mmon.c. One time for liba and
> the other one for libb.
>
> What is the best way to force common.c to be compiled just ones?
If a and b are static libs, create a static lib for the common code and
link both against it. If a and b are shared libs, make the common code a
shared lib too and
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 13:01:49 David Cole wrote:
> 2012/2/7 Nicolas Desprès :
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Schneider
wrote:
> >> On Saturday 29 October 2011 23:34:50 Frank Glinka wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >
>
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:59:47 David Cole wrote:
> I would love it if you would push them to the stage and merge to 'next'...
>
Done.
-- andreas
--
Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: F33E3FC6
www.cryptomilk.orga...@cryptomilk.org
t need more stability and could thus
keep subscribing to "experimental", whereas "master" currently is (too?) old.
If someone would like to create CMakeLists with it or use .vcproj
in their build, then simply ponder making use of the converter
(and possibly let me know of any is
on!!)
install code. Required dependencies' install() handling
should predominantly be processed _first_
and _then_ any custom code of the parent config should be executed.
While a (parent) cmake_install.cmake should be configurable for insertion
of custom code either at the beginning or end
o other (good) solution than creating find modules, is it
possible to place the find modules (Library_n.cmake files, right?) within the
library folders? I ask this, because I think it would make it much more easy to
maintain them.
Kind regards,
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
build and create
workspace etc. from there. The created workspace should then also build all
necessary libraries for the application.
Any ideas on this?
Kind regards,
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
nd-modules for all 3 provide the absolute paths to the libraries in
CMake variables which you can use with target_link_libraries directly
and it'll just work.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
ks on windows (and no I'm not
talking about cygwin).
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
t;/subsystem:windows" works the way it does seems like a bug. So what's the proper way
to achieve what I want?
I'm using CMake 2.8.7 on Win 7 with VS2010.
Cheers
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensou
y from that.
In that sense I'd expect cross-platform apps to have something like
add_executable(foo WIN32 MACOSX_BUNDLE ${SRCS})
since cmake will simply ignore the windows/macosx specific flags on
platforms that they don't apply on.
For a CMake release I'd say that the gener
On 06.03.12 18:47:05, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> > > > 2 things I
will automat‐ ically be replaced by the location of the executable
created at build time.
So either the manual is wrong and one needs to manually construct the
correct paths even for in-project targets or cmake should prefer an
existing target over an executable reachable via PATH.
Andreas
-
filenames for the include depending on which of the above you
use (foo.moc vs moc_foo.cpp vs. moc_foo.cxx or something like that).
If none of them is an option for you then I guess using
add_custom_target and add_dependencies is the way to go.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
On 08.03.12 09:50:55, Michael Jackson wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>
> > On 07.03.12 10:10:27, Michael Jackson wrote:
> >> In an effort to speed up the build of a project that uses Qt (and moc) I
> >> tried an alternate approach with
for CMake to automatically
> determine the dependencies?
I've looked at using CMake to build some Java files (in an otherwise
C++/C project) some time ago and the result was that Java-support simply
does not fit with CMake's language and functions - at least not in the
way include_direct
On 08.03.12 19:24:00, Cong Ma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Imported library has scope in the directory in which it is created and
> below.
>
> If I want to use this library in parent scope, what should I do?
Add the imported library in the top-level cmake file, not a
subdirectory.
Andre
ile, set the compile command to
compile the corresponding cpp file. I can't imagine it being that hard,
since one would merely have to change the file extension in the command
line from cpp to lzz. Any ideas?
I'm not sure though, this might be more of a Visual Studio-specific
questio
On 12-Mar-12 9:36 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 3/12/2012 3:28 PM, Andreas Haferburg wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently evaluating Lazy C++ [1], which generates both header and
source files. I'm using add_custom_command() to invoke the generator on
*.lzz file, and for each .lzz file it gen
Bill, thank you for your replies.
I'll be writing a macro for Visual Studio then which finds the
corresponding cpp file and compiles it.
Cheers
Andreas
On 12-Mar-12 10:26 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 3/12/2012 5:00 PM, Andreas Haferburg wrote:
Yea, that's pretty much what I
On 12.03.12 08:42:44, Kedzierski, Artur CIV NSWC Corona, PA13 wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Do you mind sharing a CMakeLists.txt for one of your Java projects?
> Thank You.
Sorry, thats not possible since its closed source.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
RARY(libevent_core ${CoreSrcFiles})
> ADD_LIBRARY(libevent_extras ${ExtraSrcFiles})
> ADD_LIBRARY(libevent)
> TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(libevent libevent_core libevent_extras)
>
> but this generates a warning/error, listing the two libraries in
Whats the error? It should just work.
A
ions/classes etc.).
Looking at strip's commandline parameters it might be possible to
manually strip just the symbols you don't want in the static library,
but this cannot be done by cmake automatically. So you'll have to create
a custom post-install command to do this for you.
Andrea
es a
> binary for windows). You can see the command and the error below.
>
> cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/local/install/bpp/windows -
> CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/local/i386-mingw32-4.3.0/bin/i386-mingw32-g++
Would possibly be useful to specify the second variable via -D, too :)
HTH,
27;m currently not
entirely sure, but IMHO using configure_file() should provide exactly that.
I.e. configure_file() from original file to the destination file
which you then file(STRINGS...), and it should trigger re-configure
whenever the original file changed.
Andreas Mohr
--
Power
s. So check you
project wether you maybe disabled C++ support, or wether you maybe have
C++ code in .c files.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
unction is implemented, the file is not part
of the target thats being compiled.
I'm guessing either you have some kind of mismatch between declaration
and implementation or the file is really not in the list of sources to
compile. If you can't find it and you can post the code, ad
u'll have to look into creating
an APT repository with the corresponding package list and directory
structure. This is something that CMake cannot do for you at the moment.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensourc
e, apt-get or some such).
dpkg will not install missing dependencies.
Probably the best thing to do is to push the package
to some APT pool server out there (possibly even your own),
then have a user add that URL to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
and install everything automatically via apt-get
Andre
Dear Petar,
In cmake 2.8.3, you can set Boost_NO_SYSTEM_PATHS to true.
Kind regards,
Andreas Naumann
Am 11.04.2012 15:04, schrieb Petar Marendic:
Greetings,
I recently noticed that FindPackage always begins its search for
package Boost in /usr/lib and only thereafter in the directory
ustom-command or configure_file.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/un
Hi,
you could set Boost_DEBUG and Boost_DETAILED_FAILURE_MSG to true and
have a look at the messages.
I hope, this helps you.
Andreas
Am 12.04.2012 11:06, schrieb Joeri Friederich:
Hi
Im
trying to build PCL (Point cloud library) files using Cmake.
It
needs a bunch if
find_package inside a function.
- Use a macro instead of a function, macro's do not create a new scope
- inspect all the find-modules you use and adapt them to use
PARENT_SCOPE for variables when they do not end up in the cache.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware op
ems and suggest an
> alternative url.
Works just fine here right now. I'm not aware of any mirror for cmake
unfortunately.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and che
On 16.04.12 06:04:33, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Mon Apr 16 2012, Andreas Pakulat
> wrote:
>
> > On 16.04.12 01:37:58, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >>
> >> consider this simple wrapper:
> >>
> >> function(my_find_package)
> >>
needed at all here or should not be needed. Just
make sure to pass ${cblas} and ${atlas} to
target_link_libraries. If that produces errors please provide the exact
error message.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/openso
installation rules
add_subdirectory(src)
Andreas
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Schindler wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I wonder if it's possible to ignore install() commands in projects that
> are being built using add_subdirectory().
>
> I've got a project that builds
e
(command-line argument) srings (not CMake lists!) CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS,
CMAKE_C_FLAGS, CMAKE_CXX_, CMAKE_C_FLAGS_.
set (CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -pedantic")
Andreas
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Mathias Gaunard
wrote:
> Is there a way to read back what flags were add
latform cfg from HOST-side rather than TARGET-side attributes]
Thus spake someone who still hasn't found the time to implement
at least a semi-usable/-supported (static) CMake way
of platform configuration type dependent switching in his V2C converter... :-P
(1 year old bug report an
tent-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > I'd think that Debug/Release isn't all that matters -
> > what discussions all too conveniently leave out (possibly even the KDE
> > Wiki-side target config discussion!) is pl
o not use the QT_USE_FILE and instead have
target_link_libraries list all the Qt libraries individually. The
FindQt4.cmake module provides a variable for each Qt library it finds, so
you can decide for each target against which Qt components to link this
particular target.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.ki
be
extended to document these potential include pre-conditions.
The best way to verify define existence would obviously be a more _manual_
compile setup
of a dummy source plus header include.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitwa
ainful way,
whereas many major SCM tools have quite flexible d2u handling builtin...
(had to put this tag here for my admittedly less specific reply)
BTW, I currently have an updated version of the "community-maintained"
(see related tracker item) PCH support Module within my vcproj2c
, you should look at the BundleUtilities
module. Unlike what it name might suggest it works cross-platform,
providing a suite of utility functions to assemble a standalone directory
for your application and all its dependencies.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source pr
various packages are named in the distribution. Those distro-packages
will then only have your own projects binaries. If the project is
open-source, the distributions mit also be willing to do the packaging and
ship them with their releases. Then you'd merely need to provide source
packages for t
Hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Michael Jackson <
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote:
>
> On May 16, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 schrieb Michael Jackson :
> > We have a small open-source
ARIES as a new argument mode, setting the property
> instead of linking.
Actually using link_interface_libraries in target_link_libraries works
already in 2.6.4 I believe, since KDE uses that and requires that cmake
version at the moment.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitwa
just
allows to disable this behaviour by defining which dependent libraries a
given library exposes in its public API and hence which dependent libraries
an executable might need to link against in addition to the main library.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
ry of the parent
of TestA - IMHO. Test/CMakeLists.txt can still use all targets from TestB,
since target names are always valid across the complete project.
Since TestA is a submodule, it should always be present in the sources
anyway.
Andreas
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitwa
argets from
>> TestB, since target names are always valid across the complete project.
>>
>> Since TestA is a submodule, it should always be present in the sources
>> anyway.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>
> I use functionality of TestB in Test. If TestA decides
hen just put it
> into the Find*.cmake in the HINTS section (again: cmake --help-command
> find_library).
>
Luckily CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH can also be set as environment variable, not just
as cmake variable. So if you can teach the module system to set
CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH (or the INCLUDE/LIBRARY v
ot) enable wx2.4 build compat config flag
(and thus end up with incompatible vtable ABI issues).
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ a
s considerably
shorter than what you have there. So it seems that this is customizable to
a certain extent (I'm not an expert when it comes to jenkins on windows). I
know thats not what you were looking for, but might be an easier to
maintain change than patching CMake each time a new relea
easily re-build a CMake of your own that has it enabled. Simply turn on the
> advanced cache option CMAKE_ENABLE_NINJA when configuring CMake.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
space issues here.
So it's at least *better* than it used to be, but there might be hidden
niceties lurking
(and this is what the dashboard test result likely hints at).
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/o
On 05.09.08 21:46:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 04.09.08 21:50:03, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> ...
> > > This pops up a dialog in kdevelop saying "This project doesn't contain
> > > any files y
nt
path.
Hardcoding the path is nice though to not having to go through the
find-the-library loop all the time and to be on the safe side as long as
the library devs play by the rules.
Unless of course I'm missing some important piece :)
Andreas
--
You are a v
nd windows :)
Although I suspect you didn't mean "CMakeLists.txt" there, as that would
mean removing the complete buildsystem you've written.
Andreas
--
Just because the message may never be received does not mean it is
not worth sending.
__
ut adding files, removing directories and more.
Your use-case actually sounds as if what you really want are multiple
builddirectories for the different toolchains you want to use.
Granted there's not much that can be done when a FindXXX.cmake fil
too.
What happened to the two windows SDK patches, that made the visual
studio generator create files with selectable
SDKs? Are there in the queue of patches to apply to cmake, or still
not ready yet?
kind regards
Andreas Pokorny
2008/8/5 Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Frid
HEADERINFO})
SET(CMAKE_CL_MACHINE_TYPE ${CMAKE_MATCH_1})
MESSAGE(STATUS "${CMAKE_CL_MACHINE_TYPE}")
Is there a better way?
Andreas
2008/9/17 Andreas Pokorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I am about to do that right now. I just discovered that there is a
> tool called dumpbim
hope that no project
decides to conditionally add or remove source files based on the
target architecture.
kind regards
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
number of SDKs installed.
What was the problem with the cmake user interface?
kind regards,
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
lib / gtk / pango / ...).
> It also doesn't make sure that the *config.h matches the library found (if
> you ever have two versions installed).
>
Sounds like you're volunteering to rewrite the module ;)
I've written it some time ago for cmake 2.4. I'm not a GTK2 user
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 03:42:11 Philip Lowman wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Is a switch to Subversion still planned at some point in the near future
> for CMake?
Hopefully not.
>
> On occasion I have wanted to checkout the latest CVS from work and am
> reminded of the corporate firewall. =)
You want
Hello Clemens,
I still try to get some time slot to try your patches here. Since we
do not have that many 2005
licenses, I cannot do that as a kind of submarine project :).
2008/9/30 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andreas,
>
> I had a look at your modified files and, like the
Hi,
Is the code attached to this thread the most recent source code for
WinCE and Windows Mobile
support?
kind regards
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa934487.aspx
There seem to be countless variants of WinCE. I recently heard about
Windows CE Auto
and Windows CE Automotive. CE seems to be constantly moving target.
kind regards
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
include/boost-1_36/boost/thread/mutex.hpp:12:44: error:
> boost/thread/detail/platform.hpp: No such file or directory
Either you didn't search for boost, it wasn't found or you forgot the
include_directories() call for the boost-include directory.
Which cmake version are
relies
on the existance of dumpbin.exe (which is searched quite extensively) does not
break existing setups.
regards
Andreas Pokorny
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
che both or not?
Andreas
--
You don't become a failure until you're satisfied with being one.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On 18.10.08 18:01:51, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a bit confused from readme.txt in the Modules directory, regarding
> > which variables in a FindFoo.cmake or in my case FooConfig.cmake should
eal with the versioning).
Because there's no libstdc++.so, which usually indicates missing -dev
packages. But anyway, you don't need to search for libstdc++, the compiler
will pick the right one.
Andreas
--
You'll wish that you had done some of the hard things when they were easie
piled into app like shown
above. Or app has to link against a library that provides the code. If you
don't want to compile Config.cpp as often as you have moduleX, then I
suggest to create a static library inside common that each app links
against. This means no runtime-dependency on that libr
s
>
> So we can get it in step by step.
Thanks for being so patient.
kind regards
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
e macros for handling moc/ui files
simply put the result into the same subdir as the original files are. You
might be able to provide the -o option to the calls, but I'd be interested
to know why you think having the files in the directory might be a problem.
Andreas
--
You will be misunder
The exact names of the targets are not so important as what they do (or
> supposed to do).
The way to get rid of any non-source files with CMake is rm -rf .
If you're doing in-source builds then you're simply masochistic ;P
Andreas
--
You may worry about
ncluding) -gcc
til the end. Now you have your component name. So for the example the
component name is "date_time". Thats how FindBoost.cmake works, it simply
puts together the library name from
boost_
Andreas
--
You will gain money by an immoral action.
___
so if you find errors you need to report them and work with the
CMake people on fixing them - or fix them locally in your installation.
Andreas
--
Don't look now, but the man in the moon is laughing at you.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
library with a few headers, for which a UseXXX
file is provided the requirement really doesn't make much sense (IMHO) -
unless you can use some of the headers without linking.
Andreas
--
Don't read any sky-writing for the next two weeks.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
for the temporary project?
regards
Andreas Pokorny
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On 11.11.08 14:12:39, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> On 10.11.08 12:01:13, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>>> The CGAL library (www.cgal.org) uses cmake as build system. Thus, our
>>> users do:
>>>
>>> find_pac
uple
of libs as default to link against makes sense. OTOH if you want full
control you should simply use just the find_package() and then use the
variables that it defines where needed.
Andreas
--
A visit to a strange place will bring fresh work.
___
CMa
not supported on all platforms, one which is
x86_64 IIRC. So either create a shared library or get a static build of
FTGL.
Andreas
--
You'll never see all the places, or read all the books, but fortunately,
they're not all recommended.
_
nment and cmake variables
(given on the commandline) but uses mixed case for all variables it
"exports". I recall that there were specific changes to make it this way,
so now I'm confused??
Andreas
--
You will gain money by an immoral action.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
includes the object files inside your static library.
You have two options
* build libftgl.a yourself with -fPIC.
* link libftgl.so to your library - then you have FTGL as a runtime dependency
kind regards
Andreas
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.
ain a reference to the libftgl.a that you had before.
Andreas
--
Your aim is high and to the right.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
library without sources otoh simply is a non-existing file. If all your
code is in the headers, then you don't need a library, just install the
headers.
Andreas
--
Celebrate Hannibal Day this year. Take an elephant to lunch.
___
CMake mailing list
grading, the 2.4 Module is
rather outdated and pretty old so no wonder that it doesn't work with a
recent compiler.
Andreas
--
Everything that you know is wrong, but you can be straightened out.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
ly generate this project.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:1 (PROJECT)
-- Configuring done
E:\work\build>
==
Any ideas what I am missing here?
What is OLDNAMES.lib?
I used the platform files posted at: http:/
to include the version number into the library names. The
variable allows to support later versions.
Andreas
--
You are fighting for survival in your own sweet and gentle way.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
ld cover
> a vast number of cases where an autotools developer would use a
> convenience lib.
>
> Am I missing something?
This is Ok for building an executable, but linking a static lib into a
shared lib is completely unportable and not supported on all operating
systems that cmake sup
g a
static lib into a shared lib is not solveable by libtool. Its only
solveable by changing how the library format of the problematic platforms
work.
Andreas
--
Courage is your greatest present need.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
convenience libs is added into cmake.
PS: What has been discussed (and afaik even requested via cmake's
bugtracker) is to allow access to the actual created object files. That
way you could have the same files included in >1 shared library and would
still save the compilation time.
t IIRC it wasn't
me, so don't really know.
> Also the latest cvs binary for win32 still does not have support for
> boost 1.37.
Thats not a problem, see the top of FindBoost.cmake, you can set
Boost_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS prior to find_package to use newer boost
packages.
Andreas
--
On 23.11.08 18:58:57, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
>> On 23.11.08 14:43:19, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FindBoost does not work for me on windows because of a wrong pathname:
>>>
>>> if (WIN32 AND
On 23.11.08 20:56:24, James Mansion wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> This is Ok for building an executable, but linking a static lib into a
>> shared lib is completely unportable and not supported on all operating
>> systems that cmake supports. Thats why its not done.
nd regards
Andreas Pokorny
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
ing the manpage. All you need
is in there. Well there are some people who are not used to read manpages. I
think that is the problem.
However there is #cmake @ freenode for those who need help.
Cheers,
-- andreas
--
http://www.cynapses.org/ - cybernetic synapses
signature.asc
Descr
find the
kdevplatform module is here:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdevelop/CMakeLists.txt?view=markup
Andreas
--
Keep it short for pithy sake.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
201 - 300 of 1033 matches
Mail list logo