Re: [CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
Mike Arthur wrote: On Monday 09 February 2009 20:15:33 Tyler Roscoe wrote: Does anyone do anything like this? Are there tools around to help? Is this a worthwhile thing to think about? I think this shouldn't be separate from the rest of your other TDD stuff that the non-buildsystem developers a

Re: [CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-11 Thread Mike Arthur
On Monday 09 February 2009 20:15:33 Tyler Roscoe wrote: > Does anyone do anything like this? Are there tools around to help? Is > this a worthwhile thing to think about? I think this shouldn't be separate from the rest of your other TDD stuff that the non-buildsystem developers are doing. In my

Re: [CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-11 Thread Hugo Heden
2009/2/11 Tyler Roscoe : > Bumping this one time. Any thoughts? Is there a better place to ask this > sort of question? > Just wanted to say that I'm interested too, so I'd follow any discussion with interest. Best regards Hugo Heden > Thanks, > tyler > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:15:33PM -080

Re: [CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-10 Thread Philip Lowman
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Tyler Roscoe wrote: > Bumping this one time. Any thoughts? Is there a better place to ask this > sort of question? Sorry, my eyes glazed over the first time I read this sentence and I think I was pretty tired so not knowing what these acronyms went I think I jus

Re: [CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-10 Thread Tyler Roscoe
Bumping this one time. Any thoughts? Is there a better place to ask this sort of question? Thanks, tyler On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:15:33PM -0800, Tyler Roscoe wrote: > My company is adopting Test-Driven Development. I am wondering if any of > you build engineers in a similar position have given

[CMake] "unit" testing your CMakeLists.txt

2009-02-09 Thread Tyler Roscoe
My company is adopting Test-Driven Development. I am wondering if any of you build engineers in a similar position have given any thought to how one might use this approach when developing your build systems. In one sense, you can say, "Well, the build is the test. If I say 'go' and I end up with