LUDE_PATH.
Thanks
--
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC SimTech
Pfaffenwaldring 5a, D-70569 Stuttgart
+49 (711) 685-60044
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various servi
Hey,
neat idea, i've tried and it works (i have custom targets there).
However, the "nice" colored build text output of such a solution gets
lost completely (pipes etc); are there any alternative ideas/solutions?
thanks again!
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. I
utput) i'd like to print
something like "Whoops it went wrong, type this and that or visit this
or that website for help"
i know this should ALSO be in the documentation, but you know how people
intuitively avoid reading those important parts :-)
any help/ideas are appreciated.
-std=c99" c flags.
so has that simply not come up yet or is there a reason cmake does not
add those flags for intel?
thanks!
--
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC SimTech
Pfaffenwaldring 5a
+49 711 685 60044
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topi
aving this included, feel free to include any
part of it in future releases.
if this is not the "right way" of proposing such things, where to go to?
cheers
Daniel
--
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC SimTech
Pfaffenwaldring 5a
+49 711 685 60044
#.rst:
# FindGit
# ---
#
#
#
Hey all,
sorry for the late reply but that indeed fixes the issue!
thanks Brad.
On 28.08.2015 17:15, Brad King wrote:
On 08/27/2015 03:24 AM, Daniel Wirtz wrote:
CMake 3.3.0.
[snip]
after checking, the @CMakeFiles/VerifyFortranC.dir/linklibs.rsp does not
contain the "-lgfortran&quo
ons? i need the objects of foo inside a larger
target and want to avoid having a separate library being build that
needs extra linking.
cheers!
--
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC SimTech
Pfaffenwaldring 5a
+49 711 685 60044
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-to
se things up automatically.
so am i missing something obvious here or is this still an (mingw-only)
issue?
to be clear, i can just skip the verification tests and everything
works, but i'd like to think that if that is the case the
FortranCInterface_VERIFY()
should work as well.
thanks!
and have that
being configured into the module
folders with appropriate different values inserted.
i'd go for the second option myself.
cheers
Daniel
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC SimTech
Pfaffenwaldring 5a
+49 711 685 60044
On 07/06/2015 02:41 PM, Crast, Nicholas wrote
many packages; e.g. the
fortran preprocessor from intel
(in the version we have, cant be upgraded) only allows 4K command lines :-(
are there any setting in cmake that could help with that? does anyone
have experience with that?
thanks!
--
Dr. Daniel Wirtz
Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.
SRC Si
make'ified software environment (which is
good!), we will sooner or later encounter
"downstream" package constellations that have transitive linking into
cmake packages over more than 3 levels..
so i think it is worth while discussing/thinking about a suitable design
to include.
be
"could not find library z"
unless you magically knew that libz is a dependent link library of libA
and where to include it from. Including the absolute path to libz in
libA's config is also not the way to go, as it ruins the portability
over different systems.
Is there a "nat
12 matches
Mail list logo