[CMake] How to deal with "make uninstall" ?

Hello, I'm a newbie of cmake. In a simple project, I worte the CMakelists.txt file like this: cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) PROJECT(FREERECITE) ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(src) ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(dict) INSTALL(FILES ../bin/Fre

Re: [CMake] How to deal with "make uninstall" ?

Óscar Fuentes wrote: Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] When I use "make install", everything do as I wanted. But I can't use "make uninstall". How to deal with it? http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Can_I_do_.22make_uninstall.22_with_CMake.3F

[CMake] Does Cmake add 'standard' include paths ?

Generally I am using CMake successfully, and am generating makefiles for Linux, Solaris, and Visual Studio 9. I recently used the "Eclipse CDT4 - NMake Makefiles" generator, and then loaded the resulting project into my Eclipse environment under Windows XP. Eclipse then complains about missi

Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

Do you have a stale CMakeCache.txt file somewhere ? It's *usually* perfectly safe to delete all occurrences of CMakeCache.txt within a project and have CMake regenerate them. I say usually, because I have no idea if you are modifying that file for some reason, although the practice is not reco

Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

__ From: Joe L [mailto:superist_...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:44 PM To: Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group); cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7 I deleted the whole build directory before running the b

Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

make.org] On Behalf Of Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:51 AM To: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7 "The path is made from a batch script, and cmake is hardcoded to use 32bit on windows in the build scripts."

Re: [CMake] Does Cmake add 'standard' include paths ?

On Tuesday 05 January 2010, Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - > UniCredit Group) wrote: > > Generally I am using CMake successfully, and am generating > makefiles > > for Linux, Solaris, and Visual Studio 9. I recently used > the "Eclipse > > CDT4 - NMake Makefiles&quo

Re: [CMake] Does Cmake add 'standard' include paths ?

+Edited for brevity. > In the Help menu go to "About Eclipse" then click on "CDT" > icon this will show you your CDT version. Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools - Mylyn Bridge Version: 5.1.0.200909110608 Build id: 200909110608 > Is eclipse OK when you create a CDT project usin

Re: [CMake] Does Cmake add 'standard' include paths ?

Never Mind, I found the errant include directive. I do apologize. > -Original Message- > From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org > [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Smith Jack > (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:34 AM > To: cmake@c

Re: [CMake] How to regenerate source file during make?

I do a similar thing with an XSD file from which I generate c++ wrapper classes for accessing the corresponding XML Note the DEPENDS line ! MACRO(XSD FILE NAMESPACE) ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( OUTPUT ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/xml/${FILE}.cpp OUTPUT ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/x

[CMake] Visual Studio sub-projects

Does the Cmake Visual Studio generator understand the concept of sub projects. Solution -ProjectA -ProjectB --SubprojectB1 --SubprojectB2 -ProjectC I'd like to have a generated solution such that when opened within visual studio, the subprojects SubprojectB1, and SubprojectB2 are "collapsable"

[CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

I have the following scenario: I have a large project with several sub-projects. I always want CMake run Visual Studio/Nmake/Eclipse specific generators for all the sub-projects so that I may edit any sub-project in my IDE of choice on the platform of choice. BUT when Make (Gmake, Nmake, etc.

Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

It's worryingly quiet on this subject. > -Original Message- > From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org > [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Smith Jack > (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 6:31 PM > To: cmake@cmake.org > Subject: [C

Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

"Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group)" > : > > > > It's worryingly quiet on this subject. > > So, just exclude the target that won't build from ALL. > I'm afraid you've lost me there. Do I do this within a CMakeLists.txt file ? My current CMake

Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

platform test to see if it should build the target. Is this possible. > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit > Group) wrote: > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org > >>

Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

> -Original Message- > From: Eric Noulard [mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 10:51 AM > To: Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Subject: Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators > > 2010/3/3