[CMake] QT AUTOMOC problems with latest versions

l] Error 2 The source is structured in different source folders and I use the cmake’s automoc set(CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON) Has anybody experienced similar issues? Has anything changed in the way cmake performs automoc since version 3.8.x? Thanks in advance! Best, Jose -- Powered by www.kitware.c

[CMake] Adding (external project) dependency to interface target

face library to trigger the library downloading and configuration process. But apparently this is not allowed and I get this error: add_dependencies Cannot add target-level dependencies to INTERFACE library target "EigenExternal" Is there any workaround for this or am I doing somethi

Re: [CMake] Is it possible to show dependent files in Visual Studio "folders" for ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET?

That's exactly what I was looking for, thanks Fraser! JL On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Fraser Hutchison wrote: > I think this is what the SOURCES arg is for. You could just duplicate the > list of DEPENDS files as the SOURCES argument too: > > add_custom_target(LIB_NAME DEPENDS ${LIST_OF_HE

[CMake] Is it possible to show dependent files in Visual Studio "folders" for ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET?

rches, etc. Any idea on how to achieve this? Is it possible without modifying CMake sources? Cheers, Jose Luis -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

Re: [CMake] Weird linking error while cross compiling

ss this is what it is causing me the troubles but It should not since I rebuilt it without problems and when I check the content of the library with nm the functions are there. Any help?? Thank you Jose 2011/10/26 Michael Hertling > On 10/26/2011 10:28 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > O

Re: [CMake] Weird linking error while cross compiling

ng with other programs. Could it be the include_directories("library include dir") which is messing this up? it looks like the linker disregard the path of the library that Im pasinng and looks for -lxerces-c instead. Is that xerces-c defined somehow before? Thank you so much Jose 2011/

[CMake] Weird linking error while cross compiling

y know what I'm doing wrong. Cmake might be missing the libraries or the path of the libraries Have you guys come across something like this before?? Best Regards Jose -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensour

[CMake] Compiling and building using boost under Windows.

, boost_filesystem-vcXX-mt-1_47 and libboost_filesystem-vcXX-mt-1_47.dll It looks like it is a problem that can be fixed modifying some boost variables like prefixes or suffixes but I have tried some combinations and didn't come up with a solution that works Any kind of help would be appreciate

[CMake] Cross Compilation problem

Hello all, I have been struggling with this problem for 2 days and I cannot really find a solution. I have a c++ application that I want to cross compile under Fedora 15 to use it with Windows. The packages that my app depends on are already pre-compiled in : /usr/i686-mingw32./ I am using

[CMake] Cross Compilation problem

d host directories SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_PROGRAM NEVER) # for libraries and headers in the target directories SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY ONLY) SET(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_INCLUDE ONLY) Thank you so much Jose -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projec

[CMake] Notes not showing up on CDash

I have been trying to upload files as notes for my builds using the ctest_submit(PARTS Notes) command. When i run the script it shows submissions successful but when i check the dashboard i cannot find any notes. What am i doing wrong ? Regards Johny

Re: [CMake] Custom memory checking result processing

Thanks for the suggestions, but i already went down these paths. The problem is my logs in xml format on an average go above 100 MB of output, with gen-suppressions i get 300MB output files and the suppressions file generated out of these is again way too big for my liking. If only valgrind had

Re: [CMake] Custom memory checking result processing

- From: Marcel Loose [mailto:lo...@astron.nl] Sent: Fri 6/25/2010 2:30 PM To: david.c...@kitware.com Cc: Johny Jose; cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Custom memory checking result processing Well, I sort of ran into exactly the same problem that Johny describes. I devoted two mails on this issue

[CMake] Custom memory checking result processing

Dear all, I am using valgrind to debug a framework which depends on several other underlying frameworks to function properly. As a result my memory checking turns up thousands of errors. I only want to see errors that arise from my framework. This is figured can be done by simply looking for a

[CMake] Alternative IDL compiler, and adding non-present sources

ust us" that those sources will exist someday? Thanks! Jose Luis -- ___ Jose-Luis Blanco-Claraco Phone: +34 952 132848 Dpto. Ingenieria de Sistemas y Automatica E.T.S.I. Telecomunicacion Fax: +34 952 133361 Universidad de Ma

[CMake] Search paths for FooConfig.cmake files

f seeing this feature in future releases of CMake, so please let me know if anyone see any compatibility problem in this patch and how to deal with it. Best, JL -- ___ Jose-Luis Blanco-Claraco Phone: +34 952 132848 Dpto. Ing

Re: [CMake] [Fwd: Re: Why does dependency scanning in version 2.6 seem so slow?]

nd.make". Scanning dependencies of target mrpt-core real0m18.788s user0m7.456s sys0m4.552s ==> without touching (just realizing there's nothing to do): 2.23s real0m2.234s user0m1.468s sys0m0.528s On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CMake] [Fwd: Re: Why does dependency scanning in version 2.6 seem so slow?]

~1 min. too) I'd be happy to help debugging this, because it's really annoying :-( Regards, Jose Luis On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Senanu Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hi folks, > > >> Is there a way to speed up the dependency scan in version 2.

RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

Append(CXXFLAGS = '-ptused -64 -T 12800') which is consistent with what you were saying. I will also test you cvs fix. Thanks much, Jose -Original Message- From: William A. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 11:24 AM To: Renteria, Jose (Cont, ARL

RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

ng as expected. Unfortunately the “-T 12800” is required for our Paraview build. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of William A. Hoffman Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 10:37 AM To: Renteria, Jose (Cont, ARL/CISD); cmake@cmake.org Cc: Subject:RE: [

RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

Yes, I can and have build CMake (2.2.3 and the cvs CMake). -Original Message- From: William A. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 10:26 AM To: Renteria, Jose (Cont, ARL/CISD); cmake@cmake.org Cc: Subject:RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work

RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

/ICE.01.24.06/build/Paraview-IRIX64/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp' gmake: *** [cmTryCompileExec] Error 2 CMake will not be able to correctly generate this project. Jose -Original Message- From: William A. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 8:23 AM To: Rente

RE: [CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

I am running IRIX 6.5.26f. And I have tried CMake 2.2.3 and the cvs CMake. As for steps below, do want me to try this from the CMake build directory or from the ParaView build directory? Jose -Original Message- From: William A. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 1/24

[CMake] cmake 2.3.2 nor latest cvs work on Irix

ase for me. Any ideas? Thanks, Jose ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake