FWIW, BRL-CAD has its own FindTCL.cmake module which is quite different
from the current one, in case that is helpful/of interest:
http://brlcad.svn.sf.net/viewvc/brlcad/brlcad/trunk/misc/CMake/FindTCL.cmake?revision=45989&view=markup
We'd eventually like to fold all of our updates to various mod
Hi Alex:
On 2011-11-15 18:07+0100 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
cmake ships with a FindPkgConfig.cmake file, which is used by some Find-
modules.
Also in KDE, we have quite a lot of Find-modules which use
FindPkgConfig.cmake.
Now, some of them put a
if(UNIX)
find_package(PkgConfig)
endif()
I have a couple issues, that I'd like to help fix, with the current
FindTCL.cmake, FindTclsh.cmake, FindWish.cmake, and FindTclStub.cmake that
make them unusable for me. The first is they do not always find the
various components from the same Tcl installation on the system. The
second being that
Looks like OpenCV is not built or installed correctly here.
The string "@CMAKE_LIB_DIRS_CONFIGCMAKE@" should have been resolved
into a "list of directories" value when the OpenCVConfig.cmake file
was created.
How did you build/install OpenCV?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Javi Soler wrote:
Hello!
I'm just adding the libraries (openCV and PCL) to my project:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
project(grabbing)
find_package(OpenCV REQUIRED)
find_package(PCL 1.3.0)
include_directories(${PCL_INCLUDE_DIRS})
link_directories(${PCL_LIBRARY_DIRS})
add_definitions(${PCL_DEFINITIONS})
add_exe
2011/11/16 Mauricio Klein :
> Hello guys!
> I have researched a lot about it but can't find a solution.
> I have a project under SVN control and using CMake to compile the whole
> code. But, when i run "make clean", the CMake clean its temporary
> directories and the .svn directories too, what caus
On 11/16/2011 06:05 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 4:43 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
>> On 11/15/2011 06:04 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>> On 11/15/2011 11:52 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
>>>
Could you boild down this issue to a minimal and self-sufficient example
- i.e. a project wor
On 2011-11-15 23:35-0500 Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 11/14/2011 3:24 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
If you are willing to make such an OCaml summary, I would be willing
to do the same thing for Ada to make our joint case to the CMake
developers of what kind of additional generic language support is
need
Hello guys!
I have researched a lot about it but can't find a solution.
I have a project under SVN control and using CMake to compile the whole
code. But, when i run "make clean", the CMake clean its temporary
directories and the .svn directories too, what cause many troubles when
commiting the c
On 16.11.11 17:35:22, Marcus Monaghan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just starting to use the cpack module in cmake to put together TGZ.
>
> I use TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES to specify which libs to use during linking.
>
> Is there a way to get a list of the libs that are found and include them in
> my TGZ?
>
Overall, it will be challenging. We prefer adding tests of all new
features, and it's difficult to add a test that runs on a sufficient
number of dashboard clients (greater than zero... :-) when the thing
you're testing depends on having / simulating a commercial tool
installed on the machine.
But
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Alexander Neundorf
>
> wrote:
> >> I suspect that the only way to make source code control
> >> plugins happy is to link to dummy projects like you
> >> do for the main source directory.
> >> And then there's no ne
Thanks for the info David.
If I can find the time I would love to help make these changes for you. In
the meantime if you find the time, give me some pointers to get me started
and I'll work on this for you (class names, interface methods that are
important to implement, etc)
-
Robert Dai
Just looking at the calendar...
Three short weeks from today, we are planning to schedule the build
and upload of CMake 2.8.7-rc1 so all of you can give it a try.
Followed by weekly rc's as needed until the final official release of
CMake 2.8.7, scheduled for Wednesday Dec. 28, 2011.
If you are a
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
>> I suspect that the only way to make source code control
>> plugins happy is to link to dummy projects like you
>> do for the main source directory.
>> And then there's no need for those individual source file links.
>
> AFAIK svn etc. w
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> So basically because we use perforce, there is no way to use ctest?
Well, you can still use ctest, you just won't be able to use the
ctest_update function in your script to do the update, track the
changed files, and communicate them up to
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Tried it. It seems to get the linking right, though I'm not
> > sure how excited my users are going to be about how
> > deeply buried those source files are in the GUI. There's
> > a whole lot
Hi,
I'm just starting to use the cpack module in cmake to put together TGZ.
I use TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES to specify which libs to use during linking.
Is there a way to get a list of the libs that are found and include them in my
TGZ?
I can include the libs that are compiled as part of my build,
I've actually used that workaround, but it seems dirty as it shows up in
IDE targets like Visual Studio or other IDEs or makefiles. In fact, I
kind of like the 'generating /docs' part of the makefile.
Would it just be smarter to rename the target to 'documentation'?
--
Powered by www.kitwa
This is not a new issue, as you can see in this thread:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-March/035889.html
Very frustrating. I think in the end I removed the system installation.
May not be an option for everyone.
On 11/16/2011 10:32 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Hi,
Using the 'release' b
So basically because we use perforce, there is no way to use ctest?
I assume ctest does the following:
- Check out source code
- Configure CMake
- Generate CMake
- Initiate a build from generated targets
Is this correct? If so, it's the first step that code needs to be added for
to support perfor
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:46 AM, David Cole wrote:
> If you end the name in a ".", or set the suffix to ".", does it
> produce a file like you want? Or does it still append "dll"?
>
That's a good idea - if I set the project name to 'something.' I do
get the right output (the static export library
On 11/16/2011 4:43 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 11/15/2011 06:04 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 11/15/2011 11:52 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
Could you boild down this issue to a minimal and self-sufficient example
- i.e. a project working with 2.6 (quite old) but failing with 2.8 - and
post it h
And, to answer your initial question, no, perforce is not yet an
officially supported version control system for use with ctest -S
scripts and CDash.
The ones that are include:
git
svn
cvs
hg
bzr
Additional code needs to be added to both ctest and CDash in order to
support new version c
On 11/16/2011 3:52 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 11/16/2011 04:13 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of se
CDash is just a web app / server app. It does not do builds, it just
collects information from clients that submit to it, and displays
results.
Client machines can run ctest -S scripts to submit build/test results
to a CDash dashboard.
Look at the notes attached to a typical CMake dashboard for a
Seems like the web viewer link is optional, I created the project without
it.
However, I see the default build groups but how do I add a build? I suppose
CDash needs to know how to do a checkout of source code from Perforce? I'm
really confused on what to do next...
-
Robert Dailey
On W
I am using CMAKE_DEBUG_POSTFIX to attach a string to end of each DLL
name being built using Visual Studio 2008. The DLLs have the name that
expect which is the target name + CMAKE_DEBUG_POSTFIX. The problem I
am running into is the SWIG wrapper DLL name does not match the
dllimport flag when buildi
Is it possible to use CDash with perforce as our SCM?
During the CDash installation, it is asking me for a "Repository
ViewerURL", and from the drop down it doesn't show perforce as a valid item
in the list. Can this step be skipped or is there some way to make perforce
work with this? I believe p
Hi,
Using the 'release' branch of CMake, it seems that FindBoost.cmake got
broken such that when BOOST_ROOT is set, the system copy of boost is
still found, effectively ignoring whatever BOOST_ROOT sets. This doesn't
work at all for projects where a newer boost than the system version is
needed.
> if(EXISTS ${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/Foo.cmake)
> include(${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/Foo.cmake)
> else()
> ...
> endif()
If I have 2.8.2 installed on the host, but my software has 2.8.6
module imported, the version 2.8.2 will be selected. Therefore, it
will "break". I think it needs more restricted check
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Stephen Torri wrote:
> On 11/4/11, Michael Hertling wrote:
>>
>> The problem is that PDB files are usually generated next to their binary
>> in a configuration-specific directory which can not be accessed smoothly
>> by INSTALL(FILES ...). However, you can use a P
Alex recently also asked something to this effect on the list...
IMHO it would be best to copy the module verbatim and then in the copy
do something like this at the very top:
if(EXISTS ${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/Foo.cmake)
include(${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/Foo.cmake)
else()
...
endif()
Either put the
On 11/4/11, Michael Hertling wrote:
>
> The problem is that PDB files are usually generated next to their binary
> in a configuration-specific directory which can not be accessed smoothly
> by INSTALL(FILES ...). However, you can use a POST_BUILD custom command
> in conjunction with generator expr
On 11/16/2011 02:11 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some questions regarding the use of CPack and CMake.
>
> What I'd like to do is have the a target execute multiple cpack
> configurations (additionally, have a possibility to execute only one
> configuration).
> The cpack con
Hi all,
I have some questions regarding the use of CPack and CMake.
What I'd like to do is have the a target execute multiple cpack
configurations (additionally, have a possibility to execute only one
configuration).
The cpack config can use a component to do filtering on the artifacts
needed for
The soprano author seems to keep a local copy of that macro:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/soprano/repository/revisions/master/entry/cmake/modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake
It is probably outdated since "vimdiff
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cm
If you end the name in a ".", or set the suffix to ".", does it
produce a file like you want? Or does it still append "dll"?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:06 AM, J Decker wrote:
> (Visual studio bug actually - as I was trying to find the actual
> difference in the output, and finding none, I have to
On 11/15/2011 06:04 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 11:52 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
>
>> Could you boild down this issue to a minimal and self-sufficient example
>> - i.e. a project working with 2.6 (quite old) but failing with 2.8 - and
>> post it here for further investigation?
>>
> Th
On 11/15/2011 06:26 PM, david_bjorn...@agilent.com wrote:
> The issue has been resolved
>
>
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12575
>
>
> ++David->Bjornbak;
OK, thanks for the hint.
Regards,
Michael
PS: Please drop the ML a line if there's an outside progress in a
topic you initia
On 11/16/2011 09:35 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> What version of CMake are you using? The extended signature of
>> find_package_handle_standard_args() you use in FindRaptor.cmake became
>> only available in CMake 2.8.4.
>
> Sadly 2.8.2 is the available version:
> http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/pool/h
On 11/16/2011 04:13 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
>>> 2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
>> That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
>> is one of several general limitations with CMake
Hi,
is there a way to clear the CDash Log for a specific build/project?
My problem is that i already have fixed the problem ("Got a packet bigger than
'max_allowed_packet' bytes") and now I want to remove these logs. (The orange
triangle)
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
NoRulez
--
Powered by
> What version of CMake are you using? The extended signature of
> find_package_handle_standard_args() you use in FindRaptor.cmake became
> only available in CMake 2.8.4.
Sadly 2.8.2 is the available version:
http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/pool/harmattan-beta3/free/c/cmake/
I was claiming a lot i
On 11/16/2011 09:13 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I mentioned this in my first email:
>
> I think this is a bit closer to the issue:
> -- [TEST-BEGIN] - FIND_PACKAGE RAPTOR2.0.4
> -- VERSION_VAR (missing: REQUIRED_VARS)
> -- [TEST-END] - FIND_PACKAGE RAPTOR2.0.4
>
> for this debugging lines in the C
I mentioned this in my first email:
I think this is a bit closer to the issue:
-- [TEST-BEGIN] - FIND_PACKAGE RAPTOR2.0.4
-- VERSION_VAR (missing: REQUIRED_VARS)
-- [TEST-END] - FIND_PACKAGE RAPTOR2.0.4
for this debugging lines in the CMakeLists.txt file:
message(STATUS "[TEST-BEGIN] - FIND_PA
On 16.11.11 09:46:08, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> -- RAPTOR_LIBRARIES: /usr/lib/libraptor2.so
> -- RAPTOR_INCLUDE_DIR: /usr/include/raptor2
Ok, and since you didn't post that yet, what the exact error message
from cmake that you get and where is it generated?
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Vis
47 matches
Mail list logo
