Hi cmake-team,
i have a question.
in my cmake file i have the following line:
SET(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER "C:/Program Files/Microsoft/ Visual Studio
8/VC/ce/bin/x86_arm/cl.exe")
When i apply nmake afterwards i get this error:
Der Befehl "C:\Program" ist entweder falsch geschrieben oder
konnte nicht g
What does the following error message mean:
"Re-run cmake no build system arguments"
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Quick question if I may.
I can add a configuration by using following the instructions here:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_can_I_extend_the_build_modes_wit
h_a_custom_made_one_.3F
How do I go about removing an existing one?
Joe
___
CMake
Hi List,
I have written a macro in order to use it as a new command in cmake.
This macro looks like this;
MACRO(C2ADA _file _option)
IF(C2ADA_PARSER)
SET(INC_DIRS -I;-I)
GET_FILENAME_COMPONENT(_name ${_file} NAME)
GET_FILENAME_COMPONENT(_basename ${_file}
>> From: Alan W. Irwin (on cmake list)
> > Yes, [svnversion] is the whole point! It is much easier
> than using individual
> > revision nubmers for each file.
>
> Although not nearly as informative. I just tried svnversion,
> and it only
> gives a range of Revision numbers for the source tre
I’m confused (not for the first time! ☺).
Why is it that cmGlobalVisualStudio7Generator only supports DEBUG, RELEASE,
MINSIZEREL and RELWITHDEBINFO? They’re mostly placeholders anyway so it seems
wierd that they are hardcoded and enforced.
Is this a bug or a feature, does anyone know? If I r
Is this a bug or a feature, does anyone know? If I rip out the checks in
cmGlobalVisualStudio7Generator:: GenerateConfigurations is anything going to
break?
If you rip out this I think you'll have an error with TRY_COMPILE. (be
aware to delete your CMakeLists.txt cache each time you test
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Josef Karthauser
> Sent: 05 October 2007 15:44
> To: cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: [CMake] Supported configurations with Visual Studio builds
>
> I’m confused (not for the first time! ☺).
>
> Why is it
If you rip out this I think you'll have an error with TRY_COMPILE. (be
aware to delete your CMakeLists.txt cache each time you test your
changes to be sure that the TRY_COMPILE is able to work correctly).
I meant CMakeCache.txt not CMakeLists.txt, sorry.
--Sylvain
>
> > Is this a bug or a feature, does anyone know? If I rip out the
> checks in cmGlobalVisualStudio7Generator:: GenerateConfigurations is
> anything going to break?
> >
> >
> If you rip out this I think you'll have an error with TRY_COMPILE. (be
> aware to delete your CMakeLists.txt cache each
As Alan points out, you shouldn't trust the output of "svn info" as
gospel unless you also verify that "svn status" gives you *empty*
output.
In the case that Alan identifies of trying to track down where a bug
was introduced, a quick svn status check would show you which files
were *not* up to da
On 2007-10-05 14:28+0100 Atwood, Robert C wrote:
>> From: Alan W. Irwin (on cmake list)
Yes, [svnversion] is the whole point! It is much easier
than using individual
revision nubmers for each file.
Although not nearly as informative. I just tried svnversion,
and it only
gives a range of
I hope its okay to copy this to Subversion list, as it has veered away
from cmake ...
Alan said (on Cmake list):
> take a concrete but simple example, suppose you have five
> files which all
> have 3 possibilities (1,2,3) for the revision number. IOW,
> each file changed
> for each revision. T
How about "svn status -u" or a filtered version of "svn status -v" ?
On 10/5/07, Atwood, Robert C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope its okay to copy this to Subversion list, as it has veered away
> from cmake ...
>
> Alan said (on Cmake list):
>
> > take a concrete but simple example, suppo
> I can add a configuration by using following the instructions here:
>
>
>
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_can_I_extend_the_build_modes_wit
h_a_custom_made_one_.3F
>
> How do I go about removing an existing one?
Answering my own question, I now see I don't need to. Instead I just
defi
How about:
svn info file:///home/juans/svn_repository/svnroot/ | grep '^Revision:'
| sed -e 's/^[^0-9]*//'
on the repository.
Or just:
svn info | grep '^Revision:' | sed -e 's/^[^0-9]*//'
After doing a svn update, the latest revision on the url seems to be
accurate. Unfortunately the number
Hi:
> How about:
>
> svn info file:///home/juans/svn_repository/svnroot/ | grep
> '^Revision:'
> | sed -e 's/^[^0-9]*//'
I don't really like the idea of too much shell-filtering for this (or
similar) purpose. The necessity of such indicates either there's a
feature that people want, that's la
Ok,
My code was for demonstration purposes only. Of course there are more
generic ways to process the information, perhaps even using CMake itself.
A google search reveals that the last line from "svn status -q " is
often used to get the latest revision number.
In the search for knowledge, it i
I'm having trouble running cygwin cmake 2.4.7-2 on two different
machines, one running XP, and one Windows 2000. Here's the error:
% /bin/cmake
CMake Error: Could not find CMAKE_ROOT !!!
CMake has most likely not been installed correctly.
Modules directory not found in
/bin
39 [main] cmake
Looks to me like the output of "svn status -u" will give you something like...
Status against revision: 1234
... when everything is up to date with respect to "svn info".
And it will give something like...
*1001 FileAtPrevRevision.cxx
Status against revision: 1234
... when there is
Not being a member of the subversion list. And doubting that non cmake
members can email this list. Please email us the results of your query
to the subversion list.
Juan
David Cole wrote:
> Looks to me like the output of "svn status -u" will give you something like...
> Status against revision
Hi:
I think I've got it (the CMAKE bit, for whichever svn command is
eventually used) nearly ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 October 2007 18:07
> If that is more information than you want in your executables, then to
> answer your ori
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Sanchez
> Not being a member of the subversion list. And doubting that
> non cmake
> members can email this list. Please email us the results of
> your query
Okay, if people don't think it irrelevant to Cmake. I'm sensitive to the
fact this discussi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi cmake-team,
> i have a question.
> in my cmake file i have the following line:
> SET(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER "C:/Program Files/Microsoft/ Visual Studio
> 8/VC/ce/bin/x86_arm/cl.exe")
>
> When i apply nmake afterwards i get this error:
> Der Befehl "C:\Program" ist entweder
I'm compiling under Linux and it seems like cmake is automatically
adding -rdynamic to my build.
This switch is okay for debug builds and open source tools, but for
closed source it is a big problem.
This switch is unfortunately exposing some unwanted functions in my
code, like the licensing fun
25 matches
Mail list logo