[Cluster-devel] cluster/cman/qdisk score.c

2008-01-24 Thread lhh
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL4 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 14:58:38 Modified files: cman/qdisk : score.c Log message: Unblock signals after fork() so heuristics using signals don't hang Patches: http://source

[Cluster-devel] cluster/cman/qdisk score.c

2008-01-24 Thread lhh
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL46 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 14:58:54 Modified files: cman/qdisk : score.c Log message: Unblock signals after fork() so heuristics using signals don't hang Patches: http://sourc

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:23:42PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > To summarize a phone conversation from today: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:02PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: > > J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> Would there be any advantage to enforcing that requirement in the > >> server? (For exa

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:19:58AM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:23:42PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >>> To summarize a phone conversation from today: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:02PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: >>> J.

[Cluster-devel] cluster/cman/qdisk score.c

2008-01-24 Thread lhh
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 17:00:55 Modified files: cman/qdisk : score.c Log message: Unblock signals after fork() so heuristics using signals don't hang Patches: http://source

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs/gfs_quota gfs_quota.h main.c Makef ...

2008-01-24 Thread adas
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 18:29:13 Modified files: gfs/gfs_quota : gfs_quota.h main.c Makefile Added files: gfs/gfs_quota : layout.c Log message: fix for bug 430133 - We

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs ioctl.c

2008-01-24 Thread adas
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 18:30:18 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: ioctl.c Log message: fix for bug 430134 - Added functionality to GFS_IOCTL_SUPER to provide metadata of the

[Cluster-devel] cluster/cman/qdisk score.c

2008-01-24 Thread lhh
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 18:42:12 Modified files: cman/qdisk : score.c Log message: Unblock signals after fork() so heuristics using signals don't hang Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvswe

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:23:42PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: To summarize a phone conversation from today: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:02PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: J. Bruce Fields wrote: Would there be any advantage to enforcing that requirement i

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs glock.c

2008-01-24 Thread bmarzins
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL51 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 20:08:43 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: glock.c Log message: Fix for bz #426291. gfs_glock_dq was traversing the gl_holders list without h

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:45:37PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> In practice, it seems that both the unlock_ip and unlock_pathname >> methods that revoke locks are going to be called together. The two >> separate calls therefore seem a little redundant. The reason we *need

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs glock.c

2008-01-24 Thread bmarzins
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 20:25:10 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: glock.c Log message: Fix for bz #426291. gfs_glock_dq was traversing the gl_holders list without ho

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs glock.c

2008-01-24 Thread bmarzins
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 20:42:01 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: glock.c Log message: Fix for bz #426291. gfs_glock_dq was traversing the gl_holders list without holding the gl_spin spin

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ...

2008-01-24 Thread rpeterso
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 20:51:46 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ioctl.h ops_file.c Log message: Resolves: bz 429633: gfs_tool doesn't recognize GFS file

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ...

2008-01-24 Thread rpeterso
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 20:54:31 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ioctl.h ops_file.c Log message: Resolves: bz 429633: gfs_tool doesn't recognize GFS file sytem Patches: http:/

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:45:37PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: J. Bruce Fields wrote: In practice, it seems that both the unlock_ip and unlock_pathname methods that revoke locks are going to be called together. The two separate calls therefore seem a little redunda

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ...

2008-01-24 Thread rpeterso
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL51 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 21:25:41 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: gfs_ioctl.h ioctl.c ioctl.h ops_file.c Log message: Resolves: bz 430154: gfs_tool doesn't recognize GFS file

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:06:49PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:45:37PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: >> >>> J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> In practice, it seems that both the unlock_ip and unlock_pathname methods that revoke locks are g

[Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] NLM failover unlock commands

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:06:49PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:45:37PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: J. Bruce Fields wrote: In practice, it seems that both the unlock_ip and unlock_pathname meth

[Cluster-devel] cluster/fence/agents/scsi scsi_reserve

2008-01-24 Thread cfeist
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL5 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 22:20:24 Modified files: fence/agents/scsi: scsi_reserve Log message: Added back in change to description line to make chkconfig work properly. Patches:

[Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs glock.c

2008-01-24 Thread bmarzins
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:cluster Branch: RHEL51 Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-24 22:23:47 Modified files: gfs-kernel/src/gfs: glock.c Log message: Oops. Reverted fix for bz #426291. It isn't going into RHEL 5.1 Patches: http://sourc

[Cluster-devel] conga/luci cluster/busy_wait-macro cluster/for ...

2008-01-24 Thread rmccabe
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:conga Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-25 00:36:59 Modified files: luci/cluster : busy_wait-macro form-macros luci/homebase : validate_cluster_add.js luci/site/luci/Extensions: LuciDB.py RicciQueries.py

[Cluster-devel] conga/ricci/modules rpm/PackageHandler.cpp rpm ...

2008-01-24 Thread rmccabe
CVSROOT:/cvs/cluster Module name:conga Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-25 00:38:51 Modified files: ricci/modules/rpm: PackageHandler.cpp RpmModule.cpp ricci/modules/service: ServiceManager.cpp Log message: Fix a few long-standing bugs that cau

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/3] NLM per-ip base grace period

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
The patch series enable setting of per ip base NLM grace period as a counter part of NLM unlock command described in: http://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2008-January/msg00151.html Example Usage: root-shell> echo 10.1.1.64 > /proc/fs/nfsd/resume_ip The command temporarily suspends NFS

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/3] NLM add resume procfs file

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
Add a new nfsd procfs file "resume_ip" to enable per-ip base lockd grace period: Example Usage: root-shell> echo 10.1.1.64 > /proc/fs/nfsd/resume_ip Only support IPV4 address for this patch submission. -- Wendy Add a new nfsd procfs file "resume_ip" to enable per-ip base lockd grace period:

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/3] NLM per-ip grace period - core

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
The logic is implemented on top of linux nfsd procfs with core functions residing in lockd kernel module. Entry function is nlmsvc_resume_ip() where it stores the requested ip interface into a linked-list nlm_failover_list. The list entry count is nlm_failover_cnt and access protection is done

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/3] NLM enable per-ip base grace period

2008-01-24 Thread Wendy Cheng
Hooks are added into the existing lockd global grace period checking to enable per-ip base grace period. -- Wendy Hooks are added into the existing lockd global grace period checking to enable per-ip base grace period. Signed-off-by: S. Wendy Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Lon Hohb