On 30 May 2018 at 12:12, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/05/18 11:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>>>
>>> In that case, maybe it would be simpler to drop it for GFS2. Unless we
>>> are getting a lot of benefit from it,
Hi,
On 30/05/18 11:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
In that case, maybe it would be simpler to drop it for GFS2. Unless we
are getting a lot of benefit from it, then we should probably just follow
the generic pattern here. Eventua
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> In that case, maybe it would be simpler to drop it for GFS2. Unless we
> are getting a lot of benefit from it, then we should probably just follow
> the generic pattern here. Eventually we'll move everything to iomap, so
> tha
Hi,
On 30/05/18 10:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:30:32AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
I may have missed the context here, but I thought that the boundary was a
generic thing meaning "there will have to be a metadata read before more
blocks can be mapped" so I'm not
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:30:32AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> I may have missed the context here, but I thought that the boundary was a
> generic thing meaning "there will have to be a metadata read before more
> blocks can be mapped" so I'm not sure why that would now be GFS2 specific?
I
Hi,
On 30/05/18 06:50, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:43:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Just define a range of fs specific flags and use that in gfs2 instead of
exposing this internal flag flobally.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Looks ok to me, but better if the
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:43:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just define a range of fs specific flags and use that in gfs2 instead of
> exposing this internal flag flobally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Looks ok to me, but better if the gfs2 folks [cc'd now] ack this...
Reviewed-
