[cmake-developers] [CMake 0011819]: VS 2010 fails when PROJECT_LABEL contains :

2011-02-08 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11819 == Reported By:Ryan Pavlik Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] CPack RPM in next RC (if there is one)?

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/2/8 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com: On 02/06/2011 03:58 PM, Eric Noulard wrote: if there is one RC left before 2.8.4 it would be nice to include this patchset. Does this fix a regression from a previous release? No this is not a regression fix. Just a wish to have ArchiveGenerator at

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
While I too find myself sometimes wanting convenience scripts - some people find the use of '-DENABLE_whatever=ON' instead of --enable-whatever' foreign, for example - the problem with them, IMO, is that they're impossible to make crossplatform without requiring the presence of some tool - perl,

Re: [CMake] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX on Windows Machine

2011-02-08 Thread Holmes, David R. III, Ph.D. [RO RM1-24]
Andreas- Thank you for educating me. I really need to spend more time with CMake to understand these issues. david David R Holmes III Biomedical Imaging Resource Core Facility Director Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering

Re: [CMake] get_target_property( LOCATION) and CMAKE_DEBUG_POSTFIX (aka: Installing PDB files)

2011-02-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.de wrote:   Is there another API to retrieve the path to a dll file generated by cmake from its target name ? Have you already tried the LOCATION_CONFIG target property?                                   ^ Fantastic !

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/2/8 Martin O'Brien martin.matthew.obr...@gmail.com: While I too find myself sometimes wanting convenience scripts - some people find the use of '-DENABLE_whatever=ON' instead of --enable-whatever' foreign, for example - the problem with them, IMO, is that they're impossible to make

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
Absolutely, and that is what I do in some cases, but in the particular case that I described - which is what I had in mind; I should have been clearer - it doesn't help, as it's still -D... syntax. mm -Original Message- From: Eric Noulard [mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Michael Wild
And there's the hidden trap that the -D options must be *before* the -P option. Very nasty, especially for people who never used CMake before. Michael On 02/08/2011 09:27 AM, Martin O'Brien wrote: Absolutely, and that is what I do in some cases, but in the particular case that I described -

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
Indeed. There's also just typing -DENABLE-something instead of -DENABLE-something=ON due to being used to --enable-something. I find myself committing unintentionally all the time, and I've used CMake for a fairly long time. CMake of course flags it, but it's discouraging (IMO) to new users.

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/2/8 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: And there's the hidden trap that the -D options must be *before* the -P option. Very nasty, especially for people who never used CMake before. Yes right I was caught by that in the past. On 02/08/2011 09:27 AM, Martin O'Brien wrote: Absolutely, and

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
I've resisted the urge to patch, since I really don't want to be dependent on a custom version of CMake. As far as how many people would like it, I don't know, but my guess would be that most who were more familiar with configure or really anything that Getopt long-ish than CMake would probably

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/2/8 Martin O'Brien martin.matthew.obr...@gmail.com: I've resisted the urge to patch, since I really don't want to be dependent on a custom version of CMake. My idea was more like proposing a feature request + patch in order to make the feature go in upstream CMake. I cannot ensure it will

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
I understand, but that's still a custom version for my purposes, at least for the time being. I definitely can't rely on the people who are complaining about having to do the -D... to have the correct version installed, or even to recognize when they don't, probably, and if I give them this

Re: [CMake] add_subdirectory and eclipse project

2011-02-08 Thread Andrea Galeazzi
Il 18/01/2011 19.17, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto: On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Andrea Galeazzi wrote: ... I just read that wiki page but what I didn't find is how can I see the sources referenced by the add_subproject function in the layout of eclipse project. You mean add_subdirectory(),

[CMake] Manifest issues and CMakeVerifyManifest

2011-02-08 Thread Olivier Pierard
Dear all, When developing on Windows, I think everything works fine and it be definitely packaged when ...BOUM... someone reports a configuration which fails to start the program ! So, some questions: 1°) I started to try the CMakeVerifyManifest which detects effectively some errors. Manifest

Re: [CMake] Manifest issues and CMakeVerifyManifest

2011-02-08 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 2/8/2011 9:01 AM, Olivier Pierard wrote: Dear all, When developing on Windows, I think everything works fine and it be definitely packaged when ...BOUM... someone reports a configuration which fails to start the program ! So, some questions: 1°) I started to try the CMakeVerifyManifest

[CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
All, I am trying to generate binary zip of my project using CPack 3.8.3 and looks like now it generates two zip files where each file has the name of the group. Did anyone noticed this change ? How do I revert it back to the old behavior all groups in the same binary zip file ? Thanks, --

Re: [CMake] Automatic out of source build's possible?

2011-02-08 Thread Tyler Roscoe
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 04:56:26AM -0500, Martin O'Brien wrote: I definitely can't rely on the people who are complaining about having to do the -D... to have the correct version installed, or even to recognize when they don't, probably, and if I give them this option, they're going to write

Re: [CMake] add_subdirectory and eclipse project

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 08 February 2011, Andrea Galeazzi wrote: Il 18/01/2011 19.17, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto: On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Andrea Galeazzi wrote: ... I just read that wiki page but what I didn't find is how can I see the sources referenced by the add_subproject function in the

Re: [CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Answering myself: set(CPACK_MONOLITHIC_INSTALL 1) 2cts On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: All,  I am trying to generate binary zip of my project using CPack 3.8.3 and looks like now it generates two zip files where each file has the name of

Re: [CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Eric, Thanks a bunch for your tremendous work ! Quick question would this means that the warning will also go away: CPack warning: both CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL and CPACK_MONOLITHIC_INSTALL have been set. AFAIK CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL is required to be set to list all different components,

Re: [CMake] WG: Problems with MinGW + BundleUtilities

2011-02-08 Thread David Cole
Copy the file C:/Program Files (x86)/CMake 2.8/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/BundleUtilities.cmake and in your own copy replace all: message(STATUS with: message( Then reference that copied file directly from your install/CMakeLists.txt and run it again. -- i.e. -- instead of

Re: [CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Clinton Stimpson
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:29:31 am Eric Noulard wrote: 2011/2/8 Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com: Hi Eric, Thanks a bunch for your tremendous work ! You're welcome, feedback of this feature is welcomed. Quick question would this means that the warning will also

Re: [CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Clinton Stimpson
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 12:10:36 pm Clinton Stimpson wrote: On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:29:31 am Eric Noulard wrote: 2011/2/8 Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com: Hi Eric, Thanks a bunch for your tremendous work ! You're welcome, feedback of this feature is

Re: [CMake] CPack: CPACK_COMPONENT_GROUP in cmake 2.8.3 / Windows binary zip

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/2/8 Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com: I also saw that warning with this example (there's nothing in this example about a MONOLITHIC install): cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) project(hello) install(CODE message(installing...) COMPONENT Hello) set(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL Hello)

Re: [CMake] Cross-compiling a static library (CMake 2.8.3)

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 07 February 2011, Emmanuel Blot wrote: FWIW: I found why I use CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER rather than the simpler CMAKE_C_COMPILER command: I build projects for eCos from outside the eCos tree directory, and CMake has some trouble finding the eCos header files when simply using

[CMake] OS X Application plist configuration questions

2011-02-08 Thread Michael Jackson
At what point is the MacOSXBundleInfo.plist.in configured? I am setting all the relevant variables but they are not getting inserted into the plist. Here is some debug output from a CMake run of my project: -- MACOSX_BUNDLE_INFO_STRING: StatsGenerator_debug Version 2011.02.08, Copyright 2009

Re: [CMake] Question about dependencies

2011-02-08 Thread Martin O'Brien
You have a number of typos there - are you sure that's not the problem? CMAKE_BINAARY_DIR Factfile v. Facfile FACTILE v. FACTFILE Mm On Feb 8, 2011 6:48 PM, Carminati Federico federico.carmin...@cern.ch wrote: Hello, May be this is a very simple question but... I have a fully qualified path

Re: [CMake] Question about dependencies

2011-02-08 Thread Carminati Federico
Martin, sorry for the stupid misspelling. The problem is real, only the message is misspelled. Best, Federico Carminati CERN-PH 1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland Tel: +41 22 76 74959 Fax: +41 22 76 68505 Mobile: +41 76 487 4843 On 9 Feb 2011, at 01:50, Martin O'Brien wrote: You have a number

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.3-1586-gbc1ea40

2011-02-08 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via bc1ea40b12a13898e091ada1ac281cfe8dd09ba6 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.3-704-g5b8869f

2011-02-08 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via 5b8869faea87187743b7a1578f29b5c3223fee19 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.3-709-gd5fceb4

2011-02-08 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via d5fceb4f07108071f4899e2b1bdfb945615e84e2 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.3-1592-gbf38b1f

2011-02-08 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via bf38b1f123df150d08dd8328d163d9cefbbca8d4 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.3-710-g7258b06

2011-02-08 Thread KWSys Robot
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via 7258b0674cf64292751dcd36d734688031fffa4c (commit) from