On 2/18/20 1:21 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:05:29PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
>> This is an easy review and obviously correct, so:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard
>
> Thanks
>
>> Thoughts for the future of the API:
>>
>> I will add that I could envision another
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:05:29PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> This is an easy review and obviously correct, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard
Thanks
> Thoughts for the future of the API:
>
> I will add that I could envision another patchset that went in the
> opposite direction, and
On 2/17/20 10:45 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
>
> ondemand_readahead has two callers, neither of which use the return value.
> That means that both ra_submit and __do_page_cache_readahead() can return
> void, and we don't need to worry that a present page in the
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:45:42AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
>
> ondemand_readahead has two callers, neither of which use the return value.
> That means that both ra_submit and __do_page_cache_readahead() can return
> void, and we don't need to worry that a
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
ondemand_readahead has two callers, neither of which use the return value.
That means that both ra_submit and __do_page_cache_readahead() can return
void, and we don't need to worry that a present page in the readahead
window causes us to return a smaller nr_pages
