Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 10:19 AM, "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Mike Jackson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Tim. I absolutely applaud your efforts to get something working on OS X. >> With the lack of anything else your solution was the only thing available >

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:43 AM, "Boudewijn Rempt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: >> K-3D doesn't use Qt, but it's a clean, realistic example of 3rd-parthy > > But still seems to want it: > > INCLUDE(FindQ

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:42 AM, "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is some new functionality in the latest CVS that is supposed to > take care of all this on OS X. I have not had a chance to try it out > or work with it yet. > > If you update to CVS CMake, take a look at the BundleUtilities.cma

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:41 AM, "Boudewijn Rempt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: > >> On 9/16/08 8:26 AM, "Boudewijn Rempt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> \ >>> Ah... Well, we're struggling with that our

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 8:26 AM, "Boudewijn Rempt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: \ > Ah... Well, we're struggling with that ourselves at the moment, and looking > in vain some good examples. Right now, we're using CPack for Linux and > Windows, > and have stopped using CPack for OS X -- where I am right now writin

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 8:15 AM, "Stephen Collyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example > showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well > as those built from the install target ? If the > "third party libraries" happened to include Qt, > that'd be just fine .. K-

[CMake] Generating temp directories

2008-08-11 Thread Shead, Timothy
One of the optional steps in generating OSX bundles involves mounting a temporary disk image so a flag can be set to enable custom icons. Until now the CPack bundle generator has been using ${CPACK_TOPLEVEL_DIRECTORY}/mnt as the mountpoint for this operation, which works fine until you stumble a

Re: [CMake] Installing OSX Frameworks

2008-07-23 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 7/23/08 1:45 PM, "Bill Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is also a module in CMake that we have been using for this type of > thing. See Modules/GetPrerequisites.cmake. Man, those Kitware guys think of everything ;) While I'm at it, is there a good way to install an external shared

Re: [CMake] Installing OSX Frameworks

2008-07-23 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 7/23/08 11:14 AM, "Mike Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 July 2008 16:06:21 Mike Jackson wrote: >> What would probably be nice at this point would be an example OS X >> centric project that uses all these ideas with code explanations for >> each step. > I think what would be

Re: [CMake] Installing OSX Frameworks

2008-07-23 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 7/23/08 9:06 AM, "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What should be happening is that your application should be linked > with libraries that have an "install_name" set to @execuatble_path/../ > Frameworks" or "@executable_path/../Dylibs/" or something > along those lines. If yo

Re: [CMake] Installing OSX Frameworks

2008-07-22 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 7/22/08 10:56 AM, "Mike Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone worked out a nice way of installing the needed OSX frameworks into > my application bundle? If you use the (bleeding-edge) CPack bundle generator, you can install frameworks (or any other dependency) using normal CMake ins

Re: [CMake] cmake 2.6.1 RC 11

2008-07-18 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 7/18/08 1:32 PM, "Bill Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a release candidate (RC 11) for 2.6.1 ready for CMake. > If I do not get any complaints about this RC, it will become 2.6.1. Not a complaint, but there are some improvements to the cpack bundle generator that would be nice-to-

Re: [CMake] Component specific installation

2008-06-30 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 6/27/08 8:58 PM, "Daniel Stonier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you actually trigger component specific installations though? > I've currently got a 'headers' component. On a normal cmake with unix > makefiles, there's a makefile target for > > make list_all_components > > but no way of a

Re: [CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

2008-06-06 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 6/6/08 10:49 AM, "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Shead, Timothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I started the new generator because I needed more control over the final >> output than current approaches provi

[CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

2008-06-06 Thread Shead, Timothy
Folks: I've just posted a patch that introduces a prototype OSX bundle generator here: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=7170 Along with a writeup in the wiki here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/User:Tshead/OSX_CPack_Bundle_Generator I started the new generator because I needed more contr