Hi Falk, the TI Docs contains the following line: cl6x --run_linker {--rom_model | --ram_model} filenames [options] [--output_file= name.out] --library= library [lnk.cmd]
therefore i'd suggest the following changes: set(CMAKE_C_LINK_EXECUTABLE "<CMAKE_C_COMPILER> --run_linker <OBJECTS> <CMAKE_C_LINK_FLAGS> <LINK_FLAGS> --map_file=<TARGET>.map --output_file=<TARGET> <LINK_LIBRARIES>") set(CMAKE_ASM_LINK_EXECUTABLE "<CMAKE_ASM_COMPILER> --run_linker <OBJECTS> <CMAKE_ASM_LINK_FLAGS> <LINK_FLAGS> --map_file=<TARGET>.map --output_file=<TARGET> <LINK_LIBRARIES>") set(CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE "<CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER> --run_linker <OBJECTS> <CMAKE_CXX_LINK_FLAGS> <LINK_FLAGS> --map_file=<TARGET>.map --output_file=<TARGET> <LINK_LIBRARIES>") I'm using it on a c++ project, linker language is c, the c/c++ line above works for me. I didn't test ASM, but i guess that's straight forward. Maybe Alex Neundorf can do this change . Regards, Florian 2015-05-28 8:15 GMT+02:00 Tristram, Falk <falk.trist...@cognex.com>: > Hi all, > > > > before creating a bug report about this problem, I first want to get > feedback here. > > I have created a CMake build system for a whole bunch of embedded targets > all working fine. > > > > Now I ran into a strange problem related to the tms470_5.0.1. > > Some of the symbols are just dropped by linker (optimized out). > > I pinned down the problem to the “TI-C.cmake”. > > > > set(CMAKE_C_LINK_EXECUTABLE "<CMAKE_C_COMPILER> --run_linker > --output_file=<TARGET> --map_file=<TARGET>.map <CMAKE_C_LINK_FLAGS> > <LINK_LIBRARIES> <LINK_FLAGS> <OBJECTS>") > > > > <OBJECTS> is the last entry. > > In my case OBJECTS just consists out of one file “main.c.obj”. > > > > Changing the order just works fine, as follows: > > set(CMAKE_C_LINK_EXECUTABLE "<CMAKE_C_COMPILER> --run_linker > --output_file=<TARGET> --map_file=<TARGET>.map <CMAKE_C_LINK_FLAGS> > <OBJECTS> <LINK_LIBRARIES> <LINK_FLAGS>") > > > > Now here is my question: > > Is there any specific reason why <OBJECTS> comes as last parameter? > > Could you change the order for future versions? > > > > Note: I am still checking/testing the impact of the changed order to our > other TI-C build systems. > > > > Best regards, > > Falk > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more > information on each offering, please visit: > > CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html > CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html > CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake