I was just replying to an acquaintance who was e-mailing me about CMake
configuration when I realized that CMake configuration options
which are only available depending on how other configuration
options are set could be analyzed/displayed using graph theory
(from a 5-minute study of graph theory
On 9/1/2011 12:27 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
It would make a mess if you created a sub-dir per test. There would be lots
and lots of sub-dirs in some projects.
Personally I would expect that, and be OK with it, as long as the
directory name
Hi David,
I've updated the bug with a patch which adds a test to check that defining
_SBCS does set CharacterSet to 0 (Single Byte Character Set). I checked that
it works when _SBCS is set and fails when _SBCS is not defined.
I looked for where the _UNICODE option is documented, thinking to do
That was intentional. .dll Should already be in CMAKE_FIND_LIBRARY_SUFFIXES on
WIN32.
Since your commits haven't hit git/gitweb yet I'm not sure what you didn't
commit.
As far as the ACML changes go, the file globbing is way too greedy, and breaks
if more than one ACML or ACML-GPU package is i
On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Alexey Ozeritsky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:47 PM, don la dieu wrote:
>> That was intentional. .dll Should already be in CMAKE_FIND_LIBRARY_SUFFIXES
>> on WIN32.
>
> Yes, it should already be in CMAKE_FIND_LIBRARY_SUFFIXES but not in
> CMAKE_FIND_LIBRRAY_SUF
Sounds like a great research project for somebody. Would be cool to
see CMake options visualized for some larger projects...
Not sure of its feasibility in terms of completeness, however. I'm
sure you could come up with something rudimentary that seems to work
for some cases.
There are some cases
On 2011-09-01 18:00-0400 David Cole wrote:
Sounds like a great research project for somebody. Would be cool to
see CMake options visualized for some larger projects...
Not sure of its feasibility in terms of completeness, however. I'm
sure you could come up with something rudimentary that seems
On 9/1/2011 8:48 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Yeah, it is fun to speculate about something new like this that would
be of considerable benefit to help a project's developers and users
visualize the complete set of options and their dependencies for their
project's build system. Unfortunately I don't
