_VERSION_MINOR 6)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160601)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160602)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=16134
==
Reported By:Daniel Levin
Assigned To:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via ddd74ff94ba85c04382f33e01915350d65464682 (commit)
via
Hi cmake users, Reposting question from stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37449511/cmake-searching-for-shared-libraries-in-invalid-paths)
since I didn't get a good answer there:
I noticed that the cmake generation step in my project was taking a long time
and so I ran cmake
Vladimir Chebotarev writes:
> Hi there.
>
> At the moment one can add a command executing after a build of a target
> using:
> add_custom_command(... POST_BUILD...)
>
> However if the command have a dependencies which build after the target,
> there is practically
Hi Brad,
done - I had to squash and force push once more, because I used the
wrong author in the first commit.
Everything is now in one commit here:
https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e95b62110715c06fb76b57fdfb13ea493a94c0c4
Thanks for the timely feedback!
Cheers,
On 06/01/2016 02:15 PM, Matthäus G. Chajdas wrote:
> Hopefully done
The revised history looks good. The change itself looks good.
Please also add a `Help/release/dev/FindOpenCL-imported-target.rst`
file with a release note for the feature. Look at other files
in that directory for a sample.
Hopefully done - I'm not the biggest git expert but the history looks
like I'd expect it to look like :)
Cheers,
Matthäus
Am 01.06.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Brad King:
> On 06/01/2016 01:53 PM, Matthäus G. Chajdas wrote:
>> updated to latest master and pushed again (I merged latest master into
>>
On 05/30/2016 10:50 AM, BUNEL Nicolas wrote:
> Here, the new patch
Thanks.
I've applied the patches, squashed, and made some minor tweaks.
It has been merged to 'next' for testing:
Add option to control 'bin' directory of CMake's own installation (#16076)
I tried it out just now.
I pulled and installed a couple 5.x packages from the Arch archive:
https://archive.archlinux.org/packages/l/
The packages:
gcc-libs-multilib-5.3.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
gcc-multilib-5.3.0-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
lib32-gcc-libs-5.3.0-4-x86_64.p
The downgrade didn't change
On 06/01/2016 01:53 PM, Matthäus G. Chajdas wrote:
> updated to latest master and pushed again (I merged latest master into
> this - is that fine or does it have to be a rebase? In that case I'll redo.)
Please rebase and force push.
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep
Hi Brad,
updated to latest master and pushed again (I merged latest master into
this - is that fine or does it have to be a rebase? In that case I'll redo.)
Cheers,
Matthäus
Am 01.06.2016 um 17:18 schrieb Brad King:
> On 05/31/2016 03:17 PM, Matthäus G. Chajdas wrote:
>> I've just pushed
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 9f6fe2f9ba059566b665466fdcb2b0caf6d8e4fc (commit)
via
Or just isolate it into its own CMakeLists.txt file in a sub-directory?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Nicholas Braden
wrote:
> Have you tried unsetting it after adding the executable in question?
> If that doesn't work, is it possible to make the MFX executable be
Hi Folks,
I'm linking a target against libraries from an imported package. The
resulting linker invocation then will link against the libs using the full
path, but it will not set the RPATH accordingly. How to I enable RPATH?
I suspect the reason is, that, in the package's Exports.cmake, it sets
Interesting. It seems CMake is having trouble identifying GCC in 6.1.1.
Do you have a 5.x compiler available? If so does it work with that? That
would help narrow it down to a gcc6 issue vs something about how Manjaro
packages compilers.
- Chuck
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Esch Nigma
Hi there.
At the moment one can add a command executing after a build of a target
using:
add_custom_command(... POST_BUILD...)
However if the command have a dependencies which build after the target,
there is practically no way to specify it.
Simple case: we have a library and tests for it.
Dear all,
I have generated a bundle for MacOS as follows:
if(APPLE)
set(OS_BUNDLE MACOSX_BUNDLE)
elseif(WIN32)
set(OS_BUNDLE WIN32)
endif()
include_directories(${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR})
add_executable(FADTTSter ${OS_BUNDLE}
${FADTTS_src}
)
On 06/01/2016 05:04 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Attached you will find a couple of really small changes that add const to a
> method and fix a couple of typos in comments. Trivial stuff.
Thanks. I've applied the changes:
cmSearchPath: Fix typo in comment
On 06/01/2016 09:04 AM, Yordanov, Dimitar wrote:
> I'm looking into an issue with a CMake build on Linux hanging in a
> select syscall, when using EXECUTE_PROCESS without any additional
> arguments. The subprocess executed is "chmod". The child finishes and
> is marked as a zombie, but CMake did
On 05/31/2016 03:17 PM, Matthäus G. Chajdas wrote:
> I've just pushed "add-opencl-imported-target" which adds an imported
> target to FindOpenCL. The whole change is rather small:
>
> https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c53137a19e482140db3dc97b626af38348f2c71
>
> Good to
On 05/27/2016 09:02 AM, Brad King wrote:
> I'll announce when post-3.6 development in 'next' is open.
I've branched 'release' for 3.6. The repository is now open for
post-3.6 development. Please rebase any open topics on 'master'
before merging to 'next'.
> * Documentation updates
> *
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 36ec325b71c4dcc5c65ae3c44c43b75efdf1500c (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
discards afce47035ef92e0b9b97f6bd2ac3ac395669201c (commit)
discards
>
> Could you provide a working, stripped down example to show the problem
> provided via github (in an example repo).
>
I've added a simple test project to
https://github.com/martinwag/test_cmake/tree/master
Note that this example does not need cross gcc for ARM. It doesn't implement
any
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via afce47035ef92e0b9b97f6bd2ac3ac395669201c (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 9d81f1b3aaa82d12a3a87067572b3ff5e2b9c4d2 (commit)
via
The standard choice is c++
[eschnigma@manjaro ~]$ c++ --version c++ (GCC) 6.1.1 20160501 Copyright (C)
2016
Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for
copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via f258626f963518d54ae326471e9560e490f67de7 (commit)
via
>
>[eschnigma@manjaro build]$ cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING="Debug"
> -- The C compiler identification is unknown
> -- The CXX compiler identification is unknown
>
This is definitely the reason for no debug symbols. If the compiler is
unknown then CMake won't know the right flags to
Hey,
I'm looking into an issue with a CMake build on Linux hanging in a
select syscall, when using EXECUTE_PROCESS without any additional
arguments. The subprocess executed is "chmod". The child finishes and
is marked as a zombie, but CMake did not realize that. The only
descriptors left open
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 5e4ac458141630cd1e2dc2cd68becd8ae18f58f5 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 62adedbf5e4fd54fc017cf78a8127875260f84a4 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 067dd85ac5d2316209d5349c634a1e8966f3b386 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 4062d6d69419fa072bf9394ee1de9cab468113e0 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 7642dde19e096826c22f5305bcb2dc3aa767a4a3 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via a4e984d5fdb0190c09e04b4138467150fb5ab3d8 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b8560be7b0697c90cce259998b5c64bdff039ccd (commit)
via
Hello all,
I just registered to this mailing list, my apologies if this was already
discussed.
I'm experiencing an issue where I'm unable to debug my code when the project is
configured with CMake. When running gdb on the final binary, it mentions that
no
debugging symbols are found. I tried
01.06.2016, 14:09, "Jakob van Bethlehem" :
>> Hey, that was the LTS release until 1 or 2 month ago!
>
> Oops, you're right, my mistake. Somewhere in the back of my head was that the
> 4-series was in the 4.12.x or so version, not sure where that came from.
KDE 4 I
> Hey, that was the LTS release until 1 or 2 month ago!
Oops, you're right, my mistake. Somewhere in the back of my head was that
the 4-series was in the 4.12.x or so version, not sure where that came
from. I haven't worked with Qt4 ever, but have become extremely experienced
with Qt5 from Qt 5.4
I was about to ask the list, but some googling lead me to this:
https://github.com/polysquare/cmake-unit
I am not the developer, but he doesn't appear to be on here so I thought I
should share. This looks incredibly useful
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check
Hello All,
I want to use CMake to manage my MFC projects, and I added the following
code:
set( CMAKE_MFC_FLAG 2)
add_executable(MFCDemo WIN32
${MFC_RESOURCE_FILES}
${MFC_HEADER_FILES}
${MFC_SOURCE_FILES}
)
target_compile_definitions(MFCDemo
Hi,
We've recently switched to using cmake and I've got some 'issues'. We use
Windows with Visual Studio and MSVC (Visual Studio 10 2010 Win64 generator).
1. In cmake error output the output format is not compatible with VS so
when the VS console displays it, you cannot click on the
Hi CMake Developers!
Attached you will find a couple of really small changes that add const to a
method and fix a couple of typos in comments. Trivial stuff.
This is mostly to figure out how to contribute code:-)
Is this the preferred way you want your patches? Or do I need to inline
them
Am 1. Juni 2016 09:26:18 MESZ, schrieb Jakob van Bethlehem
:
>That is what he said, but it seems to be a typo, because the
>CMakeLists.txt
>file clearly states 'set(QT_DIR
>${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/ThirdParty/Qt/4.8.6)'
Ok, I overlooked that one...
>- still a
That is what he said, but it seems to be a typo, because the CMakeLists.txt
file clearly states 'set(QT_DIR
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/ThirdParty/Qt/4.8.6)'
- still a stone-age version of Qt actually :(
Sincerely,
Jakob van Bethlehem
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Hendrik Sattler
Am 1. Juni 2016 09:02:41 MESZ, schrieb Jakob van Bethlehem
:
>Hej,
>
>Some things that come to mind:
>* You're generating files *inside* the source tree - you're not
>supposed to
>do that
>* Why do you want to have a special Qt_tmp directory? I don't see the
>benefit,
Hej,
Some things that come to mind:
* You're generating files *inside* the source tree - you're not supposed to
do that
* Why do you want to have a special Qt_tmp directory? I don't see the
benefit, and without that requirement you can simply use the qt4_wrap_cpp
macro explicitly and you still
49 matches
Mail list logo