I'm currently using cmake for a variety of projects. Love it.
However, one feature I find myself missing more and more is one from
autotools configure scripts: AC_ARG_ENABLE().
That is, the ability to allow the configuration script (ie. cmake) to be
run with arbitrary flags to turn on or turn off
2007/8/8, gga [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm currently using cmake for a variety of projects. Love it.
However, one feature I find myself missing more and more is one from
autotools configure scripts: AC_ARG_ENABLE().
That is, the ability to allow the configuration script (ie. cmake) to be
run with
I follow the instructions of Install page
(http://cmake.org/HTML/Install.html) and with cmake 2.4.7 downloaded and
untar I run cmake .
but it shows this:
# cmake .
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- broken
The C compiler /usr/bin/gcc
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:45:07PM +0200, Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/8/7, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/8/6, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2) Those files MUST define the following variables
Hi list,
Can anybody here explain how the COMPONENT option of
the INSTALL CMake MACRO
works?
I am able to specify COMPONENT in my INSTALL command
but I don't know how to use it with unix makefile generator?
[...]
We (me and Frederik D.) did ask howto use
the COMPONENT option of the INSTALL
Quoting Alex Dantart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You need g++ to build CMake and it does not look like you have
installed it: CMake Error: your CXX compiler:
CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_FULLPATH-NOTFOUND was not found in your path. For
CMake to correctly use try compile commands, the compiler must be in
Hello,
According to http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2007-January/012713.html
test case specific timeouts should be supported via set_tests_properties in
CMake 2.4.7. Unfortunately, this does not seem to work for me. Note that I
don't want to use Dart, but just local CTest. Also, I want to
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 20:10, Alex Dantart wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Any reason you aren't using a pre-compiled binary?
where can i find a pre-compiled binary 2.4.2 for ubuntu ? I can't !
http://www.cmake.org/HTML/Download.html ??
Hello all,
I have been given a task to master CMake, apart from reading and
referring book titled Mastering CMake, how else I can start.
wiki seems to be bit complicated, any other way??? or someone has some
kind of self tutorial??
Thanks All..
___
Looks like Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win is trying the host C++ compiler
instead of the target c++ compiler for some reason.
84/ 89 Testing Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win
Test command: /home/mmalaterre/Dashboards/MyTests/CMake-gcc42/bin/ctest
--build-and-test
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Looks like Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win is trying the host C++ compiler
instead of the target c++ compiler for some reason.
84/ 89 Testing Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win
Test command: /home/mmalaterre/Dashboards/MyTests/CMake-gcc42/bin/ctest
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Looks like Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win is trying the host C++ compiler
instead of the target c++ compiler for some reason.
84/ 89 Testing Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win
Test command:
On 8/8/07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Looks like Simple_Mingw_Linux2Win is trying the host C++ compiler
instead of the target c++ compiler for some reason.
Alex Dantart wrote:
doing exacly that was exactly the reason I wrote here...
in my first email of this trhread you will see the problems doing that
sudo apt-get install build-essential
Should get make as well as g++.
--
Philip Lowman
Simulation Development Engineer, Modeling and Simulation
On 8/8/07, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Can anybody here explain how the COMPONENT option of
the INSTALL CMake MACRO
works?
I think of it as a way to give a name to different subsets of your
installable files, so that you can install the subset of choice using
make install.
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:33, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Do you have the CXX environment variable set ?
Nothing under CXX, but I do have a CXXFLAGS...
I changed Tests/CMakeLists.txt so it should work now, now the CXX compiler is
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
CMake will not be able to correctly generate this project.
The problem is here:
-Wl,--out-implib,libcmTryCompileExec.dll.a
-Wl,--major-image-version,0,--minor-image-version,0
/usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '--out-implib'
/usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for
Can someone help on where I could find the release notes for 2.4.7 ?
Cheers,
Dieter
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/8/8, gga [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm currently using cmake for a variety of projects. Love it.
However, one feature I find myself missing more and more is one from
autotools configure scripts: AC_ARG_ENABLE().
That is, the ability to allow the configuration script (ie.
On 8/8/07, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Noulard wrote:
...
--enable-foo is much more readable than -DENABLE_FOO or -DUSE_FOO.
Having implemented USE_FOO arguments for every single one of our
optional dependencies and looked at them on a CMake command line I can
attest to this.
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 10:19, Philip Lowman wrote:
Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/8/8, gga [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm currently using cmake for a variety of projects. Love it.
However, one feature I find myself missing more and more is one from
autotools configure scripts: AC_ARG_ENABLE().
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:33, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Do you have the CXX environment variable set ?
Nothing under CXX, but I do have a CXXFLAGS...
I changed
On 8/8/07, Dieter Oberkofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help on where I could find the release notes for 2.4.7 ?
I don't know of anything specifically called release notes. There's
a readme.txt at the top of the source tree, and also a ChangeLog.txt.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 8/8/07, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, note that if you want to specify *at the time you run 'make
install'* which component will be installed, you need to do a little
trick using 'cmake -P ...'.
Precisely what is the little trick?
Otherwise you can only specify the
On 8/8/07, Sunil Kumar Emmadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have been given a task to master CMake, apart from reading and
referring book titled Mastering CMake, how else I can start.
wiki seems to be bit complicated, any other way??? or someone has some
kind of self tutorial??
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 10:38, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:33, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 8/8/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Do you have the CXX environment variable set ?
On 8/8/07, gga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I can pass -D symbols to cmake to modify its behavior and that
windows also has its ugly CmakeSetup gui.
Ugly? Geez, what are you, a candidate for Windows Aero or something?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 8/8/07, Dieter Oberkofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help on where I could find the release notes for 2.4.7 ?
I don't know of anything specifically called release notes. There's
a readme.txt at the top of the source tree, and also a
On 8/8/07, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In defense of the original post,
--enable-foo is much more readable than -DENABLE_FOO or -DUSE_FOO.
No it isn't, and it's not much of a defense. Slightly more readable
I'd accept. Let's refrain from religious hyperbole when contemplating
Alex Dantart wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
where can i find a pre-compiled binary 2.4.2 for ubuntu ? I can't !
http://www.cmake.org/HTML/Download.html ??
WHERE ?!?!?!
no binnaries for ubuntu there !!
the .sh just decompress the same that tarball :P
You don't need an
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
.
.
.
Anyway, this line seems to be the important clue:
/usr/bin/ld: crt1.o No hay tal fichero: No existe el fichero รณ directorio
It looks almost like your compiler is not installed properly? Are you
In addition, if it is crt1.o which is missing, it is in glibc-devel on a
redhat 7.3 system.
Regards,
Juan
Juan Sanchez wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Alex Dantart wrote:
.
.
.
Anyway, this line seems to be the important clue:
/usr/bin/ld:
Please see:
http://felixker.com/tips-and-tricks/crt1o-no-such-file-no-such-file-or-directory/
From the article (the Fedora instructions make no sense at all):
While using gcc on a newly installed system you may get:
/usr/bin/ld: crt1.o: No such file: No such file or directory
This is a common
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 8/8/07, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love CMake, but there have been times when I wished that
--enable-foo would simply be a shortcut to set a boolean variable
ENABLE_FOO to true.
Some would say that's not nice because you don't get exactly what's on
On 08.08.07 12:46:56, Philip Lowman wrote:
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 8/8/07, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love CMake, but there have been times when I wished that
--enable-foo would simply be a shortcut to set a boolean variable
ENABLE_FOO to true.
Some would say
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 13:05, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 08.08.07 12:46:56, Philip Lowman wrote:
...
Actually, it's more like this:
cmake -D USE_FOO=BOOL:ON .
or
cmake -D USE_FOO=BOOL:OFF .
Not quite, the BOOL: is not needed.
It depends.
If you want it to go in the cache, it is
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
The fact that people don't even know the proper way to define variables
at the command line (myself included) should be proof positive that
CMake could use some improvement when operating in command line mode.
Or that people should start reading documentations ;)
I
Hi,
I have a C mixed with Fortran and would like to be able to choose my
fortran compiler depending on the c compiler eg ifort if I use icc or
f77 if I use gcc. I tried this
IF ( CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCC )
SET(CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER f77)
ENDIF ( CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCC )
But it does
On Friday 03 August 2007 20:00, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
Hello,
Why isn't there the following in cmGlobalGenerator.h :
virtual const char* GetCleanTargetName() { return 0; }
and the following in cmGlobalUnixMakefileGenerator3.h :
virtual const char*
How should a visual studio developer rebuild individual projects
within the ide? It has been mentioned on the alias that one should no
longer use the visual studio rebuild option as that also rebuilds
the cmakelists.txt.
Is the only way to rebuild source files without rebuilding
cmakelists.txt
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Thanks again,
Marie
cmake -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER:string=g77
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:string=g++ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER:string=g++
-- Check for working CXX compiler: g++
-- Check for
Try moving the quotes like this:
cmake .. -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:string=g++ ...
On 8/8/07, Marie-Christine Vallet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Thanks again,
Marie
cmake
Marie-Christine Vallet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Thanks again,
Marie
I suspect you want to look at LINKER_LANGUAGE. You really don't want to
use g++ for a c compiler.
What are you trying to do?
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:04, Marie-Christine Vallet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Yes.
This file is used for testing:
#ifndef __cplusplus
# error The CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER is set to a C compiler
#endif
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Marie-Christine Vallet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Thanks again,
Marie
I suspect you want to look at LINKER_LANGUAGE. You really don't want
to use g++ for a c compiler.
What are
On 8/8/07, Marie-Christine Vallet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake does
not let me do that. Is this normal?
Dunno. But the preferred interface nowadays is to set the LANGUAGE
and LINKER_LANGUAGE properties of a file.
On 8/8/07, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know where -DUSE_FOO or -D USE_FOO came from, it doesn't appear
to be legal in 2.4.6.
Oops. Guess I haven't done enough of these to remember how I did them.
The fact that people don't even know the proper way to define variables
at
Marie-Christine Vallet wrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Marie-Christine Vallet wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use g++ as my c compiler (which works) but cmake
does not let me do that. Is this normal?
Thanks again,
Marie
I suspect you want to look at LINKER_LANGUAGE. You really don't want
to use g++
On 2007-08-08 21:52-0400 Bill Hoffman wrote:
one of the c files includes a c++ file that is why I need to compile my c
files with g++ and not gcc. One of the solution would be to rename my c
file cpp or cxx
thanks,
Marie
You can also set the language for that .c file to CXX.
Note that many C/C++ compilers rely on the file extension to determine whether
it should be processed using C or C++.
I tested this a file with a simple function and with the following extensions
on linux 32 bit and looked at the symbols using nm.
For gcc -c
.c unmangled
.C mangled
.cc
50 matches
Mail list logo
