Re: [CMake] Effort to create a new generator (tup)

2010-05-07 Thread Mike Shal
On 5/7/10, Michael Wild wrote: > > On 6. May, 2010, at 18:59 , Jed Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:16:14 +0200, Michael Wild wrote: > >> > >> Another issue: How would one automatically rerun CMake when one of the > >> input files to CMake changes? Of course, the build would then hav

Re: [CMake] Effort to create a new generator (tup)

2010-05-07 Thread Mike Shal
On 5/6/10, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 5/6/2010 12:59 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > > Rebuilding with modified Tupfiles is not a problem, and will only build > > what is necessary. But: > > > > Tup doesn't support generating the Tupfiles themselves from other > > programs. If you do that, you would

Re: [CMake] Effort to create a new generator (tup)

2010-05-05 Thread Mike Shal
On 5/5/10, Jed Brown wrote: > Having just experimented with tup recently, test suites are a potential > issue. As I understand it, tup will always build everything rather than > stopping, for example, with the shared library or a select executable. > It would be a problem if updating the libr

Re: [CMake] Effort to create a new generator (tup)

2010-05-05 Thread Mike Shal
On 5/5/10, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 5/5/2010 3:39 PM, Mike Shal wrote: > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bill Hoffman > kitware.com> wrote: > > > > > On 4/22/2010 3:47 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > > > > > As we never

Re: [CMake] Effort to create a new generator (tup)

2010-05-05 Thread Mike Shal
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 4/22/2010 3:47 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> As we never attempted to do any sort of CMake generator, not even >> looking the existing, I'd like to know the expected effort to write >> one for Tup from you guys. Anyone that would li