Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:54 AM Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:40 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> > This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
> > plock operation should not send a reply back. Currently this is kind of
> > being handled in DLM
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:40 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
> plock operation should not send a reply back. Currently this is kind of
> being handled in DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE, but DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE has more
> meanings that it will re
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:57 AM Alexander Aring wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:49 AM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > > This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
> > > plock operation shoul
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:49 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
> > plock operation should not send a reply back. Currently this is kind of
> > being handled in DLM_P
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
> plock operation should not send a reply back. Currently this is kind of
> being handled in DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE, but DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE has more
> meanings that i
This patch introduces a new flag DLM_PLOCK_FL_NO_REPLY in case an dlm
plock operation should not send a reply back. Currently this is kind of
being handled in DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE, but DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE has more
meanings that it will remove all waiters for a specific nodeid/owner
values in by doing
