On Wed 28-07-21 09:57:01, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:34 PM Bob Peterson
> > wrote:
> > > On 7/13/21 1:26 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 13:09 -0500, Bob Pet
Hi,
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:34 PM Bob Peterson
> wrote:
> > On 7/13/21 1:26 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 13:09 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> >
> > Before this patch, gfs2 kept its own add
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:34 PM Bob Peterson wrote:
> On 7/13/21 1:26 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 13:09 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
>
> Before this patch, gfs2 kept its own address space for rgrps, but
> this
> caused a lockdep problem because vfs assumes a 1:1 re
On 7/13/21 1:26 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 13:09 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
Before this patch, gfs2 kept its own address space for rgrps, but
this
caused a lockdep problem because vfs assumes a 1:1 relationship
between
address spaces and their inode. One problematic
Hi,
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 13:09 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> Before this patch, gfs2 kept its own address space for rgrps, but
> this
> caused a lockdep problem because vfs assumes a 1:1 relationship
> between
> address spaces and their inode. One problematic area is this:
>
I don't think that is
Before this patch, gfs2 kept its own address space for rgrps, but this
caused a lockdep problem because vfs assumes a 1:1 relationship between
address spaces and their inode. One problematic area is this:
gfs2_unpin
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
mapping = page_mapping(page);
__set_page_
