Hello,
according to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=5195 it's normal that
PREFIX and SUFFIX are write-only.
However it might be interesting/useful to have such variables so that code
like this
if(BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
set(lib_prefix ${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PREFIX)
else(BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
se
Hi,
I've been following the guide
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_RPATH_handlingfor using my libraries
with my executable on Unix, but even with any
combination of them doesn't change the final result:
anexe: error while loading shared libraries: libaname.so.1: cannot open
shared object file: No s
>
>
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:06:57 -0400
> From: Matthew Woehlke
> Subject: Re: [CMake] Cross-platform build under Windows targeting
> Linux
> To: cmake@cmake.org
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 2013-06-10 04:52, setareh S wrote:
> > Now,
Dear CMake users,
what version of CMake binary distribution file from the CMake download page
should I use to install CMake on a Linux x86-64 platfrom machine? I don't
see any binary distribution for x86-64 there.
Thank you.
Setareh
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
Most linux distros will provide a cmake package. I don't know which
platform you're using, but on opensuse, for instance, you only need to type
sudo zypper install cmake
on ubuntu, it would be ( I think)
sudo apt-get install cmake
and so on.
a
2013/6/11 setareh S
> Dear CMake users,
>
> w
Thanks Alain.
I checked my system and I get something like: GNU/Linux (Kernel: Linux,
Kernel release: 2.6.32.12-0.7)on a x84-64 machine with GNOME gnome-panel
2.28.0 desktop.
Any ideas?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Alain Leblanc wrote:
> Most linux distros will provide a cmake package. I d
Which distribution? Probably one of opensuse, fedora, ubuntu, mint, arch,
...
On some systems typing
cat /proc/version
or
uname -a
will give you this information
2013/6/11 setareh S
> Thanks Alain.
>
> I checked my system and I get something like: GNU/Linux (Kernel: Linux,
> Kernel release
hi,
what i did very often was to extract the "Linux i386" binary distribution
on a x86-64 platfrom and i never had problems with it.
good luck,
radovan
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Alain Leblanc wrote:
> Which distribution? Probably one of opensuse, fedora, ubuntu, mint, arch,
> ...
>
> O
; should I use to install CMake on a Linux x86-64 platfrom machine? I don't
> see any binary distribution for x86-64 there.
>
> Thank you.
> Setareh
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cma
-4qfmmen0hg2y0tvc9d6t...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Dear CMake users,
>>
>> what version of CMake binary distribution file from the CMake download
>> page
>> should I use to install CMake on a Linu
So this question is not 100% about cmake, but I am going to ask anyway.
What is a good project layout (for a CMake project) that will let me:
a) group related components
b) allow testing and building of individual components
c) without causing maintenance/debugging headaches, and having to update
2013/6/10 Robert Dailey
> One thing I have setup on my CMake script framework on Windows is an
> alias system. During configure, I tell CMake where my package
> repository root is on a windows share. Inside of this repository,
> third party libraries are listed in a consistent structure. I have a
No, it's not necessary, and you don't have to list them. In fact, I didn't
know you *can* list them.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.
13 matches
Mail list logo
