Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009, Martin Apel wrote:
>
>> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Martin Apel wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
I am currently fighting with Visual Studio regenerating a
CMake-generated project on every bu
My interpretation of the question was the simplest thing to think of,
which is just to provide a list of symbols that you want defined in a
target, as in:
set_target_properties(MyDll PROPERTIES
COMPILE_DEFINITIONS _USRDLL,UNICODE)
It appears to be as simple as separating the symbols with
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Martin Apel wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Martin Apel wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am currently fighting with Visual Studio regenerating a
> >> CMake-generated project on every build, although nothing has changed. I
> >> am searchin
If in my CMakeLists.txt file I have:
PROJECT(CMakeDemo)
set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE DEBUG)
ADD_EXECUTABLE(CMakeDemo cmakedemo.cpp)
when I run ccmake on the directory and press 'c' to configure, the
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE field is still empty. Have I not set it properly? Or do you
have to turn on "show default
What does IMPLICIT_DEPENDS in add_custom_command actually do?
Why is it only available to Makefile generators?
Thanks,
James
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, James Bigler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Nikolay Mitev wrote:
>
>> [posting to the list, since I accidentally replied only to Sergey]
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Sergey Rudchenko <
>> sergey.rudche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-04-
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Nikolay Mitev wrote:
> [posting to the list, since I accidentally replied only to Sergey]
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Sergey Rudchenko <
> sergey.rudche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:37 +0300, Nikolay Mitev wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I ha
brice rebsamen schrieb:
How to know the version of an installed library? My code has #if
macros to handle different APIs. So I would need to get the version
and set 2 variables (MAJOR and MINOR) and pass them to the compiler (-D).
To be more precise, I am interested in Player/Stage. One way to
Zitat von alexandre.feb...@thomsonreuters.com:
Using target_link_libraries(), I set that:
- exe depends on lib1
- lib1 depends on lib2, lib3
- lib2 depends on lib3
- lib3 depends on lib2
And the generated link line is : lib1 lib2 lib3 lib1 lib2 lib3.
Of cours
Eric,
in fact we build static libraries.
And we currently use a custom build system with a "handmade" link line.
Alexandre
-Original Message-
From: Eric Noulard [mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:04
To: Feblot, Alexandre (M Risk)
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject
2009/4/23 :
> I have some code with multiple circular dependencies. I rely on the
> transitive dependency mechanism to create the link line. Following is a
> short example of libs which can't be resolved properly.
>
> รจ My question is: if there a way to help cmake create a working link line.
>
[..
Hi,
I have some code with multiple circular dependencies. I rely on the
transitive dependency mechanism to create the link line. Following is a
short example of libs which can't be resolved properly.
==> My question is: if there a way to help cmake create a working link
line.
In the exampl
[posting to the list, since I accidentally replied only to Sergey]
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Sergey Rudchenko <
sergey.rudche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:37 +0300, Nikolay Mitev wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have the following situation:
> >
> > files: test.cpp test.h
> >
> >
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:37 +0300, Nikolay Mitev wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have the following situation:
>
> files: test.cpp test.h
>
> I want to process the file test.cpp with a custom pre-processor which
> will generate, say, test.ii.cpp which will get compiled into
> libtest.a. test.cpp just includes
Hi
I have the following situation:
files: test.cpp test.h
I want to process the file test.cpp with a custom pre-processor which will
generate, say, test.ii.cpp which will get compiled into libtest.a. test.cpp
just includes test.h.
This is my CMakeLists.txt file:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Martin Apel wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am currently fighting with Visual Studio regenerating a
>> CMake-generated project on every build, although nothing has changed. I
>> am searching for a method how to debug the generated dependencies
16 matches
Mail list logo