Hi again Robert,
Would you be able to give me an estimate of how many APK projects you have,
roughly which open source projects you reference via CMake
add_subdirectories, and whether you have any variants beyond the default
Debug and Release? If possible I'd like to approximate your project layout
Targets are specified per-Variation so they need to go under the
variation-specific section. Probably something like this:
defaultConfig {
externalNativeBuild {
cmake {
targets "library1", "
By the way when I try to use "targets", I get a failure. Basically
Gradle doesn't recognize that keyword. I tried singular form as well
("target"), no luck.
I'm running canary build of everything possible. What am I missing?
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Jom O'Fisher wrote:
> By gradle module
Doh, forgot the links I intended to reference in my original email:
[1]: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.6/command/find_package.html
[2]:
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.6/manual/cmake-packages.7.html#creating-packages
[3]: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.6/module/CMakePackageConfigHelpers.html
So I've been studying the find_package[1] and "creating packages"[2]
documentation, as well as the CMakePackageConfigHelpers[3] page.
Based on the current offerings of configuration packages, I do not
understand the need for the relocatable config.cmake file when all it
really contains is:
includ
Am 25.08.2017 um 16:12 schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
Below is a typical case for us
(https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt). If
it looks pretty shitty, it probably is. That's the best we have been
able to come up with based on the documentation.
Below is the example code. We
> Below is a typical case for us
> (https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt). If
> it looks pretty shitty, it probably is. That's the best we have been
> able to come up with based on the documentation.
Below is the example code. We don't know whether it should be:
set(SHE
The documentation for execute_process has some room for improvement.
We recently got burned by a problem that has existed since at least
2011: https://stackoverflow.com/q/6797395/608639 . Once we learned the
problem we could research a bit. The problem cost us over 8 man hours
when it should not h
Hello
I confirmed this is fixed.
I used 9538d22d955a0b101548019003f2d5c7ba833d77 for the check.
Brad King wrote:
On 08/23/2017 05:07 AM, masaru tsuchiyama wrote:
It seems your coworker can reproduce it and you can use the PC tomorrow.
So I don't need to debug it, right?
Correct, thanks. See
