RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-05 Thread Tamas Monos
ge- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: 04 March 2013 15:27 To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support Thanks for the precision Jake. We are trying to use VMFS with an iSCSI backend, and we run into weird issues using 4.0.1. In fact

RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com] > Sent: 04 March 2013 21:12 > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support > > The trickiest part is getting all the network info corre

RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Musayev, Ilya
dstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support > > The trickiest part is getting all the network info correct each portion of CS. > > What tripped my up for the longest time was that the networks must have > the same labels as the vswitch names in vcenter. &g

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Jake G.
gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the clarification Chip. You are right. QA is testing 4.1 code >>>>> base against Esxi 5.1. >>>>> >>>>> However which version is vim51 going to be merged in to?? >>>>> >>>>> --

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Francois Gaudreault
s.com; Chip Childers Subject: RE: VMWare 5.1 Support Francois, We are actually testing Esxi 5.1 Can you log a defect to see if someone can pick it up to get it fixed. Chip, Sorry for not bringing it up in the forum earlier. This is testing only effort as we upgraded some of the HW. 4.1 code base has

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Jake G.
gt;>> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:59 PM >>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com >>> Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti >>> Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support >>> >>> So I understand the issue Francois and Sudha. >>> >

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-04 Thread Francois Gaudreault
] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:59 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support So I understand the issue Francois and Sudha. Sudha is saying that the QA folks are testing the 4.1 code against VMware 5.1. This relies on

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Jake G.
ubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com > Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti > Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support > > So I understand the issue Francois and Sudha. > > Sudha is saying that the QA folks are testing the 4.1 code against VMware > 5.1. This relies on the fact that VMware allows for s

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Francois Gaudreault
users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com; Chip Childers Subject: RE: VMWare 5.1 Support Francois, We are actually testing Esxi 5.1 Can you log a defect to see if someone can pick it up to get it fixed. Chip, Sorry for not bringing it up in the forum earlier. This is testing only effort

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Chip. You are right. QA is testing 4.1 code > base against Esxi 5.1. > > However which version is vim51 going to be merged in to?? No earlier than 4.2.0

RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support So I understand the issue Francois and Sudha. Sudha is saying that the QA folks are testing the 4.1 code against VMware 5.1. This relies on the fact that VMware allows for some forward

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Chip Childers
[mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > >Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:49 PM > >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com; Chip > >Childers > >Subject: RE: VMWare 5.1 Support > > > >Francois, > > > >We are actually testing Esxi

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Francois Gaudreault
PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com; Chip Childers Subject: RE: VMWare 5.1 Support Francois, We are actually testing Esxi 5.1 Can you log a defect to see if someone can pick it up to get it fixed. Chip, Sorry for not bringing it up in the forum earlier. This

RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
/sudha -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:49 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com; Chip Childers Subject: RE: VMWare 5.1 Support Francois, We are actually testing Esxi 5.1 Can you

RE: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
safely claim support for Esxi 5.1. Thanks /Sudha -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:25 PM To: Chip Childers Cc: Subject: Re: VMWare 5.1 Support Hi, Sure, we can help testing! On 2013-03-01 3:21 PM, Chip

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Francois Gaudreault
Hi, Sure, we can help testing! On 2013-03-01 3:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: VMware 5.1 support will, most likely, be in our next feature release (probably 4.2.0, scheduled for July). If you want to help with testing the vim51 branch, please do so! Report bugs here: https://issues.apache.org

Re: VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Chip Childers
VMware 5.1 support will, most likely, be in our next feature release (probably 4.2.0, scheduled for July). If you want to help with testing the vim51 branch, please do so! Report bugs here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK , and feel free to discuss issues and bugs on the

VMWare 5.1 Support

2013-03-01 Thread Francois Gaudreault
Hi, Do you guys plan to add the VMWare 5.1 SDK support in 4.1? I tested with the vim51 branch, but it seems I cannot add my cluster into CloudStack. We would love to see that support soon :) Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@