Re: [CMake] Mailing lists for cvs and bugtracker

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:26:24PM +0100, Filipe Sousa wrote: > Joerg Mayer wrote: > > I'd like to follow development of cmake a bit more closely. In order to > > do that, many other open source projects have mailing lists that follow > > the cvs commit and the b

[CMake] Mailing lists for cvs and bugtracker

thing like that be set up? Thanks Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of

Re: [CMake] Find template

iners agree that they are going to accept that. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read

Re: [CMake] Find template

on, the > script repository will become a huge mess. Maybe you haven't read what I want and why I want it (2 mails ago). I really need them to be identical - I don't care which one, just *IDENTICAL*!!! So why do you propose a solution where the are *NOT* identical??? ci

Re: [CMake] Find template

re the least whether one person Uses XXX, another Xxx and a third xxx. The only thing is, I want the variables provided by the package to use the same case that the package part of the filename uses. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [CMake] Find template

One thing I forgot to mention: Once we have decided on a standard, all packages need to be changed. In order to not break older packages, packages that actually need changing should provide both, their old vars and name and the new vars and name. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer

Re: [CMake] Find template

}_LIBRARIES) endforeach(pack) I don't case which varname is finally selected, but personally I prefer the plural versions (i.e. ...INCLUDE_DIRS ..._LIBRARIES). Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

3) Regarding point 3) - the advantage of changing to the 3 clause license: It was made to resolve the problem I mentioned in 1). As I was wrong, I don't see any strong necessity any more, now it's just a cultural thing: I like things to be GPL compatible ;-) Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer

[CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

icense (aka new bsd license)? Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead o