Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:05 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap
wrote:
which is not ideal, but I d
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:05 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid
Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap
>> wrote:
>>
>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
>>
> Take a look in fs.h:
>
> #define generic_se
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> wrote:
>
> > >>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
> > >>>
> > >> Take a look in fs.h:
> > >>
> > >> #define generic_setlease(a, b, c) ({ -EINVAL;
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> wrote:
>
> > >>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
> > >>>
> > >> Take a look in fs.h:
> > >>
> > >> #define generic_setlease(a, b, c) ({ -EINVAL;
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
> >>>
> >> Take a look in fs.h:
> >>
> >> #define generic_setlease(a, b, c) ({ -EINVAL; })
> >>
> >> If that wasn't a stupid macro, your code would have compiled and
Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:20:03 + Steven Whitehouse
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:13 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> The mm-of-the-moment
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:20:03 + Steven Whitehouse
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:13 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-01-14-20-31 has
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:20:03 + Steven Whitehouse
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:13 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-01-14-20-31 has been uploaded to
> > >
> > >http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:13 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-01-14-20-31 has been uploaded to
> >
> >http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >
> > and will soon be available at
> >
> >git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-01-14-20-31 has been uploaded to
>
>http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> and will soon be available at
>
>git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/mmotm.git
when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING=n:
mmotm-2009-0114-2031/fs/gfs2/ops_fi
11 matches
Mail list logo
