From: Alan W. Irwin (on cmake list)
Yes, [svnversion] is the whole point! It is much easier
than using individual
revision nubmers for each file.
Although not nearly as informative. I just tried svnversion,
and it only
gives a range of Revision numbers for the source tree. That's
-Original Message-
From: Juan Sanchez
Not being a member of the subversion list. And doubting that
non cmake
members can email this list. Please email us the results of
your query
Okay, if people don't think it irrelevant to Cmake. I'm sensitive to the
fact this discussion is
From: Alan W. Irwin
[...]I've tried the following in CMakeLists, placing the output of
'svnversion' and similar commands into an included source
file and it
works [...]
Can some form of dependency be set so that if any source file is
changed [...]
Or, should I use another
Hi,
I have a project with lots of c files that I am trying to place under
Cmake. And, I must say , it is working really well ! But ... Since there
are lots of c files, the list of possible targets returned by
'make help', after running cmake, is rather useless (unless run though
'head -8' or
-Original Message-
From: Juan Sanchez
Hi Robert,
I had no idea those targets existed. I would find them useful,
especially if the .o files went to a deterministic location.
I observe that when using cmake, they do indeed go into a deterministic
loaction, that is
-Original Message-
KSpam
Subject: Re: [CMake] Can Make help be set less verbose?
Robert,
I used to have the same problem until I restructured my
project. The trick is
NOT to list source files in the top-level CMakeLists.txt file.
Yes, that will help eventually and I had
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Mathias Froehlich wrote:
Hi,
That is way too croase and will even bring the wrong results.
It produces good results on linux x64 and itanium platforms. I have
tested and
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Atwood, Robert C
Sent: 14 September 2007 12:30
To: Colin D Bennett; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: RE: [CMake] Re: Fltk project, visual studio 2005 (8)
-- using FL/Fl.H
*smak self*
I swear I thought I tried that permutaion before, but .. It
seems
project, visual studio 2005 (8) --
using FL/Fl.H
Atwood, Robert C wrote:
The tabinter.h file contains:
// generated by Fast Light User Interface Designer (fluid) version
1.0108
#ifndef tabinter_h
#define tabinter_h
#include FL/Fl.H
... Etc
I've selected the default
Hi,
I have a small project using FLTK, I have built successfully on Linux /
GCC using Cmake. This project does not have any ITK or VTK in it (yet)
. I am just tryign to also build it on Windows with Visual Studio 2005
(8) and though I believe I specified the correct location for FLTK
files, it
On a Cygwin machine, I get the message when I try to configure DEBUG mode
Warning: CMake is forcing CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to Release to match that
imported from ITK. This is required because projects must use the same...
That does not make much sense to me, as I expect to be able to compile my
Hi,
I have a bit of a problem, which I can work around but would rather not
have to... I am using FLUID to make a FLTK interface, at this point just
to read some data into a customized structure. The structure definition
is in my header file 'eletable.h' in the source directory. The FLUID
file is
This seems to work (not quite as you suggest but similar)
1.
INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES(${WIRS_BUILD_DIR}/path/to/.{cxx|h}) as
appropriate.
You mean ${WIRS_SOURCE_DIR} ... and that seems to work but I am still
puzzled why it is not included by default, it seems logical that your
own source dir
You can add the following to your toplevel CMakeLists.txt:
SET(CMAKE_INCLUDE_CURRENT_DIR TRUE)
Yes, that's just what I want ! Thannks
make.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables#Various_Options
That site's a bit scary, I'll stick with cmake.org for now!
;-/
commands upon installing the 2.4.7-1 cygwin package. One has winXP-64
and the other has winXP-32
thanks
..
From: Bill Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 27/07/2007 4:29 PM
To: Atwood, Robert C
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Cannot seem
Hi, I installed Cygwin on a new machine intending to use ITK and friends, but I
reached a roadblock in that ccmake appears not to exist, despite repeatedly
installing and uninstalling, reinstalling etc. the 2.4.7-1 installation. IN
fact, selecteing 'source' option does not even give me any
16 matches
Mail list logo