Re: SSL certificates on servers in advanced networking zone

2013-02-01 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
unning a web server in an advanced >networking cloud has come up. Still the most widely supported method of >implementing SSL certificates on a web server is to have a dedicated IP >per SSL certificate. How can this be accomplished with advanced >networking in cloudstack? I d

SSL certificates on servers in advanced networking zone

2013-02-01 Thread Nik Martin
We launched our first public cloud a few weeks ago, and everything is going ok, but the issue of running a web server in an advanced networking cloud has come up. Still the most widely supported method of implementing SSL certificates on a web server is to have a dedicated IP per SSL

RE: advanced networking with kvm

2013-01-15 Thread Paul Angus
rport.be] Sent: 14 January 2013 18:51 To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: advanced networking with kvm how does one actually setup a cloudstack with kvm and advanced networking. The documentation is not really clear on this. For example do i need to create my bridges befor

Re: advanced networking with kvm

2013-01-14 Thread Ahmad Emneina
On 1/14/13 10:51 AM, "david van zeebroeck" wrote: >how does one actually setup a cloudstack with kvm and advanced networking. >The documentation is not really clear on this. > >For example do i need to create my bridges before i try to add the host in >cloudstack or d

advanced networking with kvm

2013-01-14 Thread david van zeebroeck
how does one actually setup a cloudstack with kvm and advanced networking. The documentation is not really clear on this. For example do i need to create my bridges before i try to add the host in cloudstack or do i let cloudstack create the bridge's. Also can you choose the name of th

RE: Is l3 switch mandatory to practice Advanced Networking Feature

2013-01-03 Thread Pranav Saxena
commonly used components. > > Thanks > ilya From: banuka prakash [mailto:banu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM To: Pranav Saxena Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; Kevin Kluge; Donal Lafferty Subject: Re: Is l3 switch mandatory to practice Advanced Network

Re: Is l3 switch mandatory to practice Advanced Networking Feature

2013-01-03 Thread banuka prakash
xactly trying > to do . For using some features of advanced networking , you can configure > a L2 switch as well. > > ** ** > > If you give some more information , few hardcore networking guys on the > community can definitely help you out. > > ** ** > > Re

RE: Is l3 switch mandatory to practice Advanced Networking Feature

2012-12-21 Thread Pranav Saxena
Hi Banuka , Without a L2 or a L3 switch , how would you create traffic isolation ? I am assuming you are trying to connect the ports of your two computers directly . Please give some more information on what you are exactly trying to do . For using some features of advanced networking , you

RE: Review Request: CloudStack Advanced Networking Tutorial

2012-11-30 Thread Boylan, James
-- James From: Musayev, Ilya [imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:45 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Review Request: CloudStack Advanced Networking Tutorial Please glance over and comment of what you think is wrong on this tutorial before I push it

Review Request: CloudStack Advanced Networking Tutorial

2012-11-28 Thread Musayev, Ilya
Please glance over and comment of what you think is wrong on this tutorial before I push it further to general public and begin referencing people to this guide. Lots of it is my understanding and result of trial and error. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Advanc

Re: Advanced Networking

2012-10-16 Thread Nik Martin
. I have been working for over a month to figure out why the floods occur, but we just cant seem to figure it out. The hosts are running Cent 6.3 and KVM HVs. Our goal was to have Management and Storage traffic go over Bond2, Guest traffic go over Bond1, and Public Internet traffic go over Bond0.

Advanced Networking

2012-10-16 Thread Trevor Francis
go over Bond1, and Public Internet traffic go over Bond0. We created physical networks in advanced networking with those settings and KVM tags corresponding to our bridge names. Our application requirement require that we have 2 ethernet connections assigned directly to the linux VMs (eth0

Re: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-17 Thread Matthew Patton
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:06:25 -0400, Clayton Weise wrote: This is fine except that with how things are right now the tagging happens on the hypervisor and not the VM I tried 'vconfig ethN ' and then 'brctl addif ethN.V'? but that doesn't work. You have to add the un-tagged interface (eth

RE: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-15 Thread Clayton Weise
ase it would be good for somebody to file a feature request for something like this. -Original Message- From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:00 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Netwo

RE: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Matthew Patton
Who cares if there are only 8 virtual NICs. Use ifaliases or define a multitude of VLAN interfaces that are bound to a suitable set of physical interfaces. For example I have 2 NICs in a bond connected to16 different public IP subnets. Some have different tags, others have the same tag b

Re: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
On 8/14/12 11:00 AM, "Clayton Weise" wrote: >> You simply add another block, on the same VLAN or another VLAN if you >>prefer > >While we're not he subject. How does CS determine when to use the new >block of addresses (in this case they will be on the same VLAN)? Does it >use one block until a

RE: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Clayton Weise
> You simply add another block, on the same VLAN or another VLAN if you prefer While we're not he subject. How does CS determine when to use the new block of addresses (in this case they will be on the same VLAN)? Does it use one block until all of the addresses in the range specified are gone

RE: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Will Chan
bottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:23 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking > > Clayton, > > You simply add another block, on the same VLAN or another VLAN if you > prefer > > Regards &

Re: Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
Clayton, You simply add another block, on the same VLAN or another VLAN if you prefer Regards Geoff On 14 Aug 2012, at 18:20, "Clayton Weise" wrote: We haven't run out yet, but we have currently allocated a single /24 for our public network. In an attempt to plan for the inevitable future

Adding Public IP Addresses in Advanced Networking

2012-08-14 Thread Clayton Weise
We haven't run out yet, but we have currently allocated a single /24 for our public network. In an attempt to plan for the inevitable future when we need to assign more addresses, is it as simple as adding another range or is there additional manipulation that needs to be done. I'm assuming ot