Hi,
On 30/05/18 20:24, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi,
Before this patch, frunction gfs2_trans_add_meta called list_add
to add a buffer to a transaction, tr_buf. Later, in the before_commit
functions, it traversed the list in sequential order, which meant
that they were processed in a sub-optimal orde
Hi,
Before this patch, frunction gfs2_trans_add_meta called list_add
to add a buffer to a transaction, tr_buf. Later, in the before_commit
functions, it traversed the list in sequential order, which meant
that they were processed in a sub-optimal order. For example, blocks
could go out in 54321 or
On 9 May 2018 at 15:21, Bob Peterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before this patch, frunction gfs2_trans_add_meta called list_add
> to add a buffer to a transaction, tr_buf. Later, in the before_commit
> functions, it traversed the list in sequential order, which meant
> that they were processed in a sub-opt
Hi,
Before this patch, frunction gfs2_trans_add_meta called list_add
to add a buffer to a transaction, tr_buf. Later, in the before_commit
functions, it traversed the list in sequential order, which meant
that they were processed in a sub-optimal order. For example, blocks
could go out in 54321 or