. Please refer to
> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-6398
> I would encourage
lem would
be public template with-in domain. That template should-not be visible for
other domains, so domain will be level of isolation. Private templates will be
like they now - only owner has to them.
What is the community opinion about it.
Dan/borei
--
17:40
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; Sheng Yang; d...@soleks.com
>> Subject: Re: DB schema upgrade script for CS 3.0.1 -> 3.0.2, probably bug.
>>
>> On 5/9/12 11:32 PM, "d...@soleks.com" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
works" and refusing to create network. If i don't do any
>> network assignment (network is going to default public pool) - it works
>> fine.
>>
>> Dan/borei
>>
>> ----
>> This message was sent
t;>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> I've found that DB schema upgrade script (CS 3.0.1 ---> CS 3.0.2) is
>> trying to drop non-existing index. Log is attached.
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
x27;t do any network assignment (network is
going to default public pool) - it works fine.
Dan/borei
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Hi All,
I've found that DB schema upgrade script (CS 3.0.1 ---> CS 3.0.2) is trying to
drop non-existing index. Log is attached.
Dan.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
2012-05-09 20:17:31,6
4 AM
> To: 'd...@soleks.com'
> Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding a public range for an account
>
> Dan/all,
>
> I?ve just done code review and some testing for the feature. Looks
> like it?s broken in 3.0.1.
>
> 4) mentioned in y
Hi All,
At this moment i utilize RFC networks (192.168.x.x spaces) as for public
networks. Is there recommended procedure to do conversion to real (routable) IP
address space ?
Dan.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet
IPs yet
5) Requesting public IP for my guest network which is 10.1.2.0/24 and getting
IP from 192.168.232.0/24 which zone wide network.
At this point i don't see any options to get IP from 192.168.233.0/24.
> Dan,
>
> First of all, adding public ip range per account will work only for
>
Alena,
Ok, that is pretty clear and logically, but why when I'm requesting new IP
using account with associated network, provided IP is coming from default
network, but not from allocated for that account.
> Dan,
>
> When public ip address range is created per account, al
Hi Salvatore,
Allocated "NULL" doesn't help, changing state to 'Free" doesn't help as well.
UUID for IPs from new network are NULLs. UUIDs for IPs from network created
during zone initialization are normal UUIDs.
> Hi Clayton,
>
> Are you receiving the error when you create the IP range, or ar
Clayton, it's borei, can you please post mine
Hi All,
I created new public network via infrastructure->zone->physical
network->public->IP range menu and assigned it to account in non-root domain.
Private network was also created for that account. When i use that account and
trying to request
Hi All,
I created new public network via infrastructure->zone->physical
network->public->IP range menu. and assigned it to account in non-root domain.
Private network was also created for that account. When i use that account and
trying to request IP, IP was chosen from default public network,
22 matches
Mail list logo
